Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Opinion: 10 Technologies That Need to Deliver in 2012

By - Source: Tom's Hardware US | B 48 comments

As 2011 is well behind us, we are looking back at a year of massive successes as well as some catastrophic failures, we are noticing a gateway to opportunity for some interesting products and technologies.

There is no definitive answer whether any of them will succeed or fail, but they all have in common a tremendous pressure to evolve and quickly make many, many friends. Here are my top 10 for this year.

10. Apple’s Siri

Huh? How could Siri end up on this list? Hear me out and give me a moment to explain before you scroll down to the comments. No question, with Siri, Apple has a killer app on its hands that can change the way we interact with electronics. The initial demonstration of Siri during the iPhone 4S presentation was spectacular, even if I have to admit that the round logo surrounding a microphone reminds me a bit of HAL in 2001: A Space Odyssey. I am glad that Apple resisted the temptation of adding red color to the image. Lately, I have noticed that there is a great deal of Siri fatigue that isn’t just happening in my family. Some tech geeks, including Pat Moorhead, formerly of AMD fame, state they aren’t using Siri nearly as much as they did in the past. Perhaps the reason is that we generally consider a cellphone to be a very personal device and we just don’t like talking into it in public – outside of a phone call. Whatever the reason, Apple’s Siri was unfinished when it was released. Therefore, Apple will need to follow up with a compelling integrated user model that spans across multiple platforms input methods – including gestures that are much more private than voice input. My take? Siri has a 50 percent chance of success.

9. WebOS

You can accuse HP of being either incredibly malicious in how it wrecked WebOS or being somewhat incompetent by not taking advantage of a perfectly good mobile operating system. Any way you look at it, the downfall of WebOS (including somewhat ugly smartphones and a tablet that ignored virtually all tablet lessons taught by Apple) is a casualty that could have been prevented had HP been committed to WebOS in the way it promised when it acquired Palm for $1.2 billion. Giving away hundreds of thousands of Touchpads for ridiculously low prices was the only way to create a WebOS user base. The decision to open source WebOS is a concession that HP either cannot or does not want to develop the OS with the originally given commitment (and that it could not find a buyer). However, free access is the only way to attract developers who can provide their creations to a substantial user base. The future of WebOS is in the hands of developers now. My take? WebOS has a 20 percent chance of survival, but its outlook strongly depends on HP’s promise that hardware development for WebOS will continue, which is a statement that stands on shaky ground.

8. Touch

The value of “touch” will come under scrutiny in 2012. Touch has not really evolved since the presentation of multi-touch and what I would describe as Apple’s idea of how to make touch much more useful than it ever was in the January 2007 presentation of the iPhone. Five years later, we are accustomed to touch and Apple is playing with ideas about how to expand upon it (see above, Siri). The rest of the industry appears to be exploiting touch in every possible way, even outside of phones and tablets and in hardware where it does not make much sense. Microsoft will test the value of touch on notebooks and desktops with the Metro UI in Windows 8 and may learn that we really don’t want to reach across keyboards and touch a possibly bouncing screen. We are already seeing possible successors for touch, such as “external” touch displays; for example, 3D projectors that show a display on a wall. There is also Kinect that is clearly showing the way to gesture- and voice-based computing for desktop-sized devices. My take? There is a 100 percent chance that, by the end of 2012, there will be a data input technology that is superior to touch (and the keyboard/mouse) on notebooks and desktop PCs.

7. Chrome OS

Google’s decision to send out reportedly 65,000 free Cr-48 notebooks to establish a user and support base was ingenious. However, the following commercial Chrome OS notebooks were way too expensive and had little chance of success because Google did not provide offline applications in time. Let’s be honest; an affordable always-on data connection is still very much science fiction. You just don’t pay $400 for a portable computer that needs a data connection in order to function when you’re on the road. Also, it may not always be available at the speeds you require. Sometimes that connection may not be available at all, and if it is available, the cost of significant (and careless) data consumption could easily approach the amount you have allocated for your mortgage payment. Additionally, the development of Chrome OS is continuing at a fast pace, but it is clear that the OS was not ready for primetime when it was released. Next year is do or die time for Chrome OS. However, Google is spending more money on Chrome OS than Larry Page and Sergey Brin are spending on new Boeing jets. Chrome OS is critical for Google to bind users to utilizing Google Search, which secures its search revenues. My take? Chrome OS does not stand a chance in its current form, but its outlook will improve with greater adoption of the Chrome browser, cross-platform features when Chrome for Android is released, more applications, penetration of NaCl to run legacy entertainment software, and especially offline applications. In the end, Chrome OS must succeed in one way or the other, as a portion of Google’s future depends on it.

