PCI Express And SLI Scaling: How Many Lanes Do You Need?

By Thomas Soderstrom
published

Are the most elaborate platforms really required to host the fastest GPUs, or can you get away with P55's lane-splitting scheme? As Nvidia’s latest graphics processors push 3D performance to new heights, we examine the interfaces needed to support them.

SLI Scaling: S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call Of Pripyat

Everyone who has followed today’s scaling article to this point should be completely aware of the pattern that has emerged. Testing the GeForce GTX 480 in SLI has not yet made sense at medium resolutions, because the 4.00 GHz Core i7 CPU hasn’t been able to keep up with the cards at anything less than 2560x1600. S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat is proving to be an exception, only because the cards can’t keep up with the game at that resolution.

We still see the performance gain for SLI shoot up from 75% at 1680x1050 to 94% at 2560x1600, yet because the game isn’t completely playable at our highest test settings (with a 16 FPS minimum frame rate not shown), most users will be forced to sacrifice resolution, details, or anti-aliasing to regain a more fluid experience.

Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom
Thomas Soderstrom is a Senior Staff Editor at Tom's Hardware US. He tests and reviews cases, cooling, memory and motherboards.
80 Comments Comment from the forums
  • Mousemonkey
    There are quite a few folk who have been waiting for this.
    Reply
  • zorky9
    This would even add more value to the i5-750 in your best CPU for the money article.
    Reply
  • amk09
    I love how people always bash on x8 x8 and how it sucks, when in reality x16 x16 is only 4% better.

    You spend unnecessary $$$ on a x58 platform while I save money that I can put towards a GPU upgrade with my p55 platform :)
    Reply
  • carlhenry
    i'm curious how other games are "dependent" on bandwidth while others are not... does that mean that the games that aren't dependent on bandwidth isn't using the full potential given the the size advantage of x16 over the x8? i wish every game would utilize every inch of your hardware in the future.
    Reply
  • sambadagio
    For all your fps hunters, I bet you only have a screen at home with 50 or 60Hz. So just for your information, everything above 50 or 60fps is just useless... In this aspect, a PCIx 4x is actually enough... ;-)

    Reply
  • luke904
    so a 4850 crossfire setup will hardly be bottlenecked by an 8 lane motherboard.

    anyone know if 4850's are going to be unavailable any time soon? You could get the 3000 series for quite awhile after the 4000's released so I'm crossing my fingers until i can afford a cpu upgrade and another 4850

    cpu is currently a 7750BE and so im pretty sure it would bottleneck the 4850's. I think it does with just one actually.
    Reply
  • jgv115
    @ carlhenry

    It's not the game's fault. The GPU can only go as fast as it was made to go. So in simple terms you could say that GPUs these days aren't "fast" enough to use all the bandwidth PCI Express offers.
    Reply
  • outlw6669
    Very nice review but I have to ask, why did you not test with 5970's?

    On a card for card basis they are still quite a bit more powerful than the GTX 480 and should require the most bandwidth of any current card for maximum performance.
    Reply
  • barmaley
    This review tells me that if you already have an i7 and at least 2xPCIe 16x lanes on your motherboard then in order to play modern games, all you are going to be upgrading for the next several years is your graphics.
    Reply
  • Aionism
    Even though I'm not interested in SLI I am glad to finally see a benchmark comparing PCI-E x16 and x4. My motherboard only allows me to use my video card in my x4 slot for some reason. I've been wondering how much performance I've been losing over that.
    Reply