AMD Unveils Zen Microarchitecture, Demos Summit Ridge Performance

AMD hosted an offsite invitation-only briefing during IDF to unveil the company's new Zen processor core microarchitecture, which will initially come to market in its Summit Ridge desktop CPUs. The company outlined some of the challenges associated with designing its new microarchitecture, which it claims is essentially a clean-sheet approach to processor design. AMD provided new architectural details and also demonstrated performance in a few benchmarks, including a head-to-head render test against an Intel Broadwell-E Core i7-6900K, albeit an underclocked one. AMD also had several Zen-powered demo stations available for the press to use after the event, and it also displayed its new 32 core/64 thread Naples server CPUs. AMD CEO Dr. Lisa Lu took to the stage and explained that the company plans to employ the Zen core into key market segments, such as desktops, servers, notebooks and embedded platforms. She also touted many of the company's recent successes, such as the recent Polaris, 7th-Gen Bristol Ridge and Stony Ridge APU launches, along with the company's lucrative design wins in Microsoft and Sony consoles.

The Goals

But it was really time to turn the attention to the Zen microarchitecture. AMD's original goal was to increase Zen's IPC (Instructions Per Cycle) performance by 40 percent compared to the previous-generation Excavator core. According to the company, it achieved its goals. AMD also noted that the company focused on providing power efficiency gains in tandem with the performance improvements, which is the key attribute that will allow the Zen cores to scale to address a broad swath of market segments. The Summit Ridge processors on display featured 8 cores and 16 threads. For now, AMD has the early silicon (including the CPUs used in the demos) clocked at 3 GHz, but the company will increase the clock and announce more detailed specifications as Zen moves closer to launch.

Zen uses the same 14nm GlobalFoundries FinFET process that it employs on its Polaris GPUs. The process provides a nice improvement over the 28nm process used with the Excavator and Steamroller microarchitectures. Zen CPUs will drop into the AM4 chipset that debuted with the Bristol and Stony Ridge products. The AM4 chipset supports DDR4, PCIe 3.0, Next-Gen I/O, USB 3.1 Gen 2, NVMe and SATA Express. 

Diving In

AMD added SMT (Simultaneous Multi-Threading), a new cache hierarchy and increased branch prediction capabilities to the Zen core to attain its ambitious IPC goals.

The company added a micro-op cache, which helps with better instruction predictions, to increase ILP (Instruction Level Parallelism). AMD also added a wider execution width and improved instruction scheduling to boost ILP (and thus IPC). The company claims the optimizations provide 75 percent more scheduling capacity and a 50 percent increase in instruction width over its previous-generation processors.

AMD also redesigned the cache subsystem to increase throughput. Zen includes an enhanced prefetcher, 8MB of shared L3 cache, a unified L2 cache and separate L1 instruction (64K 4-way) and data (32K 8-way) caches. AMD noted that the cache subsystem provides up to a 5X increase in cache capacity and bandwidth. Pairing the cache subsystem with SMT increases parallelism and boosts multi-threaded applications. As expected, Zen exposes the extra thread to the host as an additional core.

The company noted that the addition of the 14nm FinFET process, along with clock gating, a large Micro-op cache and the stack engine (among other improvements), provide a 40 percent IPC boost within the same energy-per-cycle envelope as its previous-generation Excavator core.

Taking On Broadwell-E

Surprisingly, AMD chose to demonstrate a head-to-head test of Summit Ridge against the Intel Broadwell-E Core i7-6900K, which also sports 8 cores and 16 threads. The early Zen silicon is only clocked at 3 GHz, so AMD downclocked the 6900K (3.2 GHz base and 3.7 GHz turbo) to 3 GHz to normalize the test. We aren't privy to the final Summit Ridge clock speeds, but the company indicated that some SKUs would ship with higher clock speeds when it comes to market. We advise readers to take the test with a grain of salt. AMD did not share test bed details, such as the amount of system RAM, but indicated that the systems had comparable configurations.

The test consisted of a CPU-intensive multi-threaded Blender 3D rendering that scaled across all of the cores. The Summit Ridge CPU rendered the image ever so slightly faster than the Intel 6900K. The contest was close enough that, without a stopwatch, we couldn't give an accurate measurement of the speed difference, and AMD did not provide specific measurements for the test.

Demo Systems

AMD provided a number of Summit Ridge demo systems for the press to use after the official announcements, including a VR desktop system outfitted with an AMD Radeon RX 480, a gaming desktop setup and a workstation demo with a Radeon Pro Duo.

The systems functioned well, but the restricted nature of the demo systems didn't provide any meaningful insight into overall performance. The Summit Ridge systems were also inside of normal desktop cases, which obstructed our pictures and didn't allow for a closer internal examination. 

