Symantec Software Update Rendered Many PCs Useless

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • everlast66
    "The support is a joke, the quality control is a joke, and the software is not much better."

    Seems like a pretty accurate description of Symantec to me.
    Reply
  • "Now might be a good time to ditch the decrepit operating system if the funds are available."

    That, or use a FOSS OS which costs, oh, $0, and, yeah, no antivirus needed either.
    Reply
  • mayne92
    Symantec and McAfee are both pieces of overpriced junk. I'm not going to go into my many years of stories of how they are junk - I'm sure everyone knows this by now.
    Reply
  • coder543
    Yes.. time to ditch the decrepit operating system called Windows. Buy Mac, install Linux, use Chromebooks or Tablets. Whatever it takes... it'll most likely end up lowering your IT costs.
    Reply
  • Camikazi
    coder543Yes.. time to ditch the decrepit operating system called Windows. Buy Mac, install Linux, use Chromebooks or Tablets. Whatever it takes... it'll most likely end up lowering your IT costs.Actually I believe those OSes mass used in a company will raise TCO. Reason being that those OSes usually don't come with built in software maker support like MS has which means IT will have to learn how to fix every little problem themselves instead of having specialists a call away to help fix it fast. That is one problem with free, since it is free there is no one but yourself and maybe scrounging through forums to fix problems. That is one of the reasons a lot of companies stay with MS, it is cheaper overall to use Windows.
    Reply
  • JackNaylorPE
    When every Windows "Upgrade" inevitably results in a reduction in PC performance, why should users upgrade ? Most of them still offer sacrifices to t e PC gods that they were wise enough to stick w/ XP over Vista. Aren't XP users getting the same experience on "Patch Tuesday" comes along as other Windows OS users ?

    When Symantec started spending more development time figuring out who to make PC's go haywire users life miserable the moment when their subscription expired, Symatntec stopped being a company whose products I support.
    Reply
  • Bloob
    CamikaziActually I believe those OSes mass used in a company will raise TCO. Reason being that those OSes usually don't come with built in software maker support like MS has which means IT will have to learn how to fix every little problem themselves instead of having specialists a call away to help fix it fast. That is one problem with free, since it is free there is no one but yourself and maybe scrounging through forums to fix problems. That is one of the reasons a lot of companies stay with MS, it is cheaper overall to use Windows.Also the fact that companies often have software that is "windows only", so moving to other platforms might not be possible.
    Reply
  • freggo
    "ditch the decrepit operating system"...

    Wrong conclusion. Ditch Symantec !!!
    Reply
  • coder543
    @Camikaze: this is only one example: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2009/03/french-police-saves-millions-of-euros-by-adopting-ubuntu/
    Reply
  • southernshark
    Yes obviously MS is a bad company since its 11 year old operating system was shut down by a third party program which MS had nothing to do with.

    More proof that the "i" crowd are "i"diots.
    Reply