Page 1:Overclocking And Efficiency Go Hand-In-Hand
Page 2:Intel Core i7-2600K For Mainstream Overclockers
Page 3:Turbo Boost 2.0 And The PCU Manage Overclocking
Page 4:Overclocking Settings
Page 5:Test Setup And Benchmark Settings
Page 6:Benchmark Results: Audio/Video
Page 7:Benchmark Results: Office/Graphics/Rendering
Page 8:Benchmark Results: Archiving
Page 9:Idle/Peak Power Consumption
Page 10:Efficiency Using One Core
Page 11:Efficiency Using Multiple Threads
Page 12:Combined Single/Multi-Thread Efficiency
Page 13:Overall Overclocked Power Efficiency
Page 14:Conclusion: Overclocking Becomes Efficient
We decided to gradually increase the default multiplier, starting with the 34x default, but stay with the default Turbo Boost ratios, as described on the previous page. This means that our Core i7-2600K processor accelerates by four 100 MHz speed bins as long as the power limit allows. So, we went all the way from 34+4 to 46+4.
We also moved the power limits up to 300 W for our overclocking project, because we wanted to check out the limits based on Intel’s boxed cooler. The unit that comes with the K-series processors can be considered at least solid and, will probably be used by most users buying a K-series processor.
However, our extreme power limit paired with this cooler certainly doesn’t protect our system from crashing at high clock speeds. This is because the cooler inevitably hits its thermal limits and because the power unit won’t govern clock speeds at our effectively unlimited power limit. The cooler bundled with the K-series processor is adequate for reasonable overclocking. Hardcore users might want to shop for a more powerful device, though.
These are the voltages we selected for our overclocking project:
|Clock Speed||CPU-Z Voltage||BIOS Voltage|
|3.5 GHz 4-Core; 3.8 GHz 1-Core||1.176 V||1.224 V||1.25 V|
|3.7 GHz 4-Core; 4.0 GHz 1-Core||1.236 V||1.224 V||1.305 V|
|3.9 GHz 4-Core; 4.2 GHz 1-Core||1.26 V||1.224 V||1.345 V|
|4.0 GHz 4-Core; 4.3 GHz 1-Core||1.26 V||1.224 V||1.35 V|
|4.1 GHz 4-Core; 4.4 GHz 1-Core||1.272 V||1.224 V||1.35 V|
|4.2 GHz 4-Core; 4.5 GHz 1-Core||1.272 V||1.224 V||1.35 V|
|4.3 GHz 4-Core; 4.6 GHz 1-Core||1.284 V||1.224 V||1.355 V|
|4.4 GHz 4-Core; 4.7 GHz 1-Core||1.272 V||1.224 V||1.365 V*|
|4.5 GHz 4-Core; 4.8 GHz 1-Core||1.32 V||1.272 V||1.365 V*|
|4.6 GHz 4-Core; 4.9 GHz 1-Core||1.332 V||1.284 V||1.37 V*|
We used Gigabyte’s P67A-UD5 motherboard for our overclocking testing and left the voltage settings on Auto mode for almost all clock speeds except 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6 GHz (*).
This was the fastest reliable setting on our Core i7-2600K sample. Multiplier 45x with up to four speed bins in Turbo Boost mode for a single core. The voltage reading isn’t accurate, though.
All Sandy Bridge processors currently switch to 16x (1600 MHz) when idle.
One final note: the Core i7-2600K processor always managed to maintain one multiplier above the configured default setting, which means that you will only see a difference of three (instead of four) speed bins in all benchmark charts.
- Overclocking And Efficiency Go Hand-In-Hand
- Intel Core i7-2600K For Mainstream Overclockers
- Turbo Boost 2.0 And The PCU Manage Overclocking
- Overclocking Settings
- Test Setup And Benchmark Settings
- Benchmark Results: Audio/Video
- Benchmark Results: Office/Graphics/Rendering
- Benchmark Results: Archiving
- Idle/Peak Power Consumption
- Efficiency Using One Core
- Efficiency Using Multiple Threads
- Combined Single/Multi-Thread Efficiency
- Overall Overclocked Power Efficiency
- Conclusion: Overclocking Becomes Efficient