All about Graphics Cards
 Latest Graphics Cards articles
All Graphics Cards articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
action : Yoyo the Star Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
Ads

Sponsored links

Unreal Tournament, Mass Effect, And GRID

Previous Next
1:50 AM - 08/12/2008 by Florian Charpentier

Unreal Tournament III

The Radeon HD 4870 X2 cuts through Unreal Tournament 3 with ease. It establishes a marked advantage in this title; 76% over the Radeon HD 4870 (excluding 1920x1200 again) and 35% over the GeForce GTX 280. Here again the 3870 X2 doesn’t shine through all that much, kind of like the 9800 GX2 and its less-than-adequate 512 MB of memory.

Mass Effect

Still based on the Unreal Engine 3, but modified slightly by Bioware, Mass Effect displays results largely mirror those of Unreal Tournament 3. Here also, the Radeon HD 4870 and 3870 X2 take sizable performance hits once the anti-aliasing is activated, ensuring that the 4870 X2 stays ahead of the pack. The GeForce GTX 280 puts up a fight at 1920x1200, but the gap increases to 30% at 2560x1600 with anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering turned on.

Race Driver GRID

Already, the Radeon HD 4870 has impressed us. It’s thus without surprise that we find the 4870 X2 largely ahead, even if we must say that the GeForce 9800 GX2 has greatly improved as well with regards to its previous drivers (the scores doubled). Clearly, it’s at 2560x1600 that the 4870 X2 takes off (once the anti-aliasing is turned on). Its advantage over the competition climbs to 93% versus AMD’s 4870 and 99% against the GeForce GTX 280.

Talkback
randomizer 08/12/2008 8:37 AM
Hide
-2+

How's the microstutter?

tipmen 08/12/2008 8:40 AM
Hide
-2+

Good job ATI/AMD! really good card you have here lets hope its cheaper then the GTX 280. I'm glad i waited it out now i can replace my old setup. Now i will get new X48 board and 2 of these puppys and im sure I need a better power supply I don't think a 750 watt will do it.

kite212 08/12/2008 8:49 AM
Hide
-0+

looks like i need a new mobo and a bigger case to fit this beast

Anonymous 08/12/2008 9:08 AM
Show
Cmhone 08/12/2008 9:14 AM
Hide
-2+

It says at the end of the article their power meter went kaput, and also not to expect much in the power consumption department anyways.

neiroatopelcc 08/12/2008 9:29 AM
Hide
-0+

Someone explain to me what this means in english?
"Back when we tested the Radeon HD 3870 X2, we found that the biggest impact on performance was attributable to the board’s memory capacity, since memory on a bi-GPU card has to be divided in two. And in order to assure adequate performance, you often have to multiply the quantity of memory by four, which is what AMD does with the 4870 X2." from page 1

romulus47plus1 08/12/2008 9:32 AM
Hide
-4+

I can smell incoming price drops...

Anonymous 08/12/2008 9:33 AM
Hide
-6+

It's nice to see AMD/ATI challange nVidia again, it's been too long nVidias market. My take is that this situation can only benefit the consumers; push for faster GPU's to more affordable prices. It will be interesting to see nVidias run to retake the performance as well as the midrange price/performance crown.

randomizer 08/12/2008 9:52 AM
Hide
-3+

neiroatopelcc :
Someone explain to me what this means in english? "Back when we tested the Radeon HD 3870 X2, we found that the biggest impact on performance was attributable to the board’s memory capacity, since memory on a bi-GPU card has to be divided in two. And in order to assure adequate performance, you often have to multiply the quantity of memory by four, which is what AMD does with the 4870 X2." from page 1

The HD3870X2 had only 2x512MB memory, and each GPU could only access 512MB, which held its performance back. Although I think it should say "doubled", not "quadrupled", since the HD4870X2 has 2x1GB.

Thurin 08/12/2008 10:01 AM
Show
Thurin 08/12/2008 10:05 AM
Hide
-2+

Thurin :
The reason I responded with such diligence and ferocity is NOT because I hate Tomshardware



I'd like to stress that fact, as I read Tomshardware every day and have always enjoyed reading the news articles, however I would like the news to be as unbiased as possible and lately it seems Toms has been slipping a little.

.............................
-= Michael Out =-

thepinkpanther 08/12/2008 10:17 AM
Hide
-2+

$500+ for 2 gpus with 1gb memory each? i guess its worth. I usually never spend more than $300 for a card so i guess ill still wait till the 1gb 4870 comes out. I think the 260gtx would have been worth it, if it had dx10.1...even thought i dont know what the .1 does.

Thurin 08/12/2008 10:20 AM
Hide
-4+

The 10.1 is just an extended graphics capability suite including all features and extras that were planned for dx10 in the first place but couldn't be included in the primary release.

( hence the relatively small difference between dx9 and dx10 and dx10 games being cracked to work on dx9 machines with all the same effects save for the few bits of eyecandy that make up the difference between dx9 and dx10 )

ZootyGray 08/12/2008 10:58 AM
Show
Thurin 08/12/2008 11:16 AM
Hide
-0+

Reading is an art too Zooty *winks*

It's not a flame post towards Ati, and Ati does win, for now... at high costs.

before the month is over, Nvidia will win again at high costs... This is the cost of progress.

I;m not on either side, whichever is best I'll go for... I'm promoting and supporting the battle between the two industrial giants.

Take one out of the race and progress will become lethargic, dead slow and the prices will be insane... even more insane than they are already...

But if you choose to see me or my posts in a narrow minded way resembling the likes of what you just exhibited, then by all means go right ahead. You are entitled to your opinion.

However you may want to try and keep it a bit more decent.

(side note: using some mutated version of hackz0r 1337-speak or whatever this bit of slang is will not improve your standing with me or anyone else I wager... Try keeping it clean and I have no problems discussing any of the matters at hand with you.)

Brashen 08/12/2008 11:27 AM
Hide
-0+

Yes yes yes YES!!! I'm an Nvidia user by heart but this is........(tear) YES!!!

deadliest 08/12/2008 11:46 AM
Show
deadliest 08/12/2008 11:46 AM
Show
pulasky 08/12/2008 11:48 AM
Show
Vorador_21 08/12/2008 11:49 AM
Hide
-15+

Dear Sir,
I admire your efforts to show the maximum possible both as description and tests and I would like to ask a couple of questions:
1. Is it possible to show the same tests but with AMD configuration?
2. Is it possible to show the same tests but with at least 8AA/16AF and soft shadows, dynamic lights, plus description of other visual options?
In appropriate for you time I shall expect your answer.
The reason to spend so much in time, research and money by my humble opinion is to offer the best possible and realistic images on the clients and gamers. Please, forgive my words but to have such video cards and test them only with 4AA/4AF is ... a shame. I save as much as possible and when I upgrade something I chose carefully the best I could afford.
Thank you in advance for your co-operation.
Yours faithfully
Vorador_21


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links