Intel Wants 100 Thunderbolt Devices by Year's End

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • phatboe
    I refuse to purchase thunderbolt devices until Intel opens the spec or at least allows others to license it to make competing thunderbolt controllers.
    Reply
  • icepick314
    i don't get the point of all these different specs...

    USB, HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI, firewire, Thunderbolt....

    it's just muddying up market for new devices and making them expensive to support all these different specs...
    Reply
  • soo-nah-mee
    icepick314i don't get the point of all these different specs...USB, HDMI, DisplayPort, DVI, firewire, Thunderbolt....it's just muddying up market for new devices and making them expensive to support all these different specs...I think that's the idea: To replace all of those with one. Then in the future, there will be far less muddying.
    Reply
  • neoverdugo
    Well, that ain't gonna happen. Intel has been very busy making it's "Intel Only" PCs for years now.
    Intel wants to ditch USBs, PCI-E, Third party GPUs, memory cards, Storage drives, MBs away from its processors. Intel already has the SSD, MBs, Thunderbolt, graphic chip-set; the memory division it still unavailable (Which AMD beat them to it with patriot's help). Intel is competing with apple in the "Closed Hardware System" category, especially with its "Ultrabook"
    Reply
  • jacobdrj
    @neoverdugo

    Intel used to have Centrino... It was an attempt at a 'platform' for mobile.
    USB was invented by Intel, and expressly gave rights to be licensed for marginal (if any) cost, to promote adoption...

    Thunderbolt isn't a 'new standard' like USB or Firewire... It is standard agnostic, or at least, it is supposed to be...

    I would very much like an all unified connectivity interface... I think the next iteration of Thunderbolt, when it gets revved to true LightPeak, we may finally have what we need in this context.

    I want thunderbolt enclosures, so that I can install external boot SSDs that are native SATA on to hard-to-service iMacs...
    Reply
  • Light Peak was developed by Intel actually. They rebranded it Thunderbolt and made it an Apple exclusive, but the only change was the 10 Gb/s both ways over copper instead of the original 100 Gb/s over fiber optic design. Apple in no way designed Thunderbolt.

    Neoverdugo, you are smoking something. USB - originally developed by Intel. PCI - originally developed by Intel. You could go back to ISA, SATA, and the others and you'll find Intel was the company that spearheaded all of it. Intel has hardly closed the system. In fact, they are responsible for opening it up against the will of IBM (who did their own thing with microchannel and other proprietary technologies).

    The issue with Intel is that they want $$$ for their tech now.
    Reply
  • chuckydb
    The only way I can see Thunderbolt being usefull is for an external desktop gpu plugged in your laptop.
    Other than taht.... PASS....
    Reply
  • soo-nah-meeI think that's the idea: To replace all of those with one. Then in the future, there will be far less muddying.That's only in a perfect world.
    http://xkcd.com/927/
    Reply
  • danwat1234
    USB 3.0 is perfect for 95% of people out there and it's cheap. So what is Intel thinking? Oh yeah, $$$
    I'm sure the new Ivy Bridge Apple laptops will have USB3. I mean the chipset has it and if they don't wire a USB3 header for their computers I'll be ROFL.
    Reply
  • Vladislaus
    jacobdrj@neoverdugoIntel used to have Centrino... It was an attempt at a 'platform' for mobile.USB was invented by Intel, and expressly gave rights to be licensed for marginal (if any) cost, to promote adoption...Thunderbolt isn't a 'new standard' like USB or Firewire... It is standard agnostic, or at least, it is supposed to be...I would very much like an all unified connectivity interface... I think the next iteration of Thunderbolt, when it gets revved to true LightPeak, we may finally have what we need in this context.I want thunderbolt enclosures, so that I can install external boot SSDs that are native SATA on to hard-to-service iMacs...Intel was involved in the development of USB but they didn't single handed invented it.
    Reply