All about Motherboards
 Latest Motherboards articles
All Motherboards articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : Interactive Buddy Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
Ads

Sponsored links

Benchmarks and Settings

Previous Next
4:00 AM - 07/10/2008 by Patrick Schmid and Achim Roos
Benchmarks and Settings
Quake 4 Version 1.3 Final
Video Mode: 1280x1024
Video Quality: Game Default
Benchmark I: THG Timedemo
Benchmark II: platnettimedemo id_demo001
Unreal Tournament 2004 Version 3369
UMark: 2.0.0
Video Mode: 1280x1024
High Image Quality
Bots: 16
Benchmark: AS-Junkyard
Serious Sam 2 Version 2.070
Video Mode: 1024x768
HDR Rendering: off
Renderer: Direct3D
Filtering Mode: None
Anti-aliasing Mode: None
Benchmark: Greendale
Prey Version 1.3
Video Mode: 1280x1024
Video Quality: Game Default
Vsync: Off
Benchmark: THG-Demo
iTunes 7.2 Version 7.1.1.5
Audio CD "Terminator II SE," 53 min.
High Quality (160 kbps)
Lame MP3 Version 3.98 Beta 3
Audio CD "Terminator II SE," 53 min.
Wave to MP3
160 kbps
Pinnacle Studio 11 Plus Version : 11.0.0.5082
Encoding and Transition Rendering
Private MPEG-2-Cam-Movie
Video: 720x480, NTSC, 6000 kb/s
Audio: MPEG Layer 2, 224 kb/s, 16-bit Stereo, 48 kHz
File Type: MPEG-2
TMPEG 4.2 Version: 4.2.10.211
File Import
Terminator II SE DVD (720x576), 16x9, 2 min.
Dolby Digital, 48 kHz
Advanced Acoustic Engine MP3 Encoder
DivX Version: 6.6.1
Insane Quality
Enhanced Multi-threading
XviD Version: 1.1.2
Target Quantizer: 1.00
Mainconcept H.264 Encoder Version 2.0
MPEG2 to MPEG2
24 sec. HDTV 1920x1080
Audio: MPEG Layer 2
Stream: Transport
Codec: H.264
Profile: High
Adobe Premiere Pro 2.0 Version: 2.0
NTSC MPEG-2 HDTV 1920x1080, 24 sec
Export: Adobe Media Encoder
Windows Media Encoder 9.1 Version: 9.1
Advanced Profile
Maximum Bitrate: 2000 kb/s
Image Quality: 50.00
Windows Audio Encoder 10 Version 10
One Encoding Pass
Bitrate Mode: Constant
Audio Format: 160 kb/s, 44.1 kHz, 16-bit
Grisoft AVG Anti-Virus Version 7.5.467
Scan: Vista Enterprise (Windows Folder, 8GB)
Virus Base: 269.6.1/776
WinRAR Version 3.70 Beta 8
Compression = Best
Dictionary = 4096 KB
Benchmark: THG Workload
Maxon Cinema 4D Release 10 Version 10.008
Rendering scene "Water drop at a Rose"
Resolution: 1280x1024 - 8-bit (50 frames)
Adobe Photoshop CS3 Version: 10.0x20070321
Filtering a 69MB TIF Photo
Benchmark: Tomshardware -Benchmark V1.0.0.4
Programmed by Tomshardware using Delphi 2006
Adobe Acrobat 7 Professional Version: 7.0.9
Settings: High Quality Print
Compatibility: Acrobat 8 (PDF 1.7)
Security: High
Microsoft PowerPoint 2007 Version: 2007
PPT to PDF
PowerPoint Document, 115 pages
Deep Fritz Version: Nov. 16, 2006
3DMark06 Version: 1.10
1280x1024—32-bit
Graphics and CPU Default Benchmark
PCMark05 Pro Version: 1.2.0
CPU and Memory Tests
Windows Media Player 10.00.00.3646
Windows Media Encoder 9.00.00.2980
SiSoft Sandra XI SP1c Version 2007.5.11.40
CPU Test = CPU Arithmetic / Multi-media
Memory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark
Talkback
Proximon 07/10/2008 11:35 AM
Hide
--2+

Not sure most readers here care about power consumption, although we all will need to start soon. Pretty sure the P5Q-E supports BOTH PCI-E 16x1 OR 8x2.

Strid 07/10/2008 11:39 AM
Hide
-3+

I'm not sure the power consumption comparison is completely fair towards the P45 cipset. The used P35 motherboard has 6 phases, if I'm not mistaken, while the P5Q-E and EP45-DQ6 have 8 and 12 phases respectively. I would have loved to see a power consumption survey that took this into account.
However, you definitely proved a point. One would expect that the power consumption went down with the die-shrink. Not up or stay at the same level.

royalcrown 07/10/2008 11:56 AM
Hide
--1+

Considering what the video, cpu use, I could care less about mb wattage. When the other stuff gets a lot lower I'll care, till then zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

dragunover 07/10/2008 12:52 PM
Hide
--1+

strid :
I'm not sure the power consumption comparison is completely fair towards the P45 cipset. The used P35 motherboard has 6 phases, if I'm not mistaken, while the P5Q-E and EP45-DQ6 have 8 and 12 phases respectively. I would have loved to see a power consumption survey that took this into account.However, you definitely proved a point. One would expect that the power consumption went down with the die-shrink. Not up or stay at the same level.


