Best offers
|
P7P55D Motherboard (Intel Socket H... | $149.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A785TD-V EVO AMD 785G/SB710 Socket... | $99.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD4P Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $169.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD3R Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $139.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Motherboard (Intel Socket 478, Intel... | $79.95 Sillworks.com More info |
Related Content
- cpu benchmark tomshardware
- tomshardware benchmark
- tomshardware benchmarks
- test cpu tomshardware
- what s ich10 southbridge
- video card benchmarks tomshardware
- new premiere pro transitions
- tomshardware benchmark video card
- sandra xi arithmetic
- processor benchmarks tomshardware
- online cpu benchmark tomshardware
- mp3 encoder for windows media player
- sisoft sandra xi
- serious sam 2 how to benchmark
- to get the best quality in adobe premiere pro 2.0
Partners
The Games selection
adventure :
Ray
Adventure game, South Park style. Pick the way the story goes by picking an answer among those offered.
|
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
Ads
Sponsored links
4:00 AM - 07/10/2008 by
Patrick Schmid and Achim Roos
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (32) |
- Share
| Quake 4 | Version 1.3 Final |
|---|---|
| Video Mode: 1280x1024 | |
| Video Quality: Game Default | |
| Benchmark I: THG Timedemo | |
| Benchmark II: platnettimedemo id_demo001 | |
| Unreal Tournament 2004 | Version 3369 |
| UMark: 2.0.0 | |
| Video Mode: 1280x1024 | |
| High Image Quality | |
| Bots: 16 | |
| Benchmark: AS-Junkyard | |
| Serious Sam 2 | Version 2.070 |
| Video Mode: 1024x768 | |
| HDR Rendering: off | |
| Renderer: Direct3D | |
| Filtering Mode: None | |
| Anti-aliasing Mode: None | |
| Benchmark: Greendale | |
| Prey | Version 1.3 |
| Video Mode: 1280x1024 | |
| Video Quality: Game Default | |
| Vsync: Off | |
| Benchmark: THG-Demo | |
| iTunes 7.2 | Version 7.1.1.5 |
| Audio CD "Terminator II SE," 53 min. | |
| High Quality (160 kbps) | |
| Lame MP3 | Version 3.98 Beta 3 |
| Audio CD "Terminator II SE," 53 min. | |
| Wave to MP3 | |
| 160 kbps | |
| Pinnacle Studio 11 Plus | Version : 11.0.0.5082 |
| Encoding and Transition Rendering | |
| Private MPEG-2-Cam-Movie | |
| Video: 720x480, NTSC, 6000 kb/s | |
| Audio: MPEG Layer 2, 224 kb/s, 16-bit Stereo, 48 kHz | |
| File Type: MPEG-2 | |
| TMPEG 4.2 | Version: 4.2.10.211 |
| File Import | |
| Terminator II SE DVD (720x576), 16x9, 2 min. | |
| Dolby Digital, 48 kHz | |
| Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder | |
| DivX | Version: 6.6.1 |
| Insane Quality | |
| Enhanced Multi-threading | |
| XviD | Version: 1.1.2 |
| Target Quantizer: 1.00 | |
| Mainconcept H.264 Encoder | Version 2.0 |
| MPEG2 to MPEG2 | |
| 24 sec. HDTV 1920x1080 | |
| Audio: MPEG Layer 2 | |
| Stream: Transport | |
| Codec: H.264 | |
| Profile: High | |
| Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 | Version: 2.0 |
| NTSC MPEG-2 HDTV 1920x1080, 24 sec | |
| Export: Adobe Media Encoder | |
| Windows Media Encoder 9.1 | Version: 9.1 |
| Advanced Profile | |
| Maximum Bitrate: 2000 kb/s | |
| Image Quality: 50.00 | |
| Windows Audio Encoder 10 | Version 10 |
| One Encoding Pass | |
| Bitrate Mode: Constant | |
| Audio Format: 160 kb/s, 44.1 kHz, 16-bit | |
| Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus | Version 7.5.467 |
| Scan: Vista Enterprise (Windows Folder, 8GB) | |