6. Intel Atom

Originally released in April 2008, Intel had a fantastic run with Atom in netbooks, but the future is not looking nearly as bright as the segment is declining. Most recently, Intel pulled Atom out of smart TVs. Rumor has it that Intel just did not believe in Google’s ability to deliver a compelling software package that could take the TV manufacturer base by storm. Since 2008, Intel has been working on a competitive Atom chip for a smartphone, which has not surfaced yet. The tablet trend ran over Intel like a freight train. While Intel is betting big time on the tablet market – mostly because it cannot afford to be left out, should the tablet really turn out to be more than just an Apple and Amazon opportunity – we have not seen a blockbuster Atom chip for tablets in 2011. It will be critical for Intel to deliver such a processor in 2012 to move downmarket and meet ARM vendors before they can move further upmarket via Microsoft’s Windows 8 pipeline. My take? Intel cranks out its best chips when under pressure. Although I haven’t seen the new Atoms yet, I believe there is an 80 percent chance that Intel will surprise the tablet industry with a very capable chip.

5. Wii U

There is not much that we know about the Wii U yet. We may hear more at the GDC in March, get more information at the E3, and will be exposed to a continuous flow of information until the console is eventually released later in the year. It appears that Nintendo is selling lots of Wiis during this Christmas season, but it is being outsold by Microsoft, which is providing a direct upgrade path from the Wii controller to Kinect. In fact, Microsoft’s current success may be based on an environment in which the company is raiding the Wii user base. Nintendo is apparently betting on a tablet as an evolutionary controller, which may not be so evolutionary, but rather disruptive (and expensive). Given the current market situation and Nintendo’s financial state, the company has a great deal of incentive to take risks to be able to deliver a new game experience, but it does not have any room for failure. My take? I don’t have nearly enough information to make a guess.

4. Mozilla Firefox

Oh, Firefox! What is left of your rebel image? How you have let me down this year! Firefox had a slow start with the release of what was essentially an old browser out of the gate – Firefox 4. Mozilla continued with some hints of big UI and feature upgrades and an accelerated release process that made us believe that more features would be released in shorter time spans. Instead, we received plenty of new versions with a handful of upgrades that could have justified a Firefox 4.5 update, but not five completely new versions. More importantly, Mozilla managed to alienate its business users by telling them they do not count (a statement that was later revised in an effort to do damage control), and was more successful at delaying than releasing new features. Presently, Mozilla has slipped below Chrome’s market share, according to StatCounter. In 2012, Mozilla will have to make a 180 degree turn, reconsider its strategy and remember its roots. However, since we are already aware of more delays, and since we have not heard much about Boot-2-Gecko, I cannot be too optimistic. Mozilla could return to growth in the third or fourth quarter of 2012 if all goes well. Firefox is likely to sink in market share until then. There is only a slim chance for success in the near future.

3. 3D TV

We have been waiting for 3D TV for some time now, but the concepts have not been too convincing. Too few of us are willing to wear glasses and, realistically, the content available so far may not be reason enough for consumers to make the jump to a 3D TV. That could change in 2012 as we could be seeing the first serious naked-eye 3D TVs at the CES. Add interesting content from mainstream providers, including Disney, and 3D TV may be mature enough to succeed. My take? There is a 90 percent chance for 3D TV to breakthrough next year.

2. Blackberry and Windows Phone

Since the smartphone market is dominated by iOS and Android, what is happening to Blackberry and Windows Phone? Blackberrys have seen a dramatic decline in popularity in 2011, while Windows Phone was never able to gain any traction in the first place. RIM has a lot of work to do to sort out its smartphone platform and could be more likely to be acquired by a company like Oracle or HP than to be able to succeed in an environment that requires smartphone providers to offer not just a phone but a platform. While Apple, Google and Microsoft have cross-platform offerings, RIM does not and failed to establish a desktop product via the Playbook tablet. Windows Phone largely missed its target so far because of wrong product positioning in the beginning, but its opportunity is growing as Microsoft is embracing web applications, ARM architecture for Windows 8 tablets and a radically new operating system. It will be critical for Microsoft to integrate Windows Phone with Windows 8 tablets, Windows server infrastructures, and Windows 8. Conceivably, Windows Phone could become an extremely powerful product in such a scenario, especially if Nokia can come up with attractive hardware. My take? RIM will be acquired in 2012. Windows Phone has a 60 percent chance of gaining market share, if Microsoft integrates the platform with Windows 8.