Naples Server

AMD briefly introduced its server-centric 32-core/64-thread Zen-based Naples SoCs, but the company did not provide any details on the new platform.

A development motherboard outfitted with two processors was on display, which allowed for closer examination, and the demo included a functional server system running Windows Server. The server was not running a workload, but it served as proof that the Naples processors are up and running (at least to some extent). 

Zen Is Alive And Kicking

The AMD live demos and systems indicate that the company is moving closer to shipping end products. The details of the architecture are interesting, but there are still more questions than answers. AMD indicated that it would share more architectural details during a session next week at the HotChips conference, so we expect to have more information soon. AMD did not disclose TDP details but stated that Zen would be competitive with Intel's CPUs.

AMD also mentioned in passing that it is already developing the follow-on Zen+ architecture but did not provide further details.

The challenge for AMD is to bring a competitive Summit Ridge to market, and Su stated that desktop products are already shipping to its partners, and the company expects wide availability in Q1 2017. The Naples platform will follow in 2Q 2017, and Zen-based APUs will make their debut in the second half of 2017. The company also expects to deliver both CPUs and APUs for the embedded market next year but did not provide a concrete timeframe.

The final Summit Ridge clock speeds, price and overclockability will be the key ingredients that determine its success or failure. AMD seems genuinely excited and optimistic that the Zen core will revitalize its entire CPU and APU portfolio, but until we have products to test, the future remains somewhat blurry.

Create a new thread in the US News comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
144 comments
Comment from the forums
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • JamesSneed
    913355 said:
    Under-clocking the Intel chip to boost stats on "comparable" systems and Zen was not even noticeably faster? That's sad.


    Its not sad. It was to show IPC and performance of Zen vs Broadwell. Which if the demo is to be trusted its about the same as Broadwell. This is also early silicon so they probably haven't ramped up the clocks yet as they fine tune the chips I'm sure you will see higher clocks than 3Ghz. I hope it is on par with Intel's Broadwell architecture that would be some nice competition since Intel hasn't improved IPC much since Broadwell.
  • RedJaron
    1861575 said:
    I sort of agree with him though. They're saying a 40% increase over Excavator, which has been around for 5 years. Intel doing 10% a year for 5 years is 50%, so until actual reviews and benchmarks come out - at least from a numbers standpoint - they're no closer to Intel than they were 5 years ago.
    Wrong. Excavator is not five years old. You're confusing that with Bulldozer. The first desktop Excavator chip was the Athlon 845, released earlier this year. You're forgetting the improvements that came with Piledriver and Steamroller.

    Your math is all kinds of screwed up. First, you're making a fence-post error; you're counting an extra data point after the end of the set. Actually, you're doing it twice since you're counting from before your set as well ( Sandy Bridge should be your base 0, not the first 10% increase in your methodology ). You actually only have three increases thus far in the last five years: Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge, IB to Haswell, HW to Skylake. Kaby Lake hasn't launched yet. It might be fair to compare Zen to KL since they'll hopefully launch around the same time, but we don't have any KL numbers yet.

    Second, Intel hasn't been increasing 10% in each generation. It's actually between to 5% - 8%. So even assuming the higher 8% figure, SL is about 26% faster than SB, or half of your assumed 50%. Even using the 10% figure, it's only 33%. Conversely, Zen's IPC is 40% better than EX, which was ~5% better SR, which was ~6% better than PD, which was ~6% better than BD. Which means they're claiming Zen's IPC is 66% higher than BD's


    913355 said:
    Under-clocking the Intel chip to boost stats on "comparable" systems and Zen was not even noticeably faster? That's sad.

    34444 said:
    i stopped reading at the part where they had to underclock an intel I7 to match the speed of the test chip. top notch marketing as always by AMD
    You both should have actually read the article and details before jumping on the comments to rant. The i7 was underclocked to from 3.2 GHz to 3.0 GHz so that it was running at the same speed as the demo Zen CPU. That way you get a true clock-for-clock comparison. If this demo is to be believed, Zen has similar IPC to Broadwell-E. That's a huge jump over their previous architectures.
  • xenol
    @Neoku
    So is 10% increments Intel's been doing over the past five generations.
  • Other Comments
  • Nolonar
    Looking good so far.
    Unfortunately, I'm way too biased towards Intel to consider buying an AMD CPU any time in the near future, but I really hope Zen does well. Competition is good, and Intel definitely needs that competition.
  • ComputerSecurityGuy
    So 6 core Broadwell is roughly on par with Zen. Not bad, AMD. That's decently competitive. What I really want to se is perf per watt figures though.
  • Neoku
    40% over Excavator is disappointing.