The Graphics Cards Articles
- 3DNow! Enabled 3D Adapters - Which solution offers the best...
- 3D Chips and Cards
- NVIDIA rocks the Boat with TNT2
- Preview of 3Dfx Voodoo3
- Comparison of Graphics Cards with NVIDIA's RIVA TNT Chip
- Addendum to Rage 128 Review
- First Look at ATI's Rage 128
- NVIDIA vs. 3Dfx - TNT vs. the Voodoos
- Voodoo² Accelerator Review September 1998
- New 3D Chips - Banshee, G200, RIVA TNT And Savage3D
DirectX Performance - Expendable Demo 32 Bit
1:01 PM - June 28, 1999 by
Silvino Orozco
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: review, matrox, g400, max
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: review, matrox, g400, max
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
DirectX Performance - Expendable Demo 32 Bit

This chart is pretty clear cut in showing the G400 MAX in the commanding lead. The G400 MAX takes advantage of the efficient 32 bit color/16bit Z-buffer mode and speeds past the TNT2 (that is held back by the 32 bit color/32 bit Z-buffer mode).

Here we see the G400 MAX retain its marginal lead over the TNT2.

Interestingly enough, the performance of the G400 MAX drops drastically as the CPU performance decreases. Pairing the G400 MAX with a speedy processor is a must if you expect top-notch performance from the card.

As we expected, the G400 MAX drops it's position due to the slower performing CPU.

The G400 MAX is still doing fairly well even with the slowest processor in 32 bit color. At this point the CPU seems to be hindering both cards.
- Previous page DirectX Performance - Expendable Demo...
- Next page GL Performance