Page 1:New Thumb Drives With eSATA And High Capacities
Page 2: Introducing eSATA… Kind of
Page 3:128 GB And USB 2.0: Kingston Data Traveler 200
Page 4: 32 GB, eSATA/USB: Maxell Solid State Drive
Page 5:8 GB, eSATA/USB: OCZ Throttle eSATA Flash Drive
Page 6: 32 GB Silicon Power eSATA/USB SSD
Page 7:Test Setup And Access Time
Page 8:Throughput Results
Page 9:I/O Performance Results
Silicon Power and OCZ seem to be using similar flash configurations, as they perform alike in eSATA mode—the difference is only 1-2 MB/s—while Maxell falls a bit behind. Using USB 2.0 shows OCZ and Kingston doing the best job, followed by Maxell and Silicon Power, which do not take advantage of USB 2.0’s maximum speed.
Although Maxell failed to impress in the read tests, it dominates in writes, together with Silicon Power. In this test, the 8 GB OCZ drive falls behind, especially in minimum transfer rates, in which it drops to only 13.7 MB/s on eSATA. Hence, it does not truly seem to be capitalizing on the eSATA interface for write operations. Most other drives write quicker, especially the Maxell device and Silicon Power’s thumb drive.
Interface performance determines the peak throughput of each device/interface.
- New Thumb Drives With eSATA And High Capacities
- Introducing eSATA… Kind of
- 128 GB And USB 2.0: Kingston Data Traveler 200
- 32 GB, eSATA/USB: Maxell Solid State Drive
- 8 GB, eSATA/USB: OCZ Throttle eSATA Flash Drive
- 32 GB Silicon Power eSATA/USB SSD
- Test Setup And Access Time
- Throughput Results
- I/O Performance Results