February report from researcher found Chinese KVM had undocumented microphone and communicated with China-based servers, but many of the security issues are now addressed [Updated]

A NanoKVM PCIe
(Image credit: telefoncek.si)

Edit 12/8/2025 5:25 pm PT: Adjusted article to reflect that the report was published in February.

In February, a Slovenian security researcher published an analysis of Sipeed’s NanoKVM that raised far-reaching concerns about the €30-€60 ($35-70) remote management device. Alarmingly, the researcher’s teardown showed the device shipped with a catalogue of security failures and an undocumented microphone that could be activated over SSH. After reporting the issues, many of those problems have been addressed over the intervening months.

A hidden microphone inside a NanoKVM device

(Image credit: telefoncek.si)

The NanoKVM’s network behavior raised further questions, as it routed DNS queries through Chinese servers by default and made routine connections to Sipeed infrastructure to fetch updates and a closed-source binary component. The key verifying that component was stored in plain text on the device, and there was no integrity check for downloaded firmware.

The underlying Linux build was also a heavily pared-down image without common management tools, yet it included tcpdump and aircrack, utilities normally associated with packet inspection and wireless testing rather than production hardware intended to sit on privileged networks.

All this, paired with the discovery of a tiny surface-mount microphone, should make any user suspicious of the device’s true intentions. The researcher said the microphone is not documented in product materials, yet the operating system includes ALSA tools such as amixer and arecord that can activate it immediately. With default SSH credentials still present on many deployed units, the researcher demonstrated that audio could be recorded and exfiltrated with minimal effort, and streaming that audio in real time would require only modest additional scripting.

Thankfully, because NanoKVM is nominally open source, community members have begun porting alternative Linux distributions, first on Debian and later Ubuntu. Reflashing requires opening the case and writing a new image to the internal microSD card, but early builds already support Sipeed’s modified KVM code. Physically removing the microphone is possible, though the component’s size and placement make it a fiddly job without magnification. Sipeed has since addressed many of the security concerns around the device. However, the general consensus is that users should flash these devices to custom Linux distributions to mitigate potential issues, and many reviewers currently recommend Sipeed products for use in homelab environments.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • SonoraTechnical
    Of course they did...
    Crickets in here without any direct link to the Article Comment Section.... but I guess that's the idea...
    Reply
  • ezst036
    I stay away from Chinese tech at all costs for this very reason. You just never know, and the Chinese government is not content enough with spying on its own citizens. It needs to spy on everyone else too.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    From the story, what I see is a device that's ripe for exploitation, but doesn't obviously have backdoors planted for such a purpose. It looks much more like amateur hour than a serious attempt to backdoor IT infrastructure.

    As for the microphone, that has some totally non-nefarious applications, in a KVM. For instance, being able to remotely switch it on to listen for beeps or other unusual noises. In fact, you could even use an anomaly detection model that learns what the environment is supposed to sound like and raises an alarm when it hears anything different.

    I'm not trying to excuse the device's flaws, but I do think the story is being over-hyped.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    ezst036 said:
    I stay away from Chinese tech at all costs for this very reason. You just never know, and the Chinese government is not content enough with spying on its own citizens. It needs to spy on everyone else too.
    This really doesn't seem like a planted back door by anyone competent (and you best believe the Chinese government has some competent cybersecurity folks). The reason being that, when you backdoor stuff, you want to try and hide it so that:
    It's not discovered and disabled or mitigated by potential victims.
    It's not used by your enemies or criminals to attack your own infrastructure.
    So, I'd ask that people use some common sense, when viewing stories of this kind. I'm not saying there are no back doors, but the ones we should worry about are like that attempted xz exploit that nearly succeeded. In fact, we should worry how many similar exploits like that might've gone in that haven't been discovered!
    Reply
  • Insidei
    Specs
    Audio interface: Audio Output: Onboard PA amplifier, can directly connect speakers under 1W
    Audio Input: Onboard analog silicon microphone, capable of direct sound reception

    Lol
    Reply
  • SirStephenH
    That's not going to be a high quality mic and it looks pretty well buried inside, surrounded by multiple circuit boards and a plastic case. I'd be interested to know what, if anything, it could hear and at what distance.

    I wouldn't be surprised to find out that it's just an off-the-shelf part that comes that way. It's still concerning, but not as concerning as all of the security holes.
    Reply
  • SkyBill40
    To be honest, I'm rather surprised the comments are turned on for this story.
    Reply
  • taymorf
    So no Samsung, no Motorola, no USA technology
    Reply
  • Ronnyx25
    This is nothing. Look into Maxio or Maxiotek SSD controllers.

    It was a Taiwanese SSD controller company born out of Jmicron.
    Now suddenly without any Notice its fully Chinese. No more Taiwanese location. But all in China. While everyone believes it's still the same Trusted Taiwan company. Well think again..

    Millions of Computers have these SSD Controllers. While the firmware can send all your secrets to China.
    Reply
  • Walter_Ego
    this is basically like if the researcher bought a pikvm and published an analysis saying "omg pikvm has hidden bluetooth functionality" or something else because he didn't realise that a pikvm is just a raspberry pi with a hdmi -> csi adaptor and some software.

    in this case, the nanokvm is just a licheerv nano with a hdmi -> csi adaptor and some software. the licheerv nano is just a little sbc that happens to have a microphone on board, which is mentioned in the specs.

    the link to the analysis is old btw, it's from feb. if the nanokvm wiki content history is accurate, the researcher should have been able to find this information back in 2024.
    Reply