Storage
With access times a little lower and average read speeds a little faster, AMD would indeed seem to have made some improvements to the SB750’s storage performance.
AMD 790GX: RV610 For Enthusiasts?
71 Comments
Comment from the forums
-
kitsilencer 06 August 2008 11:47 Great review, and it's good to see that AMD is at last able to target more enthusiast markets competitively.Reply -
cangelini 06 August 2008 12:38 kitsilencerGreat review, and it's good to see that AMD is at last able to target more enthusiast markets competitively.Reply
Thanks for the feedback Kit. -
eklipz330 06 August 2008 13:19 ^^^iseriously thought that was sarcasm, until i saw the authors nameReply -
waffle911 06 August 2008 14:01 So... why does a page 15 and 16 of this article exist if there is no page 15 or 16 to the article?Reply
Take a closer look. What happened? -
YYD 06 August 2008 14:15 PCMark seems Intel biased, please read this:Reply
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/atom-nano-review.ars/6
Please change this benchmark suite or check if PcMark Vantage is unbiased. -
cangelini 06 August 2008 14:23 waffle911So... why does a page 15 and 16 of this article exist if there is no page 15 or 16 to the article?Take a closer look. What happened?Reply
That was strange. Should be fixed now.
-
cangelini 06 August 2008 14:24 YYDPCMark seems Intel biased, please read this:http://arstechnica.com/reviews/har view.ars/6Please change this benchmark suite or check if PcMark Vantage is unbiased.Reply
Fortunately, with no Intel platforms tested, this should be a non-issue for the current situation ;-) In the future, you'll be seeing SYSmark, though. -
06 August 2008 14:30 Seems past page 8 or something the links are corrupt.. can't fully read this article and getting error 404 - page not found.Reply -
cangelini 06 August 2008 14:51 lacrits.. and now the article seems to be removed even from the main page!?!?!Reply
Alright, mystery solved. It's back up, sans the blank page. Thanks for pointing that out lacrits!