Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Which Networking Technology Is Right For Your Home?

Which Networking Technology Is Right For Your Home?
By

When it comes to home networks, one size does not fit all. I had my home built five years ago and spread Gigabit Ethernet-ready CAT5e drops all over the house. I was lucky (or perhaps foolish, considering the present housing market). Most people don’t have this sort of structured wiring in their homes. But most have coax cabling in the walls, and just about everyone who doesn’t live in a tent has power to every room. If all else fails and you’re just not within reach of any plug, there’s WiFi (usually).

I think we can all agree by now that everyone who does more than play Windows Minesweeper needs a network. But which type of network connection is best for you, given issues of cost, availability, bandwidth, and application, remains a big question mark. There is no one-size-fits-all answer. Wi-Fi is fairly cheap and would seem to have omnipresent reach in the home, but anyone who has used WiFi in a space larger than 1,200 to 1,500 square feet knows better. There are plenty of sources for signal disruption, including RF interference from neighbors. Likewise, wired Ethernet is inexpensive and fast, but to implement it beyond a single room, you’re either going to have to spread some cable clutter or incur time and/or cost for stringing wires through your walls.

Netgear should need no introduction among Tom’s Hardware readers. The company has long been a leading name in consumer networking. Some technologies stick around longer than others (Windows Media Center extenders, anyone?), but Netgear has historically been an early adopter in all fields surrounding the home LAN and works hard to build in some of the best features. For instance, I might take jabs at extenders, but Netgear’s latest evolution in the genre, the Digital Entertainer HD, supports H.264 video, HDMI connectivity, optical S/PDIF, and lossless FLAC audio. Extenders are a niche space, but if you’re going to do it, that’s how to do it up right.

Our subject today is infrastructure, especially when it comes to picking a topology suited to entertainment applications. The four primary technologies available today for creating a home network are Ethernet, 802.11 wireless, Powerline, and coaxial. Each of these four has a needed place in today’s market. In order to compare them with the fewest possible variables, we opted to source the latter three of the four from Netgear. Ethernet connectivity generally comes built onto the motherboard these days, at least in consumer circles. There are discrete options, such as Bigfoot’s Killer NIC, but most people will simply save their money for other, more palpable upgrades, and use integrated options.

Which of the four connection technologies is right for you? Let’s find out.

Our Test Environment

We should state right here at the beginning that our goal was to compare these four technologies as mainstream LAN options. We weren’t out to set new land (or air) speed records. Nor did we necessarily want the latest, highest-speed models in any given space. Netgear may not have the fastest product in any given technology, after all. Similarly, the latest dual-band 802.11n routers might eke out better numbers than the 5 GHz kit we evaluated. We wanted gear that was easy, affordable, and effective—the three criteria we think the majority of consumers are after. Given that, we should be able to evaluate performance and get a better sense of which technologies offer better value in different circumstances.

Our test platform began with two notebooks: an HP Compaq nc8000 (1.66 GHz Pentium M, 2GB RAM, Gigabit Ethernet, Windows XP Professional) and a Dell Latitude E6400 (Core 2 Duo P9600, 4GB RAM, Gigabit Ethernet, Windows XP Professional). These were selected more for their portability and because we had them laying around than anything else. Gigabit Ethernet aside, their specs are quite ordinary, which is what we were after.

Next, Netgear was kind enough to drop a small mountain of test gear on our doorstep. We started with the WNR854T RangeMax Next Wireless-N Router Gigabit Edition, a now-mature 2.4 GHz unit with four Gigabit ports, to be the LAN’s central axis. Next came the GS605 5-Port Gigabit Switch. We then busted out a Netgear ReadyNAS Duo, complete with Gigabit Ethernet port, outfitted with a single 500GB drive from which we could stream our transfer test source files.

On this backbone, we then brought in our three competing connections, which we’ll detail momentarily. The whole affair was set up in a standard issue suburban home: 2,600 square feet, two floors, built in 2003, lots of studs and sheet rock, modern power and coax lines in the walls, etc. The only thing missing, as in most homes, was structured wiring for Ethernet connectivity.

