Xerox Outlines Vision for Next Generation Computer Assembly
Xerox's xerographic micro-assembly process may provide a revolutionary new way to assemble computers.
According to Xerox, a revolutionary new way to build computers is just on the horizon, offering the ability for unique computing devices to be cheaply produced according to individual customer needs. This production process involves a technique known as "xerographic micro-assembly" that breaks down conventional silicon chip designs into thousands of "chiplets," and then custom assembles them with an advanced 3D printer that uses microscopic electric fields to place each mote of silicon smart dust on a template.
Xerographic printing is an extension of Alien Technology's Fluidic Self Assembly process in which nanoblock computing elements float in a solution and are then guided into holes in an appropriate substrate. It can be viewed as an electronic version of Henry Ford's modular part system where each part is smaller than a single grain of sand.
It is still unknown as to whether the new Xerox machine will dispense a mixed semiconductor ink or different inks made of uniform components and whether fragility issues will make traditional interconnections impossible. Though there's no indication that this technology will be replacing circuit boards or chip boards at this time, it offers incredible promise for producing unique computing devices according to individual customer needs.
Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
-
JOSHSKORN Give it time. Microsoft will steal another idea from Xerox. First the mouse, now this!Reply -
iam2thecrowe I see this existing as a patent only, and never really going into production. I mean, printers aren't reliable, how are these chiplets/interconnects going to be reliable, and how would they test each one?Reply