Linux Mint team considers longer gaps between releases in attempt to accelerate development efforts — current six-month cycle means ‘we spend more time testing, fixing, and releasing than developing’

Linux Mint
(Image credit: Linux Mint)

In its latest monthly update, the Linux Mint blog looks back at development over the prior decade. One of the distro’s strengths, according to the author(s), is that the Mint team does things incrementally, making changes slowly. The big news is that this blog post provides a pretty strong signal that the developers want to break from the rigid six-monthly update cycle they have self-imposed. It looks like things are going to get even more incremental and slow. Is this playing to the distro’s strengths, as the blog indicates? Conversely, the blog also suggests that more time between releases will let the Linux Mint team be more ambitious.

Longer development cycle allows for greater ambition

Schedules can easily become a burden. The good news is, if time tables are self-imposed, it isn’t that difficult to change them. However, Linux Mint has grown quite a following, so the developers probably hope this blog post will ease user fears and reduce push-back over their planned timing changes.

The Linux Mint developers argue that “With a release every six months plus LMDE, we spend more time testing, fixing, and releasing than developing.” Rationally, it is difficult to argue against this assertion. Moreover, the devs say that there are great upsides to departing from a strict timing regimen. Most notably, the admin load of the six-monthly release schedule “caps our ambition when it comes to development.” The extra time could be used for more ambitious developments between updates.

Article continues below
Swipe to scroll horizontally
Linux Mint LTS: recent release calendar

LTS Version

Release date

22.3 Zena

Jan 11, 2026

22.2 Zara

Sep 4, 2025

22.1 Xia

Jan 16, 2025

22 Wilma

Jul 25, 2024

21.3 Virginia

Jan 12, 2024

21.2 Victoria

Jul 16, 2023

21.1 Vera

Dec 20, 2023

21 Vanessa

Jul 31, 2022

For now, no new schedule has been proposed. That’s good if this kind of time-based commitment detracts from development. Nevertheless, a schedule can assure users that the distro isn’t going to be left behind technologically, compared to the throng of alternatives. We have to wait and see the final form of the changes and the proposed “longer development cycle” before further judgment. If the changes are done right, this redefinition of the cycle will strengthen Mint’s identity and reputation for independence and stability.

We are asked to “stay tuned” for more details on the lengthened development cycle.

Elsewhere in the Linux Mint monthly news update, there are segments highlighting the success of Mint 22.3, the distro's new keyboard layouts and IM, and a discussion of new user management tools.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • Zaranthos
    I love Linux Mint. One of my favorite distros of all time. I like the UI and because it's based on Ubuntu it has broad support and long term support. Linux in general has gotten a lot better.
    Reply
  • rustigsmed
    they should just stick with LMDE
    Reply
  • DS426
    rustigsmed said:
    they should just stick with LMDE
    Agreed; Linux Mint has the resources, identity, respect, user base, and capabilities that put them in a prime position to derive directly from Debian rather than Ubuntu, the later adding an additional depedency and taking away a degree of freedom and control from the LM house.

    Ubuntu has arguably become more controversial in recent years, so it's also a way to avoid that drama.
    Reply
  • Stomx
    Yes, LM is great. But when you install Windows "not an emulator" WINE it becomes simply amazing. It makes Linux better than Linux and Windows better than Windows. Perfectly works even with the latest server chips.

    And no, nobody needs upgrades every 6 months, ones per couple years is enough. Better upgrade your software repository to be as appealing as with Apple and Android. Make install, upgrade and remove with just one click. Introduce payable software not just free one to better compensate the developers, the poor amount of donations LM lives on is ridiculous, $15-20k /year. Microsoft for its junk gets **1 million times** more
    Reply
  • thesyndrome
    Zaranthos said:
    I love Linux Mint. One of my favorite distros of all time. I like the UI and because it's based on Ubuntu it has broad support and long term support. Linux in general has gotten a lot better.
    Yeah I started trying out Linux late last year and Mint was the one I settled with on my laptop because of it's UI, ease of use, and wide-ranging support.

    I still plan to test out others, but Mint is a really great starting point for epople moving from Windows
    Reply