Asus revised the liquid metal application on its $4,000 ROG Matrix RTX 5090 cards — der8auer says retail versions come with 'much more professional' spread
Compared to the sample he checked out earlier.
Last month, reports of Asus' hyper-expensive ROG Matrix RTX 5090s being recalled started popping up, with the company saying that "product optimizations and enhancements" were in order. At the time, the leading theory pointed toward subpar liquid metal application on the GPU core, as called out by Roman 'der8bauer' Hartung, which has now been confirmed in his latest video. He takes the card apart to find a different spread that should hold up much better over time.
The sample variant of this GPU had the liquid metal applied, rather poorly, in an uneven ring shape. It performed fine thermally but appeared as a manual hack job rather than something coming off a production line. These ROG Matrix cards are Asus' flagship offering for enthusiasts, so perhaps a handmade touch might actually seem more luxurious, but not in this case.
Liquid metal is a competent thermal interface material, but if it leaks from the application area, it can short out the surrounding components, causing havoc in an instant. Therefore, cautionary measures need to be put in place to prevent that from happening. On these recalled cards, Asus did that by adding a new thermal paste pattern around the perimeter of the core.
As you can see above, the liquid metal now essentially hugs the thermal paste on the substrate, with two more lanes of it blocking the metal from ever coming out. There are cutouts in the application to ensure breathability and facilitate thermal expansion when the GPU is actually running. Apart from the thermal paste application, the liquid metal itself behaves a bit differently on this card, too.
Der8auer put the compound in an SEM for material analysis to find silicon oil mixed with the metal, likely to make mass application easier. The findings aren't conclusive, but Asus seems to have used some printing technique to form liquid metal droplets, which were then mixed with silicon, so factories could have an easier time consistently replicating the TIM spread.
Apart from these under-the-hood cooling changes, the rest of the card is identical to its sample version, which is to say: very over the top. The GPU pulled almost 800W in FurMark with the fans spinning slightly slower than before. The temps remained lower, too, but that could have to do with the card's orientation on the test bench.
The video includes a lot of other interesting tidbits, such as a tease for a wired version of the WireView Pro, allowing the tool to be usable with any graphics card. Asus also shipped a few BTF (back connect) to 12V-2x6 adapters to der8auer, which he used for testing this card. The modder also appreciated the fact that these GPUs were recalled to fix a complaint; a costly effort, but one that's probably expected when $4,000 is on the line.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
Gururu I saw this video this morning. Der8auer is always great. I am always under the impression that companies use the worst pastes and the least care in spreading on chips. This is a good example I wonder if Asus is applying with this type of care among all its cards.Reply -
CelicaGT Silicone oil mixed with gallium, so it's the same as Dells "Element 31" but without the marketing mumbo jumbo.Reply -
Notton Liquid metal leaking out wasn't the top story of 2020~2025, but it must have happened often enough that the decision was made to improve things.Reply
ixr1QaP7chM
The seal looks like it will work for standard horizontal and landscape vertical GPU placement, but what about portrait vertical?
The open ring around the GPU looks like it could still leak if the GPU is placed in portrait orientation.