1. Windows 8

Ultimately, most IT eyes may be on Windows 8 in 2012. Microsoft raised some attention this year when it introduced the touch user interface, which will be Windows 8’s main selling point into the mainstream market. Without touch, there are still major improvements under the hood that could be tough to explain to the consumer to help justify the cost for an upgrade. With touch, Microsoft is facing an uphill battle on notebooks and desktop computers, which, as mentioned above, just do not work well with touch. Microsoft is possibly dealing with a less than 100 percent supply of new touch-based computer systems anyway. Add to that a Windows Store that is clearly marketed to attract touch apps at this time, but may have limited exposure if those touch devices aren’t coming to market fast enough. Potentially, Windows 8 is Microsoft’s riskiest OS bet since 1994 (Windows 95). A risky play is exactly what the company needs. However, the proposition of Windows 8 does not make sense yet. There are gaps in Microsoft’s marketing as well as variables that could swing either way to turn Windows 8 into a success – or a failure. Given the fact that Microsoft needs Windows 8 as a platform component to succeed, it is reasonable to assume that the company will do its homework and make the new OS work. The alternative is that it simply throws Windows 8 on the market without the necessary hardware support with the hope that the market will buy into the touch hype. Such a strategy could turn into a disaster of Vista proportions.

Discuss
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the News comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 19 Hide
    digitalzom-b , January 17, 2012 3:19 PM
    Given the gas price forecast this year... I'd say electric cars/alternate energy transportation needs to evolve quicker.
  • 17 Hide
    house70 , January 17, 2012 3:50 PM
    Touch replacing KB/mouse for desktops? Good luck with that. Find an input that is superior to KB/mouse, not to mention touch, for desktops? Same.
  • 12 Hide
    whimseh , January 17, 2012 3:34 PM
    I only agree with about 1 of those.. the rest are pretty insignificant.
Other Comments
    Display all 48 comments.
  • 19 Hide
    digitalzom-b , January 17, 2012 3:19 PM
    Given the gas price forecast this year... I'd say electric cars/alternate energy transportation needs to evolve quicker.
  • 9 Hide
    Lord Captivus , January 17, 2012 3:33 PM
    i hope the LHC delivers something this year...
  • 12 Hide
    whimseh , January 17, 2012 3:34 PM
    I only agree with about 1 of those.. the rest are pretty insignificant.
  • -4 Hide
    memadmax , January 17, 2012 3:47 PM
    I have just got done picking thru the Windows 8 Developer preview and I freakin hate it...

    If this is what they are gonna use for the framework of Win8 then we are gonna be using Win7 for a long time......

    But Win8 does have a nifty new GUI based MultiBoot(menu) program....
  • 6 Hide
    memadmax , January 17, 2012 3:48 PM
    digitalzom-bGiven the gas price forecast this year... I'd say electric cars/alternate energy transportation needs to evolve quicker.


    It doesn't need to "evolve" it needs to be more affordable....
  • -4 Hide
    g4114rd0 , January 17, 2012 3:49 PM
     1 still cant see a virtual Tom's Performance Charts 3D Analyzer-Screen.
    The CPU, the motherboard, GPU and the RAM...
    in particular must be ... a Virtual Tom's budget.
  • 17 Hide
    house70 , January 17, 2012 3:50 PM
    Touch replacing KB/mouse for desktops? Good luck with that. Find an input that is superior to KB/mouse, not to mention touch, for desktops? Same.
  • 4 Hide
    zanny , January 17, 2012 3:53 PM
    digitalzom-bGiven the gas price forecast this year... I'd say electric cars/alternate energy transportation needs to evolve quicker.


    They did evolve. The US government was bought out in the 80s / 90s by big oil to cut funding for electric car research. OPEC wants gas prices high and a state of artificial scarcity since they have a nigh monopoly on our entire transport infrastructure.

    @ the list : I don't want new features in Firefox, I just want it fast, reduce the memory footprint, etc, and let the add ons do any additional features. As is, firefox works great. I have never had a reason to migrate to Chrome because I never felt Firefox was worse than it.

    Windows 8 is going to fail bad. Microsoft is trying to push touch screens and tablet interfaces onto mainstream computing (again, they did some of this crap with Vista) and it will fall on their face. The OS is still bloated as hell and slow, and I intend to completely switch over to Debian with Wine to play games this year since DX12 is no where to be seen so Wine is mostly usable with modern games. Anything else, I'll use my old copy of Vista I'm still on. No reason to upgrade Windows when all new versions do is shove crap down ones throat.

    The rest of it I really don't care about. I want to see fiber networks deployed more rapidly globally, but monopolies in the US are putting a damper on that.

