Amazon, Microsoft, and Google under investor pressure to disclose site-specific data center water and power consumption — more than a dozen shareholders ask for transparency ahead of annual investor meetings

A rendering of Meta’s planned data center in Louisiana
(Image credit: Meta)

More than a dozen investors are pressuring Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet's Google to provide detailed data on water and energy consumption at their U.S. data centers, Reuters reported today. The pressure comes as all three companies have recently scrapped multibillion-dollar data center projects following community opposition, and as North American data centers consumed nearly 1 trillion liters of water in 2025, according to market research firm Mordor Intelligence.

Water usage is still a key concern for AI data centers. Some estimates say that generating just 100 words with OpenAI's GPT-4 consumes three bottles of water. Last year, another study suggested that AI data centers use more water annually than people drink bottled water, globally.

Article continues below

All four major hyperscalers have adopted closed-loop cooling systems that use substantially less water than traditional evaporative methods, but the level of disclosure varies.

Data center water consumption involves more than closed-loop cooling, as well. The majority of water a data center consumes is indirect; i.e. for generating the electricity the data center will use. A 2024 study found that data centers (in general, not specifically AI data centers) consumed about 800 billion liters of water indirectly. Another 2025 study found the vast majority of water consumption happens offsite an AI data center.

Investors want site-level data to assess operational risks more accurately. "We haven't seen them disclosing enough about their water consumption (and the) impact on the local community," Jason Qi, lead technology analyst at Calvert Research and Management, told Reuters.

Josh Weissman, director of infrastructure capacity delivery at Amazon, told Reuters the company is "increasingly disclosing site-specific water consumption data where we operate." An Amazon spokesperson added that the company was committed to being a "good neighbor" and was investing in efficiency and water reduction efforts. A Microsoft spokesperson said environmental sustainability was "a core value." Google declined to comment, and Meta did not respond to Reuters' request.

The backdrop of this is the alarming rate of AI data center expansion. Last week, Bloomberg reported that nearly half of planned U.S. data center builds for 2026 have been delayed or canceled, largely due to infrastructure demands. Although there's a clear call from some investors for sustainability, there's also a question of practicality when new projects are being funded so quickly. The capital expenditure of companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta has shot up amid the AI boom, even if some projects will never actually be completed.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

With contributions from
  • CrazyCarrot911
    just one more nail in the coffin

    "Ai will solve all problems, bla bla bla.."

    sed omnia retrorsum fiunt
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    Google declined to comment

    ofc they did.
    Reply
  • Notton
    "We're a good neighbor"
    "No, you can't see the data to prove our claim"
    Reply
  • Stomx
    On the Middle East some BigTech's data centers are already 100% on solar (Dubai Moro Hub, 100MW power, key partners Microsoft and Dell). Besides they need also extra for cooling. Why not here? Death Valley is waiting unless they are superstitious with the place's name :)
    Reply
  • usertests
    Stomx said:
    On the Middle East some BigTech's data centers are already 100% on solar (Dubai Moro Hub, 100MW power, key partners Microsoft and Dell). Despite they need also extra for cooling. Why not here? Death Valley is waiting unless they are superstitious with the place's name :)
    According to this guy, you can get 24/7 solar at 5x panel efficiency in a sun-synchronous orbit; it's a no-brainer:

    Txt3Wodav1o:1087
    Reply
  • Stomx
    For him it is indeed no brainer. But if you will order to lift the solar battery on 500 km orbit, it will cost you $50,000 per every 500W battery of 20kg in weight (he charges $2,500-5,000 per kg of weight). He will not charge himself that "cosmic" price for sure :). Just the fuel is cheap and costs 100x less. Boosters now can last up to 500-1000 flights

    But for you and me the solar system will cost $100 Billion per 1 GW of power

    You still have a chance to recover this cost. Given the cost of electricity 10 cents per kWh this will take just "as little as" 100 years. We just have to live biblical 200-800 years
    Reply
  • Jabberwocky79
    Rather than reaching any compute threshold, the difficulty scaling the infrastructure needed may be what ultimately causes AI growth to level off.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Stomx said:
    But if you will order to lift the solar battery on 500 km orbit, it will cost you $50,000 per every 500W battery of 20kg in weight (he charges $2,500-5,000 per kg of weight). He will not charge himself that "cosmic" price for sure :). Just the fuel costs 100x less.
    It only works with a fully reusable Starship dropping the $/kg a lot, and they admit that. No Starship, no chance.

    If Starship works? Then, ehhhhhhhhhhhhh maybe.
    Reply
  • Arkitekt78
    Cant wait to hear the spin on this one.
    Reply
  • Arkitekt78
    Stomx said:
    On the Middle East some BigTech's data centers are already 100% on solar (Dubai Moro Hub, 100MW power, key partners Microsoft and Dell). Despite they need also extra for cooling. Why not here? Death Valley is waiting unless they are superstitious with the place's name :)
    Yes, lets keep a data center cool in the middle of one of the hottest places in the country, using solar that would require massive amounts of land.

    Work smarter, not harder.
    Reply