| Virus Base: 269.6.1/776 | |
| WinRAR | Version 3.70 Beta 8 |
| Compression = Best | |
| Dictionary = 4096 KB | |
| Benchmark: THG Workload | |
| Maxon Cinema 4D Release 10 | Version 10.008 |
| Rendering scene "Water drop at a Rose" | |
| Resolution: 1280x1024 - 8-bit (50 frames) | |
| Adobe Photoshop CS3 | Version: 10.0x20070321 |
| Filtering a 69MB TIF Photo | |
| Benchmark: Tomshardware -Benchmark V1.0.0.4 | |
| Programmed by Tomshardware using Delphi 2006 | |
| Adobe Acrobat 7 Professional | Version: 7.0.9 |
| Settings: High Quality Print | |
| Compatibility: Acrobat 8 (PDF 1.7) | |
| Security: High | |
| Microsoft PowerPoint 2007 | Version: 2007 |
| PPT to PDF | |
| PowerPoint Document, 115 pages | |
| Deep Fritz | Version: Nov. 16, 2006 |
| 3DMark06 | Version: 1.10 |
| 1280x1024—32-bit | |
| Graphics and CPU Default Benchmark | |
| PCMark05 Pro | Version: 1.2.0 |
| CPU and Memory Tests | |
| Windows Media Player 10.00.00.3646 | |
| Windows Media Encoder 9.00.00.2980 | |
| SiSoft Sandra XI SP1c | Version 2007.5.11.40 |
| CPU Test = CPU Arithmetic / Multi-media | |
| Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark |
Topics being discussed on the forums
- SLI on intel p45 chipset [Graphic & Displays]
- Will a single 8800 GT perform to next summer. [Graphic & Displays]
- *Guide to Choosing Parts* [Homebuilt Systems]
- Which chipset is best for a EVGA 6800-GT? [Graphic & Displays]
- Down to two different Rigs. Please Help choose. [Homebuilt Systems]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Best Motherboard for E8500
- Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide
- HOWTO: Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - Guide v1.6.1
- What is the best way to overclock the Q9650?
- Xigmatek HDT-S1283 on a E8400 in a P5Q-E
- Gigabyte EP45T-UD3P random freeze
- Upgraded RAM and the Vista Experience Score went down
- Help choosing Mobo
- Motherboard help?
- A good stable mb for intel quad
- *Guide to Choosing Parts*
- 1st build gaming rig - advice appreciated
- $840 Budget, Omfg herlp!
- $500.00 upgrade budget whats the smart thing to do






Not sure most readers here care about power consumption, although we all will need to start soon. Pretty sure the P5Q-E supports BOTH PCI-E 16x1 OR 8x2.
I'm not sure the power consumption comparison is completely fair towards the P45 cipset. The used P35 motherboard has 6 phases, if I'm not mistaken, while the P5Q-E and EP45-DQ6 have 8 and 12 phases respectively. I would have loved to see a power consumption survey that took this into account.
However, you definitely proved a point. One would expect that the power consumption went down with the die-shrink. Not up or stay at the same level.
Considering what the video, cpu use, I could care less about mb wattage. When the other stuff gets a lot lower I'll care, till then zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
I'm not sure the power consumption comparison is completely fair towards the P45 cipset. The used P35 motherboard has 6 phases, if I'm not mistaken, while the P5Q-E and EP45-DQ6 have 8 and 12 phases respectively. I would have loved to see a power consumption survey that took this into account.However, you definitely proved a point. One would expect that the power consumption went down with the die-shrink. Not up or stay at the same level.
There was no die shrink? All the extra power is going to be coming from the PCI-E 2.0...And,I know I'm going to shock people!But,10 watts isn't shit!