We tested in two locations. The router, main system, and NAS were set up in an upstairs bedroom toward the corner of the house. From here, we tested connectivity to the client system on an adjacent desk, about five feet away. For longer-range in-house performance, we then moved the client to the living room downstairs, crossing about 40 feet, one floor, and multiple walls. The specific location of this distance test was governed by the location of the downstairs’ one and only coax drop. Given that Gigabit Ethernet results would be almost identical in-room versus the distance test, and that our main focus was on the three Ethernet alternatives, we opted not to run a 100-foot cable through the house for several days.

Display 44 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 4 Hide
    rebturtle , November 30, 2009 5:47 AM
    I'll be bookmarking this article for customers who tell me, "No, I don't want a wired LAN, I picked up this wireless router at WalMart....."
  • 7 Hide
    blackmancer , November 30, 2009 6:06 AM
    +1 wired ethernet connections all the time!!!!!!!!
  • 1 Hide
    neiroatopelcc , November 30, 2009 6:25 AM
    I like the netgear floorplan "Stairs to go upstairs" ... great!

    And nice article btw. Imo I'd have put the first rant about netgear after the section detailing that you're using it, so it looks more like an explanation than an advertisement (page 1) though.
  • -2 Hide
    anamaniac , November 30, 2009 6:36 AM
    Thank you for the article.
    I decided to skip getting a switch (as I still want interent on all connected devices anyways), and grabbed a 2.4/5GHz 820.11n gigabit router...
    Has done well for me, just too bad my PSP can't use wireless N.

    I've been tempted (and almost did) put new holes in my walls to drag my cat6 cables around my house (I only grabbed cat6 over cat5e because of the colour of the cables at my shop, however I do somewhat regret it because cat5e is a lot more flexible).
  • -2 Hide
    neiroatopelcc , November 30, 2009 7:23 AM
    Q: can regular people like I download the zap benchmark software somewhere? I'm the guy being blamed if our corporate network in two towns breaks down, and lately I've been hammered for unstable wireless network and can't find any cause for this. Would like to see minimum performance for our access points (got about 40 meru aps with dual radio and a,b,g and n concurrently).
  • 2 Hide
    Spanky Deluxe , November 30, 2009 8:07 AM
    Gigabit ethernet throughout the house running through a gigabit switch in the garage here with 802.11g for the laptops until I get round to replacing the router we got with our broadband supplier with an Airport Extreme.

    Luckily the previous owner of the house was a network engineer and had left all the wiring throughout the house. I just hooked up a cheap second hand gigabit switch off eBay and have been loving it ever since.
  • -1 Hide
    NicNash , November 30, 2009 9:12 AM
    If you connect a power-line connector from a computer that is also connected to a wireless n network, to that router... will it use both adapters at same time? or whichever to provide best speed?

    weird thought.. but yea
  • -1 Hide
    NicNash , November 30, 2009 9:13 AM
    btw great article on these lesser known technologies. this article is worth its weight in gold to those who care
  • -1 Hide
    neiroatopelcc , November 30, 2009 9:27 AM
    nicnashIf you connect a power-line connector from a computer that is also connected to a wireless n network, to that router... will it use both adapters at same time? or whichever to provide best speed? weird thought.. but yea

    Depending on the OS, but if you're running a standard microsoft os, it'll use whichever it detects a gateway on first. Has nothing to do with which is fastest or most reliable.

    Type route print in cmd if you want to see what it uses
  • 0 Hide
    ytoledano , November 30, 2009 10:13 AM
    Wired is king.
  • 0 Hide
    Ciuy , November 30, 2009 10:35 AM
    Gigabit Ethernet foreverr, why upgrade/strugle with connection types that perform slower ?? Today we need the best HD connection ever :D 

    wireless is and always will be sheeet !!!!
  • -4 Hide
    Anonymous , November 30, 2009 11:11 AM
    Great post. One small remark though, instead of naming it "Which Networking Technology Is Right For Your Home?" you might've named in "A Netgear commercial", since you talk more about Netgear, than the topic. Dlink and Cisco rule!
  • 0 Hide
    Tattysnuc , November 30, 2009 11:27 AM
    Any chance of a follow up guide on

    1. how to do the setup in software (Mac/Win 7/Vista/XP)
    2. Sharing files
    3. Streaming

    I'm in the process of setting up a Gigabit wired network around the house and I'm struggling to find any decent guides that take you trough the entire process, from selecting the hardware to streaming media.

