Wingtech posts $1.3 billion loss and faces Shanghai delisting as Nexperia audit collapses — 57% of company's assets can't be verified

Nexperia
(Image credit: Getty / NurPhoto)

Wingtech Technology, the Chinese parent of Dutch chipmaker Nexperia, reported a net loss of 8.7 billion yuan ($1.3 billion) for 2025 and now faces a delisting risk warning on the Shanghai Stock Exchange after its auditor said it couldn’t verify the company's financial statements, SCMP reports.

The auditor, RSM, issued a disclaimer of opinion on the annual accounts because Nexperia represents roughly 57% of Wingtech's total assets, and RSM has been unable to access its financial data. Wingtech’s loss tripled from 2.8 billion yuan in 2024, with nearly all of the damage coming from Wingtech writing Nexperia's value down to 24.38 billion yuan ($3.43 billion) after reclassifying the subsidiary as no longer under its control.

Article continues below

All this has erased what had been a strong year for Wingtech before the dispute began. Through the first three quarters of 2025, Wingtech posted a cumulative net profit of 1.5 billion yuan, and the company said in the filing that it’s pursuing legal remedies and accelerating development of a domestic supply chain to maintain deliveries to customers.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • circadia
    ...is this a good thing or a bad thing?
    Reply
  • Eximo
    Bad for Wingtech surely. Looks like the Dutch government has intervened in their ownership after they bought the company. Their audit failed because they no longer have access to the Dutch side of the business.

    Someone needs to be compensated. If they allowed the takeover in the first place, kind of on them.
    Reply