Intel Claws Back Desktop PC and Notebook Market Share From AMD, First Time in Three Years

PCB Image
(Image credit: Shutterstock)
42

Update 2/3/21: We've added commentary from Dean McCarron of Mercury Research. 

The Mercury Research CPU market share results are in for the fourth quarter of 2020, with the headline news being that, during the quarter, Intel has clawed back share from AMD in the desktop PC market for the first time in three years. Intel also stopped its slide in notebook PCs, gaining share for the first time in three years. AMD lost share in the overall x86 market during the quarter, but notched a solid gain for the year. Meanwhile, AMD continued to make slow but steady gains in the server market.

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • escksu
    Well, this is the reality I have been trying to tell those AMD "fanatics" for a long time. Intel is nowhere in trouble or dying.

    Intel's dominance isn't built overnight, its not going to be demolished overnight as well. DEspite asll the performance and price advantage of Epyc over Xeons, Xeon servers still outsold Epyc ones by a massive margin (I would say easily 8:1). This is why the rise in market share for Eypc is so slow.

    Intel may be earning less from each CPU, but they are selling way more CPUs than ever and despite record shipments, Intel still couldn't make enough to sell. This shows the demand for Intel CPUs never did dwindle. The news we read are mostly from DIY and it represents just a tiny portion of the entire market.
    Reply
  • Endymio
    escksu said:
    Well, this is the reality I have been trying to tell those AMD "fanatics" for a long time. Intel is nowhere in trouble or dying...
    Interestingly enough, the last time -- many years ago -- that AMD was poised to knock Intel off its throne, that attempt was also derailed by supply-side issues. Seems like history does indeed repeat itself.
    Reply
  • Murissokah
    escksu said:
    Well, this is the reality I have been trying to tell those AMD "fanatics" for a long time. Intel is nowhere in trouble or dying.

    Intel's dominance isn't built overnight, its not going to be demolished overnight as well. DEspite asll the performance and price advantage of Epyc over Xeons, Xeon servers still outsold Epyc ones by a massive margin (I would say easily 8:1). This is why the rise in market share for Eypc is so slow.

    Intel may be earning less from each CPU, but they are selling way more CPUs than ever and despite record shipments, Intel still couldn't make enough to sell. This shows the demand for Intel CPUs never did dwindle. The news we read are mostly from DIY and it represents just a tiny portion of the entire market.

    Yeah, any talk of Intel being in trouble is foolish. What is much more realistic is the possibility that AMD's advantage in density via TSMC could cause Intel to outsource their cutting edge nodes, at least for a while. If we consider AMD started their recovery at around 1.5B valuation to confront a 150B+ Intel, it's no small feat that they might end up forcing Intel's hand.
    Reply
  • Freestyle80
    Internet fanboys: Intel will die soon!!!

    Intel makes still making sizable profits

    Internet fanboys: Surprised Pikachu face
    I dunno where this notion comes from that Intel will die out easily just because AMD has 'surpassed' them for once. These things dont change overnight
    Reply
  • Chung Leong
    The quarter in question is when Intel's Fab 42 came online, no? Having control over actual production of your chips does have it benefits.
    Reply
  • spongiemaster
    Murissokah said:
    What is much more realistic is the possibility that AMD's advantage in density via TSMC could cause Intel to outsource their cutting edge nodes, at least for a while. If we consider AMD started their recovery at around 1.5B valuation to confront a 150B+ Intel, it's no small feat that they might end up forcing Intel's hand.
    Don't forget the complete failure of Global Foundries, AMD's former manufacturing arm, to progress below their 14/12nm process is what allowed AMD to switch to TSMC's 7nm and below processes with no restrictions. As bad as Intel's foundries are doing with 10nm and below, they're doing better than AMD's which just gave up. If AMD was still stuck with GloFo as their main chip source right now with no process advantage over Intel, the market picture would be very different right now.
    Reply
  • OriginFree
    Freestyle80 said:
    Internet fanboys: Intel will die soon!!!

    Intel makes still making sizable profits

    Internet fanboys: Surprised Pikachu face
    I dunno where this notion comes from that Intel will die out easily just because AMD has 'surpassed' them for once. These things don't change overnight

    Agreed. Intel could get entirely out of the desktop and mobile markets and still make more money than AMD, just from the server and big iron margins.
    Now that said competition is always good for the end users and I do hope AMD hits that magical 25% at some point to keep Intel on their toes.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    did ppl seriously think intel would die out?

    sure, they werent doign so well, but intel is basically a titan compared to AMD.

    even if they stopped making ANY profit for a year they'd be perfectly fine.
    Reply
  • shady28
    AMD simply can't get sufficient allocation from TSMC to greatly increase their market share, at least not right now. The fact they do not own their own fabs and process tech can and is capping their growth potential.
    Reply
  • Ogotai
    wow, intel fanboys sure are blind. part of the reason why intel clawed anything back, was only because of amd's supply issues. if amd were able to supply enough cpus to all of those that wanted one, this story could of been vastly different. its awesome that it seems like now the only reply most intel fanboys have now against amd, is their supply issues.
    will intel die cause of a strong amd ? of course not. will/is intel hurting cause of a strong amd ? of course they are.
    Reply