  • 0 Hide
    neiroatopelcc , November 30, 2009 11:31 AM
    smoleGreat post. One small remark though, instead of naming it "Which Networking Technology Is Right For Your Home?" you might've named in "A Netgear commercial", since you talk more about Netgear, than the topic. Dlink and Cisco rule!

    You put dlink and cisco in the same sentence? imo you should be ashamed!
    If there's one thing I know for certain, then it is that nobody who wants something to work should buy dlink to get there!
    Once (2001) I built a complete infrastructure with dlink switches and wireless adapters. The APs didn't even last a year before I replaced them with some asus ones, and these got replaced by much better HP ones in 2005. And finally when I got a chance to replace the dlink junk with 4108 switches nobody even wanted the old ones! In the end I gave like 20 dlink switches with fiber modules away for free - it was cheaper than throwing them away!

    And over the years when people ask "My wireless connection sometimes doesn't work. When I restart my access point it works again. What can I do about it?" my answer is always "Is it Dlink?" and guess what - the answer has ALWAYS been yes.
    It's possibly the least reliable network gear you can aquire! I'm not particularily fond of netgears mediocre quality, but they're tons better than anything dlink can provide! By the way - buying expensive Dlink stuff doesn't make it more reliable either! I've had a DES-6000 (8 slot modular) break down because it became summer and the temperature reached 34C (have had HP switches enduring 57C without breaking down). And serveral of the DES-1226 although configured correctly with vlans would occasionally send all data to the first vlan until rebooted. You don't reboot network equipment! You just don't!

    As for cisco - it works, sure, but it's tons more expensive than any competing brand, and doesn't offer support for anything nobody else can. And on top of that it's slower than most other quality gear with the same feature sets.

  • -1 Hide
    neiroatopelcc , November 30, 2009 11:35 AM
    TattysnucAny chance of a follow up guide on 1. how to do the setup in software (Mac/Win 7/Vista/XP)2. Sharing files3. StreamingI'm in the process of setting up a Gigabit wired network around the house and I'm struggling to find any decent guides that take you trough the entire process, from selecting the hardware to streaming media.


    And when you're at it do an article about (free) CMS system choices for hosting your web and storage servers at home. We live in a time where anybody can get 50Mbit for the same money a 2Mbit cost 5 years ago.

    Also an article about how ip trafic is routed and how dns servers really work would be cool - cisco is teaching a theory, but it isn't how things actually work in reallife. For instance many isp's provide a link where the 'network number' is the client pc, and the 'broadcast address' is the gateway ; according to cisco this shouldn't work, but it does.
  • 0 Hide
    saint19 , November 30, 2009 11:35 AM
    +1 wired ethernet connection. For my, is the best option till my ISP rise the speed of my connection.
  • -4 Hide
    tommysch , November 30, 2009 11:44 AM
    Going wireless for gaming is like buying a MAC over a PC. Its all hype and the look-at-me-im-so-cool thing.
  • -1 Hide
    fausto , November 30, 2009 12:34 PM
    OK, i've been wanting wired ethernet at home for a while and this just makes me want it even more.

    Anyone knows of any good tutorials on wiring the house? making the holes on the wall and running the wiring?
  • -1 Hide
    fausto , November 30, 2009 12:38 PM
    nicnashIf you connect a power-line connector from a computer that is also connected to a wireless n network, to that router... will it use both adapters at same time? or whichever to provide best speed? weird thought.. but yea


    no it would not, you would have to choose which network connection you want to use between the 2. but it provides a backup if your main one is down.
  • -1 Hide
    ravewulf , November 30, 2009 12:50 PM
    Definitely a combo of Gig-E and Wireless n.

    My laptop already has Wireless n, now I just need a new motherboard* for my desktop with gigabit ethernet and a new router
Display more comments