There was no die shrink? All the extra power is going to be coming from the PCI-E 2.0...And,I know I'm going to shock people!But,10 watts isn't shit!

aleluja 07/10/2008 1:50 PM
Hide
-1+

So PCI-E 2.0 is not worth having right now, is it? I mean if i had a HD4850 card would it make a difference with PCI-E 2.0 and PIC-E 1? Now P45 boards cost much more than P35 and seeing as it delivers no performance gain, i think P35 is the way to go.
And yes, 10watt difference is a lot, really.

outlw6669 07/10/2008 3:20 PM
Hide
-3+

I have the P5Q-E and it DOSE support 8x 8x PCIe 2.0 CrossFire. I know this for a fact as I am running it right now. Hell, you could even add in another 4850 in the lower slot at 4x PCIe 1. Come on Toms team. Also, what about relitave CrossFire performance compared to the X38/48? I have been dying for this article from you guys just for that comparison.

Anonymous 07/10/2008 3:43 PM
Hide
-0+

The power consumption is important but you can't make a definite conclusion about P35 vs P45 from just two motherboards. Power consumption even on the same chipset varies a lot between motherboards. Maybe try the Gigabyte P5Q-E (just guessing from the reasonably sized heatsinks)?

Haiku214 07/10/2008 4:31 PM
Hide
-3+

There's no point in buying a p45 or an x48 if you already have the p35/x38. Wait for Nehalem!

zedweb 07/10/2008 4:52 PM
Hide
-1+

What I really would like to see is a P35/P45 vs X38/X48 mashup!

shadow703793 07/10/2008 5:31 PM
Hide
-1+

^Agreed! In some cases the P45 beats the X38 when it comes to OCing (ie high stable FSBs on P45)

chaugh 07/10/2008 5:56 PM
Hide
--1+

I think there's a typo descriping the type of memory supported by the MSI P45 Diamond motherboard. It states "The Diamond version supports DDR2 instead of DDR3, which makes sense at this time. ". The Diamond only supports DDR3.

DXRick 07/10/2008 7:23 PM
Hide
-2+

I see nothing wrong with the "small" improvements added to the P45 series. The P45 boards are the same price as the P35 with the small improvements. They won't awe the hardcore gamer, but improvements to power management is cool for everyone. :)

What we really need now is for the price of DDR3 (which will save around 4 watts) to drop from the sky. :P

I look forward to seeing how the new integrated graphics of the G45 perform.

zenmaster 07/10/2008 7:36 PM
Hide
-2+

This review has very different results for power consumption.
It shows the P45 using quite a bit less than the P35.

When combined with the opposite results you are seeing, It appears the issue may be in the boards you tested and not the P45 chipset itself.

http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/1 [...] index.html

shadow703793 07/10/2008 7:38 PM
Hide
-1+

Haiku214 :
There's no point in buying a p45 or an x48 if you already have the p35/x38. Wait for Nehalem!


Agreed. Well said.

gwolfman 07/10/2008 7:57 PM
Hide
--2+

Hey AUTHOR:
Can you post/send your overclocking setting or asus o.c. profile so I can see your setup. I just got the board and wanna see how I can do on the newest BIOS. Thanks!

jthorn 07/10/2008 10:28 PM
Hide
--3+

I plan to order a new build based on Q9450 and 4850 GPU. I was going to choose P45 (P5Q) since I do not plan to overclock nor do I plan to crossfire. I get PCIE 2.0 and the most stable chipset possible for this build. The X48 would be wasted $$$ and overkill. Not sure why this conclusion was missing from the article.

nachowarrior 07/11/2008 12:16 PM
Hide
-3+

i would have rather liked to know more about amd's new 7 series chipsets. there is VERY little documentation/benchmarks on them. It would be awesome to see a "performance/price" review on very comparable motherboards changing pretty much ONLY the chipset. I would like a 790fx, but thus far i havn't been able to find a whole lot of comparison data telling me that the difference (other than more video card support) between "x" and "fx" or even the 770 for that matter (770=no crossfirex/sli)
ANYWHO chipsets seem to be pretty under the radar, and kudo's for actually paying attention to them. Now for those new fangled amd ones? :-p

Sined 07/11/2008 12:17 PM
Hide
-0+

Biostar Tpower I45? .. how did you manage to leave that board out, cheap and proberly the best board around?

knowom 07/11/2008 1:02 AM
Hide
-2+

Agreed they really should have tested the Biostar Tpower I45 and/or TForce TP43D2A7 since they both claim record breaking OC performance and aren't really any more expensive than other P43/P45 boards to buy. I personally have the TForce TP43D2A7 and while I've only run it up to 400bus speed 1600fsb it's very stable and a great deal for the price point plus supports the newer Intel processors which in and of itself is nice compared to some of the P35 motherboards which require a bios update first. PCI 2.0 will only become more important in the future as well, but that was basically mentioned anyway.

cangelini 07/11/2008 6:25 AM
Hide
-0+

Sined :
Biostar Tpower I45? .. how did you manage to leave that board out, cheap and proberly the best board around?



Keep your eyes peeled, we plan to look at this one in an upcoming roundup!


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links