    I don't expect much tech innovation to happen this year. We are aiming for another recession, and the US dollar might hyper inflate any day, so as long as Kepler, Southern Islands, and Ivy Bridge come out at reasonable price points with all the new tripping features like PCI3 for an upgrade this summer, and LED LCD prices stay low, and hopefully the mechanical disk market rapidly returns to old cost levels to complement rapidly dropping SSD prices, it will be a great summer to build a new PC at least.
  • 4 Hide
    CaedenV , January 17, 2012 3:56 PM
    digitalzom-bGiven the gas price forecast this year... I'd say electric cars/alternate energy transportation needs to evolve quicker.

    sure, but I doubt we will see anything big on that front in this year. Hopefully in 5 years we will see a bit of a change.
  • 6 Hide
    Anomalyx , January 17, 2012 3:58 PM
    digitalzom-bGiven the gas price forecast this year... I'd say electric cars/alternate energy transportation needs to evolve quicker.

    One electric car designer put it this way: Electric cars will never catch on until they can out-power gas cars. I think it's correct. They've out-mileage'd gas cars, and are (slowly) becoming more affordable. The only thing they haven't done is out-power gas cars.

    Plus, you have to think about power sources, too. Environmental nuts are all psyched up over electric cars, but they don't realize where that electricity comes from...
  • 3 Hide
    digitalzom-b , January 17, 2012 4:01 PM
    AnomalyxOne electric car designer put it this way: Electric cars will never catch on until they can out-power gas cars. I think it's correct. They've out-mileage'd gas cars, and are (slowly) becoming more affordable. The only thing they haven't done is out-power gas cars.Plus, you have to think about power sources, too. Environmental nuts are all psyched up over electric cars, but they don't realize where that electricity comes from...


    Well, that's why I mentioned alternate energy too. We could run cars off of A LOT of other stuff.
  • 2 Hide
    Doomsy2006 , January 17, 2012 4:03 PM
    Yeah...I'd agree with whimseh. These may be things that people want but most will in no way greatly enhance how humans progress in life and interact with each other. Most of these will only keep people away from others. These would not be things that NEED to happen this year in my book.

    I guess I just see different priorities than the need for some apps and a few pieces of hardware.
  • 3 Hide
    thehelix , January 17, 2012 4:11 PM
    I don't think 3D TV has to offer that much more.. The best way to watch a movie will always be on a good quality 2D tv. Glass - free 3d tv might improve but i dont think it will ever be adopted to that extend cause of the limited viewing angle.

    I believe what most people are really expecting is a "Holographic Display" , at which point it will surpass the narrow definitions of a television.
  • 1 Hide
    Anonymous , January 17, 2012 4:14 PM
    I´m surprised that nobody has talked about windows 8-kinetick pc combo; I supose it is the alternative to touch desktops.
  • 0 Hide
    hoof_hearted , January 17, 2012 4:20 PM
    Maybe a mini-kinect that projects a keyboard onto a flat surface and you just type on it.
  • 3 Hide
    acadia11 , January 17, 2012 4:45 PM
    Anybody else actually don't give a isht about 3d Tv. Come back to me when that thing is floating in the air.
  • 2 Hide
    Nakal , January 17, 2012 5:01 PM
    hoof_heartedMaybe a mini-kinect that projects a keyboard onto a flat surface and you just type on it.



    Like this:

    http://www.amazon.com/Celluon-LaserKey-CL850-Projection-Keyboard/dp/B0010SLSOS

  • 3 Hide
    mobrocket , January 17, 2012 5:08 PM
    digitalzom-bWell, that's why I mentioned alternate energy too. We could run cars off of A LOT of other stuff.


    what is sad is that electric cars are just as old as gas powered cars, but the tech was abandon for decades cus gas was so cheap...

    getting off gas is more about energy independence then enivorniment, then thou its easier to regulate pollution at once source then 10k
  • 2 Hide
    blackened144 , January 17, 2012 5:17 PM
    TheHelixI don't think 3D TV has to offer that much more.. The best way to watch a movie will always be on a good quality 2D tv. Glass - free 3d tv might improve but i dont think it will ever be adopted to that extend cause of the limited viewing angle.I believe what most people are really expecting is a "Holographic Display" , at which point it will surpass the narrow definitions of a television.

    3D depends a lot on your environment.. I went to visit my sister a few months ago and they had just won this 55" 3D TV.. It was originally set up in the finished basement because they didnt want to tear out their existing setup upstairs.. The couch in the basement is just barely far enough from the TV to be able to watch comfortably, maybe 6-8ft away and when I was watching 3D movies down there it was pretty dramatic since at that close range the TV takes up a large portion of your vision.. After a few days there though, I helped my BroInLaw put that TV and TV stand upstairs and brought the other one down.. Once the 3D TV was upstairs though the couch was like 15-30ft away from the TV depending on which seat you are in and it seriously changed the effects and it wasnt nearly as spectacular..
  • 11 Hide
    supall , January 17, 2012 5:36 PM
    I am probably in the minority here, but I am hoping AMD makes a turnaround this year. Possibly improve his CPU architecture?
Display more comments