Advanced Pentagon laser weapon shot down party balloons instead of drone by mistake, says report — airport shut down after Customs and Border Protection mistakenly believed it was targeting Mexican cartel drones

AV's mobile LOCUST Laser Weapon System
(Image credit: AeroVironment (AV) Inc.)

A frighteningly farcical series of events involving laser weaponry, the FAA, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the Pentagon has been retold by a trio of insiders talking to the Wall Street Journal. The punch-line, reportedly, is that the advanced LOCUST laser weapon system was used to shoot down party balloons over the U.S-Mexico border.

It is difficult to condense this self-satirizing chain of events, but as briefly as we can; agents from the CBP used an advanced Pentagon laser weapon to target ‘Cartel drones’ over the U.S.-Mexico border. However, insiders assert that the FAA had warned the CBP not to go ahead, had to suddenly close airspace over the target area, and diverted and delayed numerous flights for safety. The cherry on the silly cake is that the CBP actually shot down aerial objects that “turned out to likely be party balloons,” says the WSJ, which has sources who have had eyes-on debris analysis reports.

(Image credit: AeroVironment (AV) Inc.)

The WSJ frames the farcical incident as evidence of a long-standing spat between the various governmental, safety, and security agencies and the problematic communications between them. FAA, DOD, DHS and White House spokespersons haven’t responded to the WSJ’s requests for comment, as yet.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D., Ill.) urged the FAA and the Pentagon to coordinate better, reports the WSJ. “We could do something legislatively, but I’d rather that they just started talking to each other,” said Duckworth, who is a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Republicans, Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. Roger Wicker, hadn’t reportedly been briefed on the laser weapon farce, at the time of writing.

Authorities may yet release more solid investigatory information to clarify the timeline and series of events, and reveal any drone wreckage that was recovered. However, embarrassments tend to get swept under the rug, so if no traces of drone wreckage are found expect the authorities to remain quiet.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • jp7189
    They initially closed the airspace for 10 days!?!? following a laser shot?
    Reply
  • Gururu
    This is some serious The Dictator comedy level stuff.
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    The irony. One administration can't shoot down actual spy balloons until they travel half the country, and the next shoots down party balloons. The bigger anything is the more mistakes it's going to make.
    Reply
  • COLGeek
    Zaranthos said:
    The irony. One administration can't shoot down actual spy balloons until they travel half the country, and the next shoots down party balloons. The bigger anything is the more mistakes it's going to make.
    Vastly different scenarios.

    PSA: Just a friendly reminder to NOT spiral into political morass. Thank you.
    Reply
  • bill001g
    So if I am the bad guys smuggling drugs in with drones all I do is make sure I do it near a airport and the FAA will protect my drones from other agency shooting them down. Does the FAA not care that a drone might collide with a plane. Maybe they should just shut down the airport permanently because the drug smugglers are using drones and they are preventing anyone from stopping them.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    bill001g said:
    So if I am the bad guys smuggling drugs in with drones all I do is make sure I do it near a airport and the FAA will protect my drones from other agency shooting them down. Does the FAA not care that a drone might collide with a plane. Maybe they should just shut down the airport permanently because the drug smugglers are using drones and they are preventing anyone from stopping them.
    There is nothing new here but the person that decided to laser a party balloon.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    It's a lot cheaper to user a laser weapon than scrambling a fighter and firing expensive missiles. So, I'd say this is progress from the last party balloon shoot-down incident.

    Zaranthos said:
    The irony. One administration can't shoot down actual spy balloons until they travel half the country,
    That was never a question of capability, as fighters were scrambled to photograph it, early on - and the same were ultimately used to shoot it down. They had reasons for wanting to do it over water, like civilian safety & debris recovery. Not taking immediate action also demonstrated its ability to maneuver and made it abundantly evident that any claims of being a weather or scientific research vehicle were false. They might also have gathered useful signals intelligence by just observing it, for a while.

    Zaranthos said:
    the next shoots down party balloons. The bigger anything is the more mistakes it's going to make.
    Oh, there have been other shoot-downs of party balloons, particularly as radar sensitivity to balloon-like objects was increased after the 2023 incident you referred to.

    bill001g said:
    So if I am the bad guys smuggling drugs in with drones all I do is make sure I do it near a airport and the FAA will protect my drones from other agency shooting them down. Does the FAA not care that a drone might collide with a plane.
    I think the issue between the agencies was mostly a procedural one. Certainly, the FAA does not want drones flying near airports, nor anywhere they can interfere with regular air traffic, but they also don't want defense actions to pose a risk to civil aviation. Airports are somewhat routinely shut down by drone incursions.
    Reply
  • Gururu
    bit_user said:
    Oh, there have been other shoot-downs of party balloons, particularly as radar sensitivity to balloon-like objects was increased after the 2023 incident you referred to.
    I would be very interested in seeing actual frequency statistics because if there is anything I know, my people like to party and lose millions of party balloons annually to the skies of El Paso.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    Zaranthos said:
    The irony. One administration can't shoot down actual spy balloons until they travel half the country, and the next shoots down party balloons. The bigger anything is the more mistakes it's going to make.
    Completely different.

    And it absolutely wasn't a case of "can't".
    Rather..."lets follow it and see what it does".

    The jet that shot the balloon down took off a runway 1/2 mile from my office.
    Reply
  • edzieba
    bill001g said:
    So if I am the bad guys smuggling drugs in with drones all I do is make sure I do it near a airport and the FAA will protect my drones from other agency shooting them down. Does the FAA not care that a drone might collide with a plane. Maybe they should just shut down the airport permanently because the drug smugglers are using drones and they are preventing anyone from stopping them.
    Do you think the FAA can deploy some magical anti-LASER field? Or that cartels will just obligingly obey a NOTAM?

    The FAA issued the NOTAM because some yahoos with a high powered laser were about to start firing it off without confirming their targets, and that's an airspace that you want civilian aircraft to stay the hell away from.
    Reply