PCI Express & CrossFire: Scaling Explored

Test Settings

Swipe to scroll horizontally
ComponentBase Settings
CPUIntel Core 2 Duo E8600, (3.33GHz, 6.0 MB Cache)Overclocked to 4.00 GHz, FSB-1600
Memory2 x 2.0 GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-6400Set to 800MHz data rate, CAS 4-4-4-10
Graphics2 x Gigabyte GV-R487-512H-BHD 4870 GPU (750 MHz), GDDR5-3600
Hard DriveWestern Digital WD5000AAKS, 500 GB7,200 RPM, SATA 3 Gb/s, 16 MB cache
SoundIntegrated HD Audio
NetworkIntegrated Gigabit Networking
PowerCooler Master RS850-EMBA (850W, ATX12V v2.2)
Software and DriversRow 7 - Cell 1
Operating SystemWindows Vista Ultimate SP1
Graphics DriverAMD Catalyst 8.9
Onboard Device DriversMotherboard Driver DVD

While many of our test games show enormous performance gains from higher clock speed, none have shown significant improvements in the transition from two to four cores. Thus, we used a dual-core processor that usually overclocks beyond 4 GHz on air cooling. Intel’s Core 2 Duo E8600 is probably the best gaming processor owners of LGA775 motherboards can hope for their motherboards to support because it starts out as Intel’s highest-frequency model and is easily pushed beyond the speeds other processors can reliably run.

Overclocked to 4.0 GHz at FSB-1600, our Core 2 Duo E8600 required good RAM to achieve optimal throughput. Unfortunately, the oldest chipset in today’s line-up wasn’t designed to support DDR2-1066, and using the DDR2-1000 setting resulted in severe instability. Without the ability to increase memory speed, we instead settled for tight CAS 4 latencies at DDR2-800 and 2.00 volts. Crucial’s Ballistix DDR2-800 4.0 GB dual-channel kit worked perfectly.

With the support hardware in place, it was time to pick graphics cards. Though the targeted upgrade market of this piece will likely favor lower-cost HD 4850 or HD 4830 based graphics models, the HD 4870 allows us to test the limit of motherboard differences when using the same architecture as those two high-value solutions. A pair of Gigabyte’s GV-R487-512H-B graphics cards suited our testing needs well.

To further examine graphics performance differences, we added Race Driver GRID to our regular selection of benchmarks.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
CrysisVersion: 1.2.1Test 1: Low Details, No AATest 2: Very High Details, 8x AADemo: CPU-Benchmark + Tom’s Hardware Tool
Race Driver:GRIDVersion: 1.20.0000Test 1: Low Details, No AATest 2: Very High Details, 8x AATrack: Jarama
Supreme CommanderForged AllianceVersion: 1.5.3599Test 1: Low Details, No AATest 2: Very High Details, 8x AADemo: WallaceTX_006_006Benchmark: Fraps 2.9.4 - Build 7037
Unreal Tournament 3Version: 1.2Sound and DirectX10Texture Details: 1Level Details: 1Demo: vCTF-Reflection_flyTime: 12/60
World in ConflictVersion: 1.0.0.9Test 1: Very Low details (No AA, No AF)Test 2: Very High details (4x AA, 4x AF)Demo: Game-Benchmark
Swipe to scroll horizontally
3DMark VantageVersion: 1.02GPU and CPU scores
SiSoftware Sandra XII SP2Version 2008.5.14.24CPU Test = CPU Arithmetic / MultimediaMemory Test = Bandwidth Benchmark

Because different generations of chipset support different bus speeds, we also included Sandra’s CPU and memory bandwidth benchmarks to gauge the effects chipset overclocking had on performance.

Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
  • badge
    Thanks for laying that information out.
    Reply
  • sparky2010
    should've included 1920x resolutions in the last page, as there are a lot of people out there with screens capable of that resolution.. but anyways, all in all a very good and informative article.. but i'm going to settle with a complete makeover when core i7 becomes more available!
    Reply
  • V3NOM
    yer kinda interesting to see how things have changed with new mobos but it doesnt really have any practical value tbh.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    V3NOMyer kinda interesting to see how things have changed with new mobos but it doesnt really have any practical value tbh.
    It's all about answering the question "Will a second card do the job".

    Lots of guys have midrange or better ATI graphics cards, and the question of "upgrade or replace" is constantly being asked.
    Reply
  • outlw6669
    Thanks for finally getting this review out!
    Reply
  • arkadi
    p45 looks grate, and the price is right.
    Reply
  • arkadi
    btw x58 is out there, just a reminder.
    Reply
  • outlw6669
    @ arkadi
    Yes the x58 is out.
    However, as it can not be paired with a Core 2 CPU and runs DDR3 exclusively, you can not directly compare the results.
    In general, I would assume crossfire on the x58 will scale similarly to the x38/48 as they both have the same PCIe configuration.
    Reply
  • Crashman
    outlw6669Thanks for finally getting this review out!
    It was planned for September but kept getting delayed due to tight deadlines on other articles. But when the economy finally went from a slow decline to a nosedive in November, we knew this article had to come out right away. More people are putting new systems on hold and looking for ways to keep their old ones up to current performance standards, and we care about upgraders just as much as system builders.
    Reply
  • arkadi
    Yeah I know, the comment was in general...
    Reply