Trending

System Builder Marathon, Q3 2013: $650 Gaming PC

By

CPU And Cooler

Processor: AMD FX-6300

The AMD FX-6300 sports a trio of Piledriver-based modules, which in turn pack two integer cores each. This 95 W CPU is outfitted with 8 MB of shared L3 cache and a 3.5 GHz base frequency, which, out of the box can reach up to 4.1 GHz with Turbo Core enabled. It also enjoys the flexibility of an unlocked CPU multiplier.

Read Customer Reviews of AMD's FX-6300

CPU Cooler: AMD Retail Boxed Heatsink & Fan

Although we were thrilled to get an extra Piledriver module activated at no cost compared to an FX-4300, we're still disappointed in the cooler that AMD bundles with the -6300. It consists simply of a small, all-aluminum block and a 70 mm fan. In contrast, the company's 125 W chips (like the FX-6350, -8320, and -8350) at least include a more formidable heat sink packing a copper slug and heat pipes. This is something we simply must factor into the overall value. When you're forced to dump an extra $20 or $40 bucks into aftermarket cooling, you could have stepped up to a higher-end CPU instead. And if you truly value a quiet PC, you really have to go the aftermarket cooler route.

For this build, we had other plans for our money. Additionally, we wanted to test the boxed cooler and see what FX-6300 could do in its most affordable form.

131 Comments Comment from the forums
  • Darkerson 23 September 2013 04:22
    Not a bad little entry system. Im sure it will get picked apart here in the comments soon, but for the price, its not that bad at all.
    Reply
  • iam2thecrowe 23 September 2013 04:48
    I think this time you chose the perfect balance of cpu and gpu at this price point. The Athlon 750k is far too weak, please don't use it next month, even an fx41xx or 43xx would be a better choice. The Haswell i3 would be interesting as we might be able to get some overclocking wby increasing base clock strap settings
    Reply
  • Onus 23 September 2013 04:57
    It looked great until I saw the mobo, then I thought "oops..."
    Based on http://www.overclock.net/a/about-vrms-mosfets-motherboard-safety-with-high-tdp-processors and https://spreadsheets.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0AgN1D79Joo7tdE9xMUFlMEVWeFhuckJEVF9aMmtpUFE&gid=0 I would have gone with http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813138372 instead; it has a heatsink on its VRMs, and it currently offers free shipping and is $2 less (it's been that way for a while now; I've had my eye on it for recommendations). I'm concerned that the cheap MSI will pop in the middle of a long gaming session. Did you by chance point an IR thermometer at its VRMs during your testing?
    Otherwise, it's nice to see the FX-6300 get a workout in which it performs in the same ballpark as its competition, maybe a little less "raw," but with higher bang/buck.
    Reply
  • noob2222 23 September 2013 05:57
    its crazy how fast memory prices change, that kingston kit is now $84 and the team vulcan 2133 and 2400 are <60.
    Reply
  • designasaurus 23 September 2013 06:05
    I'd be interested in seeing an FX 8-core more than the FM2 Athlons. In general though, it would be nice to see an AMD processor in these quarterly builds more regularly. I know you guys treat it as a competition, but, for readers like me, it's more informative to see how the competition shapes up rather than seeing 5% boosts from the latest Ivy-to-Haswell iteration. The higher budget guys are pretty much exclusively using Intel these days (I'll get my Haswell comparisons there), so your lower budget builds are the only place to reasonably see how a good AMD build stacks up. FX-6300 is definitely the best value AMD processor though, so it's going to be tough for you to beat this if you go up or down in cpu budget to get the Athlon or octocore.
    Reply
  • Novuake 23 September 2013 06:07
    Yeah, I would not touch that board...
    Reply
  • m32 23 September 2013 06:56
    I would have to put an fan over the VRMs to feel safe. That is just me. designasaurus, nice read and I agree.
    Reply
  • ingtar33 23 September 2013 07:05
    nice build. though i probably would have went with a 7950, and took the $50 saved to get a cpu cooler like the hyper evo 212, and a better overclocking motherboard like the m5a97 R2.0... you probably would have been able to give that fx a bit better of a chance to hit mid to high 4s on the overclock then. if you can get a 6300 up around 4.7-4.9 (obviously not all of them can get there) you can pace an i5 pretty easily... so spending a little on the board and cpu cooler is a good option.

    the 8 core 8320 is getting pretty cheap. the problem is in order to unleash that type of power you're probably going to NEED to go with a hefty cpu cooler and hefty overclocking board. so for the future i suggest you keep with the fx 6300 unless the prices on the 8320 come down a little more.
    Reply
  • Lee Yong Quan 23 September 2013 07:14
    would love to see how well does the $350 pc compare with the Q2 $400 PC! then i would know how well my pc would perform when gta 5 is out!
    Reply
  • bemused_fred 23 September 2013 08:21
    Why is everyone saying "go with the HD 7950" when they clearly said in the article that it only became cheaper after they finished the build?
    "AMD's Radeon HD 7950 now sells for even less. But at the time we picked our parts, the GeForce GTX 760 was more affordable."

    Honestly, read the article before commenting!
    Reply