SK Hynix's New SSD Boasts 1.4 Million IOPS

SK hynix Platinum P41 M.2 SSD
(Image credit: Amazon)

SK hynix has released a brand new PCIe Gen 4 SSD known as the Platinum P41, featuring capacities of up to 2TB and sequential speeds of up to 7000MB. However, its most prominent selling point is that it's rated for 1.4 million random read IOPS and 1.3 million random write IOPS, which would make it one of the fastest SSDs on the market.

For some perspective, the best SSDs right now usually top out at around 1 million IOPs for random reads. The WD Black SN850 (2TB) achieved just over 1 million on our tests (at 4K QD 256 Q16T16) while the Kingston KC3000 (TB) hit 1.57 million IOPS in random writes (4K QD 256 Q16T16). So, if the Platinum P41 lives up to its claims, it would have a really strong combination of random read and write IOPS though not necessarily the fastest writes.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    For reference, the Samsung 980 Pro 2TB is $269.99 at Amazon. It will be interesting to see how this drive stacks up against it in reviews.

    I say this as someone who is in the market to replace 2 smaller Samsung 960 Pros with a single 2TB 980 Pro.
    Reply
  • drajitsh
    Why are current generation SSDs so low on endurance vs the last gen. For example 750 TBW Vs 1400 or more in msi spatium 470
    Reply
  • edzieba
    Exiting for datacentres running high concurrent usage DBs (who would likely not be seen dead running one of these drives and are instead lapping up every Optane die they can get), but what does its IOPS performance look like at the QD1 queue depths seen with desktop workloads?
    Reply
  • jp7189
    drajitsh said:
    Why are current generation SSDs so low on endurance vs the last gen. For example 750 TBW Vs 1400 or more in msi spatium 470
    The more bits stored per cell the higher chance of error. The intrinsic problem moving from TLC to QLC is actually worse than the numbers suggest, but is improved by better error correction techniques.
    Reply
  • drajitsh
    jp7189 said:
    The more bits stored per cell the higher chance of error. The intrinsic problem moving from TLC to QLC is actually worse than the numbers suggest, but is improved by better error correction techniques.
    Both drives are TLC. I am currently not interested in QLC drives. I would only consider a QLC drive if it is 10c/GB or less for a drive with DRAM.
    Reply