Performance Benchmarks: Adobe Flash
GUIMark 2: Flash Vector Charting
This benchmark is nearly a four-way tie for first place. Opera, Firefox, IE9, and Safari all score between 59 and 60 frames per second. Chrome places a last, but with a respectable score of 46 FPS.
GUIMark 2: Flash Bitmap Gaming
The bitmap gaming portion of the GUIMark 2 Flash test is another close call. IE9, Opera, and Safari come in first, second, and third, all scoring between 50 and 52 FPS. Chrome takes fourth, while Firefox fills fifth. However both browsers perform well at nearly 42 FPS.
GUIMark 2: Flash Text Column
Opera claims victory over Apple Safari by a fraction of a frame per second. IE9 comes in at third, one frame behind Safari. Firefox takes fourth with slightly over 28 FPS, while Chrome brings up the rear with just under 27 FPS.
Flash Benchmark '08
Despite the date in its name, Flash Benchmark '08 is a new addition to the WBGP. It was added because it very closely resembles the average browser-based Flash game, and runs using four different levels of detail settings.
Continuing its strong showing in Flash, the new Internet Explorer 9 beats second-place finisher Safari by over 100 points in Flash Benchmark '08. Opera establishes a solid third-place finish, with Chrome and Firefox rounding out the bottom.
- 1 / 13
- Next
-
Latest Software News
Latest Software reviews
-
Latest Microsoft News
- Steve Ballmer Has an 80-inch Windows 8 Tablet in His Office
- Nokia Lumia 610 Arriving in UK Next Week
- Specs for Dell's Windows 8 Clover Trail Tablet Leaked
- Microsoft: Windows 8 Can Boot Up Too Quickly
- Microsoft Talks Multi-Monitor Support in Windows 8
-
Latest Microsoft reviews
- Web Browser Grand Prix: Chrome 18, Firefox 11, Windows XP
- The Windows Phone 7.5 Review, A Month-Long Experience
- Web Browser Grand Prix 9: Chrome 17, Firefox 10, And Ubuntu
- Web Browser Grand Prix VIII: Chrome 16, Firefox 9, And Mac OS X
- Tom's Hardware's 2011 Gift Guide: Part 2,...
-
Latest Google News
- Google to Buy Arduino, Raspberry Pi Kits for UK Schools
- Google CEO Larry Page Wears Project Glass to London Event
- Google Officially Owns Motorola Mobility, Names New CEO
- Google Chrome Pushes Past Microsoft's Internet Explorer
- Samsung Unveils GSIII Complete with Own Version of Siri
-
Latest Google reviews
- Tom's Hardware Interviews Four Android And iOS Game...
- Asus Transformer Prime TF201: A Tablet With A Higher Calling
- Web Browser Grand Prix: Chrome 18, Firefox 11, Windows XP
- Web Browser Grand Prix 9: Chrome 17, Firefox 10, And Ubuntu
- Web Browser Grand Prix VIII: Chrome 16, Firefox 9, And Mac OS X
I wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1
Now everyone is going to switch from Chrome to IE?
Nice comparison Adam. I think people don't give MS credit for IE9 because of their history with web standards and lack of competition with updating their browser since they destroyed Netscape so many years ago. Hopefully they have their head in the game and continue with a somewhat constant update cycle. Currently the transition from IE8 to IE9 was somewhat FireFox'ish with speed instead of waiting for another revision of the OS. The browser definitely surprised me, some quirks here and there that are definitely noticeable and the Chrome/FF influence is obviously present. I wish them luck as the competition heats up.
Will there be a " Web Browser Grand Prix 4: Firefox 4 Enters The Race " after Firefox 4's release (22 Mar)?
i felt the speed once i switched from firefox to chrome and now chrome to IE..
but there is no mention of any addon/extentions for IE..
i mean there is no comparision on who's got nice addons and startup time "with" addons.. since users tend to use web browsers with addons knowingly or un-knowingly..
it would be better if you include those two comparisions as well.. and who takes advantage of GPU and all..
Won't take that long for IE to lag behind.
Won't take that long for IE to lag behind.
lol
maybe not!!
and FFS why doesnt that "submit my comment" button not working in IE!! I am using chrome for that ;(
I like how this article was released one day before Firefox 4 is released.
duck it, i stick to firefox.
Is there a wrong picture on the efficiency page? The 40tabs graph comes up as GUIMark 2?
The 40 Tabs chart is wrong for Efficiency Benchmarks: Memory Usage And Management it shows flash vector charting.
I wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1
Then they would have to include every random nightly build of every browser? Comparing the latest release is fair you'll always get one browser or two that is near a new stable version but that's just how it works.
Won't take that long for IE to lag behind.
depends in Microsoft moves up an update schedule that doesn't just include making the browser more secure and fixing bugs. IE8 was pretty snappy back when it was first out it got old in like 3 months compared to other browsers though.
I wonder how much microsoft paid tomshardware not to include Firefox 4 RC1
We only test final products in the WBGP.
Will there be a " Web Browser Grand Prix 4: Firefox 4 Enters The Race " after Firefox 4's release (22 Mar)?
I like how this article was released one day before Firefox 4 is released.
Where are ya'll getting a set date from?
i felt the speed once i switched from firefox to chrome and now chrome to IE..but there is no mention of any addon/extentions for IE.. i mean there is no comparision on who's got nice addons and startup time "with" addons.. since users tend to use web browsers with addons knowingly or un-knowingly..it would be better if you include those two comparisions as well.. and who takes advantage of GPU and all..
We add/modify tests every time with the WBGP. We're already looking into those suggestions.
Is there a wrong picture on the efficiency page? The 40tabs graph comes up as GUIMark 2?
Doh! Fixing that now.
Where are ya'll getting a set date from?
http://groups.google.com/group/moz [...] 9e9650b1b3
Wait a second. Did they really include Safari? Who uses Safari for Windows?
(I'm assuming they tested the Windows version of Safari, because why would you compare browsers for different systems?)
I'm sticking with Opera on my Windows machine and Safari on my Mac.
To be honest I did not read this article, because you're using the "latest and greatest" browsers, but somehow jumped a day early and didn't wait for FF4. Maybe you mentioned it in the article, but if not, then was it really so bad to wait an additional 1-2 days to do this?
... don't know... but this all is not my experience... why there is no firefox 4.0 RC2 ????
Where are ya'll getting a set date from?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/ [...] _22_march/
Although most websites link to this website, so perhaps it was nothing more than a rumor.
Wait a second. Did they really include Safari? Who uses Safari for Windows?
(I'm assuming they tested the Windows version of Safari, because why would you compare browsers for different systems?)
I'm sticking with Opera on my Windows machine and Safari on my Mac.
Opera sucks balls in memory management and lacks handy add-on such as Tab Mix Plus (which is same for Chrome). I would definitely move to Opera if it has these 2 issues fixed.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/4/Beta
This article looks like a case of premature e.. something.
http://groups.google.com/group/moz [...] 9e9650b1b3
On the 16th he said RC1 would become the final code on the 22nd, but they released an RC2 since. I don't believe them anymore. Where is an official announcement or press release? RC1 was supposed to be here in November 2010. WBGP3 was going to feature FF4 at the end of 2010, then again at the end of this Feb. IE9 gave a date, so WBGP3 was made to coincide with its release. IF Firefox 4 launches tomorrow, it's purely coincidental. We stopped holding the WBGP series up for FF4 when MS officially gave their IE9 release date.