All about Motherboards
 Latest Motherboards articles
All Motherboards articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
Ads

Sponsored links

Expectations

Previous Next
1:05 PM - 07/02/2001 by Thomas Pabst

Nobody will be surprised if i845 plus PC133 won't be able to reach the scores of i850 plus RDRAM. The question however is, how much of a performance decrease we will actually see. Applications that rely on high memory bandwidth will suffer, while applications that require short latencies might not perform much worse than on i850.

I also threw my recent Tualatin-results into the equation to see if Pentium 4 plus i845 and PC133 SDRAM is still faster than Pentium III Tualatin. If the latter should not be the case it is very difficult to see a major sense behind the existence of i845/PC133.

Test Setup

Pentium 4 i845 System
Motherboard Not disclosed
Memory 256 MB Wichmann WorkX PC133 SDRAM 2-2-2-5/7
Pentium 4 System
Motherboard Asus P4T, BIOS 1005 beta 1
Memory 256 MB Samsung PC800 RDRAM
Athlon 266 MHz FSB System
Motherboard MSI K7 Master MS-6341, BIOS 1.1
Memory 256 MB Infineon PC2100 DDR SDRAM 8-8-5-2-2-2-2
Pentium III System
Motherboard MSI 815 EPT Pro, BIOS rev. 1.0
Memory 256 MB PC150 SDRAM
Other System Components
Hard Drive IBM DTLA-307030, 7200 RPM, ATA100
Graphics Card NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra, Driver 12.40
Operating Systems Microsoft Windows 98 SE
Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional Service Pack 2
Screen Resolution 1024x768x16x85
1280x1024x32x85 for SPECviewperf 6.1.2
Talkback
Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links