AMD rebrands Ryzen 7035, 7020 series mobile processors — Zen 2 and Zen 3+ chips receive new identities
It appears that the period has once again arrived when chipmakers are rebadging some of their processors. Keen hardware enthusiast Gray has observed that AMD has rebranded certain Ryzen processors from its product stack; fortunately, these are not among the best CPUs, but rather some mobile chips from around 2023.
Rebranding in the processor industry is a widespread practice, despite being frowned upon. Launching new products helps to boost sales; it is sometimes more cost-effective to rebrand existing offerings. Recently, Intel employed this strategy with the Core Series 1, which includes models such as the Core 5 120 and the Core i5-110. The former, based on Raptor Lake and considered only a few generations old, is relatively current; however, the latter, originating from the Comet Lake architecture, is half a decade old. In response, AMD has also undertaken rebranding efforts for certain chips within its Zen 2 and Zen 3+ series.
AMD has focused its rebranding initiatives on the Ryzen 7035 (codenamed Rembrandt-R) and Ryzen 7020 (codenamed Mendocino) series. Rembrandt-R, which represents an update to the Ryzen 6000 (codenamed Rembrandt), has adopted the Ryzen 100 branding; concurrently, Mendocino will now carry the Ryzen 10 designation. The new model names are already reflected on AMD's website, so it shouldn't be long before retailers update their listings. The modifications are solely aesthetic, as the processor specifications remain unchanged.
Although AMD indicates the Ryzen 100 and Ryzen 10 series with a launch date of October 1, 2025, on its online product pages, it is important to recognize that these are rebranded chips rather than entirely new products or refreshes.
AMD Ryzen 7035 and Ryzen 7020 Rebranding
New Model Name | Previous Model Name | Codename | CPU / GPU Architecture |
|---|---|---|---|
Ryzen 7 170 | Ryzen 7 7735HS | Rembrandt-R | Zen 3+ / RDNA 2 |
Ryzen 7 160 | Ryzen 7 7735U | Rembrandt-R | Zen 3+ / RDNA 2 |
Ryzen 5 150 | Ryzen 5 7535HS | Rembrandt-R | Zen 3+ / RDNA 2 |
Ryzen 5 130 | Ryzen 5 7535U | Rembrandt-R | Zen 3+ / RDNA 2 |
Ryzen 3 110 | Ryzen 3 7335U | Rembrandt-R | Zen 3+ / RDNA 2 |
Ryzen 5 40 | Ryzen 5 7520U | Mendocino | Zen 2 / RDNA 2 |
Ryzen 3 30 | Ryzen 3 7320U | Mendocino | Zen 2 / RDNA 2 |
Athlon Gold 20 | Athlon Gold 7220U | Mendocino | Zen 2 / RDNA 2 |
Athlon Silver 10 | Athlon Silver 7120U | Mendocino | Zen 2 / RDNA 2 |
Instead of encountering model names such as Ryzen 7 7735HS or Ryzen 7 7735U on a laptop, consumers will now see labels like Ryzen 7 170 or Ryzen 7 160, respectively. These designations bear a resemblance to Intel's Core Series 1, such as the Core 5 120. While we admit that a three-digit format can simplify things, uninformed consumers might mistakenly believe these are new processors, whereas in reality, they are not.
Mendocino, on the other hand, features more concise model names utilizing a two-digit format. SKUs such as the Ryzen 5 7520U and the Ryzen 3 7320U are now reborn as the Ryzen 5 40 and Ryzen 3 30, respectively.
This is not the first time AMD has employed a three-digit numbering scheme for its Ryzen processors. The manufacturer adopted this format with the launch of the Ryzen AI 300 (codenamed Strix Point) and Ryzen 200 (codenamed Hawk Point Refresh) earlier this year. Therefore, the recent rebadges of Rembrandt-R and Mendocino may represent AMD's efforts to standardize its product lineup.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
How AMD will name its future processors remains uncertain. The chipmaker has exhausted its four-digit naming convention with the recent Ryzen 9000 (codenamed Granite Ridge) processors. Unless AMD adopts a strategy similar to Intel's by using five-digit numerical identifiers such as 10,000, it may have to begin integrating superfluous keywords like "AI" or "Ultra" into shorter model names. Alternatively, AMD could maintain the three-digit naming scheme by continuing with the Ryzen 400 series and progressing thereafter.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.
-
Notton They must have made billions of Mendostinkers to still have a enough for world distribution in 2025.Reply -
User of Computers Eew. People bash Intel over the head for this, but at least they boost the clocks. These are just straight-up rebrands with no clock bump, nor any other improvements or better features. Honestly pretty disappointing.Reply -
usertests Reply
A 7520U is around an i7-7700 in performance, except with a faster RDNA2 iGPU, AV1 decode, etc. Not bad, except for the single-channel memory, and no DDR5/SODIMMs supported.Notton said:They must have made billions of Mendostinkers to still have a enough for world distribution in 2025.
What would be interesting is if they started selling the Ryzen Z2 A (Steam Deck 1 APU) for laptops. Same N6 node as Mendocino, bigger die, but a lot more desirable. Give the world another 10,000 wafers full of those instead, please.
They're good enough without a 1-2% boost from clocks. No other improvements could be expected if they are using the same dies.User of Computers said:Eew. People bash Intel over the head for this, but at least they boost the clocks. These are just straight-up rebrands with no clock bump, nor any other improvements or better features. Honestly pretty disappointing.
Rebrandeon is annoying, but the real problem with laptop chips has always been pricing. Mendocino has been overpriced from start to finish. A new name could even be an excuse to keep the pricing high.
AMD is expected to start making chiplet-based APUs soon, so maybe they can make subtle changes in the future without needing to redesign monolithic dies. But I'd still expect them to keep selling the same chips with no changes. -
dalek1234 Aligning older processors to the new naming scheme makes sense. Keeping two different naming schemes will only add to the confusion created by the cryptic, old naming scheme.Reply -
m3city And its wrong why exactly? If it was with a press release saying "hey, we are pleased to announce a new, shiny cpus" then yes. Otherwise, no.Reply
An inquisitive user would dive to specs anyway, and see that these are zen2 (while there is nothing wrong with it, but one may always compare it with anything else for perf), an ordinary user would not care. If the price us right for his wallet, then he buys it, and I pretty sure ant if these cpus will do it's job. -
salgado18 This is awful for one important reason: it lost the letter that tells if the chip is focused on low energy or high performance. A 7535U has low base clocks and is meant for battery efficiency, a 7535H has high base clocks and is meant for high performance plugged to the wall. Now they are 130 and 150. It's not that the 150 is more powerful, but it has an entirely different power profile. Now it just seems like a simple upgrade. Once again the consumer lost.Reply -
reflex25 I am a keen customer of AMD (something to do with a US lawsuit in 1993), but their range of CPU's APU's and modules is almost impossible to comprehend and now they are changing the model numbers. Please could they simplify this. I waited ages for the 9600G, but in the end opted for a Stix Halo module in an HP Mini Z2.Reply
I am very pleased with this, but what muddle.