So PCI-E 2.0 is not worth having right now, is it? I mean if i had a HD4850 card would it make a difference with PCI-E 2.0 and PIC-E 1? Now P45 boards cost much more than P35 and seeing as it delivers no performance gain, i think P35 is the way to go.
And yes, 10watt difference is a lot, really.
I have the P5Q-E and it DOSE support 8x 8x PCIe 2.0 CrossFire. I know this for a fact as I am running it right now. Hell, you could even add in another 4850 in the lower slot at 4x PCIe 1. Come on Toms team. Also, what about relitave CrossFire performance compared to the X38/48? I have been dying for this article from you guys just for that comparison.
The power consumption is important but you can't make a definite conclusion about P35 vs P45 from just two motherboards. Power consumption even on the same chipset varies a lot between motherboards. Maybe try the Gigabyte P5Q-E (just guessing from the reasonably sized heatsinks)?
There's no point in buying a p45 or an x48 if you already have the p35/x38. Wait for Nehalem!
What I really would like to see is a P35/P45 vs X38/X48 mashup!
^Agreed! In some cases the P45 beats the X38 when it comes to OCing (ie high stable FSBs on P45)
I think there's a typo descriping the type of memory supported by the MSI P45 Diamond motherboard. It states "The Diamond version supports DDR2 instead of DDR3, which makes sense at this time. ". The Diamond only supports DDR3.
I see nothing wrong with the "small" improvements added to the P45 series. The P45 boards are the same price as the P35 with the small improvements. They won't awe the hardcore gamer, but improvements to power management is cool for everyone.

What we really need now is for the price of DDR3 (which will save around 4 watts) to drop from the sky.
I look forward to seeing how the new integrated graphics of the G45 perform.
This review has very different results for power consumption.
It shows the P45 using quite a bit less than the P35.
When combined with the opposite results you are seeing, It appears the issue may be in the boards you tested and not the P45 chipset itself.
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/1 [...] index.html
There's no point in buying a p45 or an x48 if you already have the p35/x38. Wait for Nehalem!
Agreed. Well said.
Hey AUTHOR:
Can you post/send your overclocking setting or asus o.c. profile so I can see your setup. I just got the board and wanna see how I can do on the newest BIOS. Thanks!
I plan to order a new build based on Q9450 and 4850 GPU. I was going to choose P45 (P5Q) since I do not plan to overclock nor do I plan to crossfire. I get PCIE 2.0 and the most stable chipset possible for this build. The X48 would be wasted $$$ and overkill. Not sure why this conclusion was missing from the article.
i would have rather liked to know more about amd's new 7 series chipsets. there is VERY little documentation/benchmarks on them. It would be awesome to see a "performance/price" review on very comparable motherboards changing pretty much ONLY the chipset. I would like a 790fx, but thus far i havn't been able to find a whole lot of comparison data telling me that the difference (other than more video card support) between "x" and "fx" or even the 770 for that matter (770=no crossfirex/sli)
ANYWHO chipsets seem to be pretty under the radar, and kudo's for actually paying attention to them. Now for those new fangled amd ones? :-p
Biostar Tpower I45? .. how did you manage to leave that board out, cheap and proberly the best board around?
Agreed they really should have tested the Biostar Tpower I45 and/or TForce TP43D2A7 since they both claim record breaking OC performance and aren't really any more expensive than other P43/P45 boards to buy. I personally have the TForce TP43D2A7 and while I've only run it up to 400bus speed 1600fsb it's very stable and a great deal for the price point plus supports the newer Intel processors which in and of itself is nice compared to some of the P35 motherboards which require a bios update first. PCI 2.0 will only become more important in the future as well, but that was basically mentioned anyway.
Biostar Tpower I45? .. how did you manage to leave that board out, cheap and proberly the best board around?
Keep your eyes peeled, we plan to look at this one in an upcoming roundup!