Page 1:Energy-Efficient Performance Wanted
Page 2:Sandy Bridge Processor Overview
Page 3:Efficiency Features On-Board
Page 4:Test Setup And System Details
Page 5:Benchmark Results: Integrated Graphics Performance
Page 6:Benchmark Results: Discrete Graphics Performance
Page 7:Power Consumption Results
Page 8:Integrated Graphics Efficiency Results
Page 9:Discrete Graphics Efficiency Results
Discrete Graphics Efficiency Results
As expected, the runtime for all single-threaded apps is shortest on Sandy Bridge again, mostly thanks to its higher clock speeds and performance per clock.
Average power is still lower on Sandy Bridge than on the other solutions.
Finally, total power used is also lowest on the second-generation Core processors. The AMD platforms require significantly more, as they not only require more power for the workload, but the added graphics card also consumes power without contributing to this particular task.
The runtime on the multi-threaded applications is actually very similar on the fast Intel quad-core chips and the AMD hexa-core model. The two new Sandy Bridge-based systems are fastest.
The total power used is still much higher on the AMD systems, but the multi-threaded applications favor the four- and six-core processors.
Full Efficiency Workload
Overall average power across our entire workload is lowest on the new Sandy Bridge-based systems.
The overall efficiency score with discrete graphics shows similar relationships between the different platforms, although the absolute gaps are smaller. The reason is the Radeon HD 5850 card we used, which requires power all the time and balances existing differences.
- Energy-Efficient Performance Wanted
- Sandy Bridge Processor Overview
- Efficiency Features On-Board
- Test Setup And System Details
- Benchmark Results: Integrated Graphics Performance
- Benchmark Results: Discrete Graphics Performance
- Power Consumption Results
- Integrated Graphics Efficiency Results
- Discrete Graphics Efficiency Results