Intel Reveals Three new Cutting-Edge Packaging Technologies

(Image credit: @david_schor WikiChip)
  • vaughn2k
    This is not cutting edge. This assembly (not packaging please!!) technology has been existing for 10 years, and already being used by Philips, NXP, as well as STMicro and Toshiba. Its just Intel made it larger, and better reliable because of the size, and regardless of its assembly technology name.
    This is not new anymore.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    1000+ micro-bumps per square millimeter? Yikes, those are going to be some awfully small solder joints. Some serious material science must be going in there to prevent those from breaking under thermal expansion/contraction cycles.
    Reply
  • redgarl
    Another bunch of slide and another bunch of prototypes that nobody has a clue if they work. Another attempt at manipulating the message and saying "Hey, we are here and we have more chiplets!!!"

    While at the same time... Sunnycove exist... just saying...
    Reply
  • AllanGH
    Another "new" technology from Intel >gasp< and on the heels of the Zen 2 release!

    My heart is all a-flutter!

    Well, not really, but it looks like Intel is feeling ignored, so I'll play along.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    redgarl said:
    Another bunch of slide and another bunch of prototypes that nobody has a clue if they work. Another attempt at manipulating the message and saying "Hey, we are here and we have more chiplets!!!"

    While at the same time... Sunnycove exist... just saying...

    Don't think its all a prototype. They are already shipping some products using this and this will probably be in their next server CPU. Its similar, although more advanced, to AMDs chiplet design. If AMD can do it wouldn't you think a company that can spend more than AMD earns in a few years on FABs could figure it out too?

    AllanGH said:
    Another "new" technology from Intel >gasp< and on the heels of the Zen 2 release!

    My heart is all a-flutter!

    Well, not really, but it looks like Intel is feeling ignored, so I'll play along.

    You are right. Intel should just stop trying new ideas and never report about them at all ever.

    Or they should continue to try new ideas and give nice new ground breaking ones that benefit everyone eventually much like Thunderbolt which will be integrated into USB 4.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    jimmysmitty said:
    If AMD can do it wouldn't you think a company that can spend more than AMD earns in a few years on FABs could figure it out too?
    Intel is actually many years ahead of AMD on chiplets if you count Intel's experience making FPGAs for Altera prior to buying the company.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    InvalidError said:
    Intel is actually many years ahead of AMD on chiplets if you count Intel's experience making FPGAs for Altera prior to buying the company.

    I was trying to remember the company they bought and the name of the product they have shipping with these technologies. Agilex. It uses the EMIB and Forevos designs.
    Reply
  • maddogfargo
    Congrats Intel, you finally caught up with AMD's innovation from the R9 FURY. No doubt Raja's influence there...
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    maddogfargo said:
    Congrats Intel, you finally caught up with AMD's innovation from the R9 FURY. No doubt Raja's influence there...
    Nope, Intel has been making "3D" chips for Altera's Stratix 10 FPGA family since 2013, two years before the Fury.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    InvalidError said:
    Nope, Intel has been making "3D" chips for Altera's Stratix 10 FPGA family since 2013, two years before the Fury.

    More like since 2007 if you count their Terascale processor design which had a CPU stacked on top of memory:

    https://www.tgdaily.com/33657-background-inside-intels-tera-scale-project/
    They even hit 1TB/s worth of bandwidth back then too.
    Reply