Best offers
|
P7P55D Motherboard (Intel Socket H... | $149.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A785TD-V EVO AMD 785G/SB710 Socket... | $99.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD4P Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $169.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD3R Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $139.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A78T-E Motherboard (AMD, AM3, AMD... | $129.99 Newegg.com More info |
- motherboards benchmark
- benchmark my system
- best hdd benchmark
- how do you increase system performance
- motherboard performance benchmark
- hdd benchmarking
- direct3d benchmark
- quake on windows nt
- video card performance benchmarks
- motherboard benchmarking
- hdd benchmark comparatives
- product id number for monster truck madness
- monster truck madness product id
- dos benchmark
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
Sponsored links
I think there are thousands of benchmarks around nowadays, but not all of them are a real help. I admit that every benchmark is of some kind of help in case you want to tweak your own system. They show you which configuration is slower and which is faster, as long as you only change one variable. However, in case you want to compare your system performance to others, the number of useful benchmarks is shrinking down a lot. It doesn't help if your system reaches a higher 3DBench score than that of your neighbour, but your games or your Excel runs much slower than his. What you need is a benchmark that gives you real world performance in numbers. There are certainly some areas, where you want to have the performance of only one or a little number of system components, but here you also should be careful what you use. I still think it's best to know how a 'one component' benchmark is working, before I'm shouting 'Halleluja' about high scores, which may be entirely meaningless.
Real World Performance Benchmarks
- Windows 32 Bit Business Applications
- Windows 16 Bit Business Applications
-
- Winstone 96, which is not officially available anymore
- DOS Games
- Direct3D Windows 95 Games
Component Performance Benchmarks
- Memory Performance
- Video Card 2D Performance
- Video Card DOS Performance
-
- profile.exe coming with SDD
- Harddisk Performance
- Harddisk Interface Performance
- CDROM Performance
There are quite a few benchmarks, which I disapprove . These are Landmark , Norton System Information , the HDD benchmark of WinTune 95 and also the completely abstract 'busperf ', which btw is 11 years old. There are more useless benchmarks around, but I'm tired of naming all of them. There is one other popular benchmark which is fairly questionable, CPU16 and CPU32 coming with Winbench97 . What are the results of these benchmarks telling us? Well, a number - that's about it!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Build Now or Wait for Nehalem?
- Intel a scammer?
- IBM Unveils New x86 Servers With Quad-Core AMD Opteron(TM) Processors
- Do intell dual and quad core processors support hyper threading??
- Something to think about
- Comparing Water Coolers: We Follow Your Lead
- Should I replace my AMD-K6 3D PROCESSOR
- slava's enhancing system performance guide
- Intel is cutting off making the Prescott???
- slava's enhancing system performance guide
- slava's enhancing system performance thread
- build a new system or upgrade????
- TX97-XV Bios Switch from Phoenix to Award
- 8K3A - Need install tips
Related news
- Windows Performance Rating for Vista examined
- TechEd 2006: Microsoft preps flash-based "performance accelerators" for Vista
- Core i7 Incompatible With Performance DDR3 Memory
- Vista computers to have five performance tiers, not two, says ATI executive
- New Technologies For Television Backlighting Point To Better Performance, Says ISuppli





