AI energy efficiency comparisons ‘unfair’ bleats Sam Altman, citing amount of energy needed to evolve, then train a human — one ‘takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart’ he argues

Sam Altman in India
(Image credit: Getty Images)

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman took part in a wide ranging Q&A on Friday, answering dozens of rapid-fire questions during a 60 minute session hosted by The Indian Express. Not for the first time, Altman stoked controversy. This time, he bemoaned “unfair” comparisons between the efficiency of AI inference queries and human thought. In Altman’s view the comparison is skewed as humans have millennia of evolutionary smarts and technology teachings behind them, yet individuals require “like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart.”

Chief Nerd clipped the eyebrow-raising Q&A segment for convenient sharing.

In the above video segment, the AI business torchbearer begins by stating “One of the things that is always unfair in this comparison is people talk about how much energy it takes to train an AI model relative to how much it costs a human to do one inference query.” But, according to Altman, it also takes a lot of energy to train a human.

Article continues below

“It takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart,” the OpenAI CEO said to the assembled audience awaiting gems of wisdom. Moreover, Altman wants to roll in the “evolution of the hundred billion people,” and humanity’s progress to “not to get eaten by predators and learn how to like figure out science and whatever,” into the equation. If we did that calculation, Altman appears to reason, “probably AI has already caught up on an energy efficiency basis… Measured that way.”

OpenAI tech also evolved - from the minds and technological feats of humans

We see a few leaps in Altman's expanded-timeline human vs AI efficiency comparison logic, that need to be addressed. For example, shouldn’t the AI computing world also roll in the prior ‘energy cost’ of human evolution, the Renaissance, and so on? Aliens didn’t provide the blueprints for ENIAC.

Some commentators have also argued that Altman is dehumanizing by reducing childhood, learning, and growth to their energy inputs. Others even wonder if Altman would prefer to see resources diverted from human to machine intelligence.

However, beyond the confines of this Tweet clip, to give it more context and be fairer to the OpenAI boss, he also takes the time to push for more sustainable energy solutions. Tapping more into sustainable resources would take massive consumers like OpenAI a little more out of the firing line as scarce resource competitors, as folks’ utility bills inch higher and higher.

The above Q&A took place in the wake of Altman, and other AI high rollers, meeting with PM Narendra Modi during a highly publicized week that underscored India’s importance as an AI growth engine.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

TOPICS
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • Notton
    By that argument, I could argue that OpenAI's energy consumption has caused humans to be starved and devolve into talking like an AI chatbot.
    And it took less than 10 years.
    Reply
  • coolitic
    That has to be the most ridiculous set of mental gymnastics that I've seen in a while.
    Reply
  • CelicaGT
    Pounding the table. It's all they have left.
    Reply
  • kva13
    Since AI is so efficient next logical conclusion will be to slaughter all humans and leave super efficient AI.
    Seen it somewhere ....
    Reply
  • Neilbob
    kva13 said:
    Since AI is so efficient next logical conclusion will be to slaughter all humans and leave super efficient AI.
    Seen it somewhere ....
    It's a great idea for a film. I wonder how such a film has never been made before...

    Only trouble is the film would be made using A.I. and all the stars would have an indeterminate number of fingers, hair that appears oddly as if it has been harvested from a child's doll, wearing clothes with misaligned buttons and zips that go nowhere. They would also be superimposed on a background that is so blurry it looks like it's been coated in Vaseline.
    Reply
  • SmokyBarnable
    Two years at Stanford is nothing like a well-rounded liberal arts education, and it’s showing in spades with these creeps.
    Reply
  • QuarterSwede
    Um, we’re doing all this AI nonsense for humans you dipshit.
    Reply
  • ravewulf
    Feels like there's a Matrix connection here as well
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    yes, but the human is living, can think for itself, & learn from what its taught...and can be self sufficent (it can grow its own food if wanted)
    Reply
  • blppt
    QuarterSwede said:
    Um, we’re doing all this AI nonsense for humans you dipshit.
    Only for a select few, of course.
    Reply