PC Components
GPUs

NVIDIA GeForceFX 5600 Ultra & FX 5200 Ultra: Performance

Features

By Lars Weinand

published 11 March 2003

Comments (0)

Page 5 of 27:

Antalus Botmatch

Page 1: Introduction
Page 2: Unanswered Questions
Page 3: Test Setup
Page 4: Benchmarks
Page 5: Antalus Botmatch
Page 6: Splinter Cell
Page 7: Splinter Cell Minimum FPS, Continued
Page 8: Aquanox
Page 9: Serious Sam: Second Encounter
Page 10: Serious Sam: Second Encounter Minimum FPS, Continued
Page 11: 3D Mark 2001 SE
Page 12: 3D Mark 2001 Detail Tests
Page 13: Fillrate Multi Texturing
Page 14: Vertex Shader Speed
Page 15: Pixel Shader Speed
Page 16: 3D Mark 2003
Page 17: 3D Mark 2003 Detail Tests
Page 18: Fillrate Tests
Page 19: Shader Tests
Page 20: Codecreatures
Page 21: Codecreatures Avg. # Of Polygons, Continued
Page 22: Image Quality
Page 23: 8x Anisotropic Filtering
Page 24: UT 2003: 8x Aniso Performance
Page 25: 4x FSAA + 8x Anisotropic Filtering
Page 26: UT 2003: 4x FSAA & 8x Aniso Performance
Page 27: Conclusion

Antalus Botmatch

In the botmatch test, the 5600 Ultra loses to the Ti 4200 and the Radeon 9500 PRO, but it beats the non-PROs. Once more, the 5200 Ultra beats the Radeon 9000 PRO/ 9200.

Stay on the Cutting Edge

Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.

Contact me with news and offers from other Future brandsReceive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors

By submitting your information you agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy and are aged 16 or over.