AMD launches four new Ryzen CPUs, including cut-down Zen 4 and Zen 3 models — most only available in global markets

Ryzen 9000
(Image credit: AMD)

AMD has quietly released four new Ryzen CPUs without any official acknowledgement beyond adding the specs of each CPU to its website. The new chips are the eight-core Ryzen 7 9700F, six-core Ryzen 5 9500F, six-core Ryzen 5 7400, and six-core Ryzen 5 5600F.

The Ryzen 7 9700F and Ryzen 5 9500F are new chiplet-style Zen 5 processors that lack integrated graphics. The 9700F is an eight-core chip featuring 32MB of L3 cache, 65W TDP, 3.8GHz base clock, and 5.5GHz peak boost clock. The 9500F features six Zen 5 CPU cores, 32MB of L3 cache, 65W TDP, a base clock of 3.8 GHz, and a peak boost clock of 5.2 GHz.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Row 0 - Cell 0

Architecture

Cores / Threads

L3 Cache / TDP

Base / Boost Clocks

Ryzen 7 9700F

Zen 5

8 / 16

32 MB / 65W

3.8 GHz / 5.5 GHz

Ryzen 5 9500F

Zen 5

6 / 12

32 MB / 65W

3.8 GHz / 5 GHz

Ryzen 5 7400

Zen 4

6 / 12

16 MB / 65W

3.3 GHz / 4.3 GHz

Ryzen 5 5600F

Zen 3

6 / 12

32 MB / 65W

3.0 GHz / 4.0 GHz

The two chips are essentially F-series versions of the Ryzen 7 9700X and Ryzen 5 9600/9600X that lack integrated graphics. This is especially the case with the 9700F, as it shares the same specs as the 9700X from the cores and cache, all the way down to the base and boost clocks as well. The Ryzen 5 9500F is also very similar to the Ryzen 5 9600/9600X, but both have higher clock speeds, with the 9600 boasting a 200MHz higher clock speed than the 9500F.

The Ryzen 5 7400 is a new entry-level Zen-4 CPU featuring six cores, 16 MB of L3 cache, 65W TDP, a base clock of 3.3GHz, and a maximum boost clock of 4.3GHz. This CPU is arguably one of the most unorthodox chips to come out from AMD, being one of the very first chips to come out after its F-series counterpart (the Ryzen 5 7400F has been on the market for several months).

What's even stranger is the CPU's L3 cache configuration of just 16MB. Traditionally, the 16MB cache limit is targeted at AMD's monolithic APUs, which physically don't hold more than 16 MB of L3 cache. However, the Ryzen 5 7400 is classified with the Raphael codename, meaning it takes advantage of AMD's chiplet-style design, which incorporates 32MB of L3 cache. Apparently, AMD has opted to disable half the L3 cache on this chip, probably as a method of reducing waste on potentially defective Zen 4 dies with defective L3 cache.

This strange configuration also makes the Ryzen 5 7400 a significantly different processor than its twin-by-name-alone, the Ryzen 5 7400F. While the 7400F lacks integrated graphics, it is a noticeably better processor, boasting a 400MHz higher base clock and boost clock, and 32MB of L3 cache. It could be argued that the Ryzen 5 7400 has more in common with the Ryzen 5 8500G, which has just 16MB of L3 cache, integrated graphics, and six cores, though those cores consist of Zen 4 and Zen 4c cores.

The Ryzen 5 5600F is yet another Zen 3 part coming to the market. As the name states, the 5600F is another variant of the 5600/5600X featuring six Zen 3 cores, 32MB of L3 cache, 65W TDP, a 3.5GHz base clock, and a 4.4GHz peak boost clock. This chip is also somewhat unorthodox, sporting the F-series nomenclature. Chips with this nomenclature usually have disabled integrated graphics, but the Ryzen 5000 series does not support integrated graphics at all.

Apparently, the "F" in this case denotes reduced performance compared to its vanilla counterpart. The Ryzen 5 5600 features a 500MHz higher base clock and 400MHz higher boost clock than the 5600F.

The new Zen 3 chips are not the only recent re-use of old silicon. Intel has also re-released its 10th Gen Core "Comet Lake" silicon as the Core i5-110 in its Ultra Series 1 line.

These CPUs, specifically the 7400 and 5600F, continue to demonstrate AMD's commitment to providing as many solutions as possible. The main reason most of the more unorthodox chips exist is for global markets, particularly Asia or Latin America (like the Ryzen 5 5500X3D). The Ryzen 5 7400F is regionally exclusive to China and other Asian markets, the Ryzen 5 5600F is locked to the Asia-Pacific / Japan region, and the Ryzen 7 9700F is locked to North America. The Ryzen 5 9500F is the only chip of the bunch that boasts regional availability.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

TOPICS
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • WezzleH
    "the Ryzen 5000 series does not support integrated graphics at all"

    Um, there's several "G" variants, and it's obvious this is a 5600G with the graphics disabled.
    Reply
  • King_V
    WezzleH said:
    "the Ryzen 5000 series does not support integrated graphics at all"

    Um, there's several "G" variants, and it's obvious this is a 5600G with the graphics disabled.

    This is NOT a 5600G with graphics disabled. The 5500 is a 5600G with graphics disabled, and slightly downclocked.

    The 5600F has lower base and boost speeds than either of them. Also, Vermeer cores have 32MB L3 cache. Cezanne cores (5600G, 5500) have 16MB L3.
    Reply
  • usertests
    King_V said:
    The 5600F has lower base and boost speeds than either of them. Also, Vermeer cores have 32MB L3 cache. Cezanne cores (5600G, 5500) have 16MB L3.
    It's possible for L3 cache to be partially disabled. For example, the 5300G has 8 MiB instead of 16 MiB. I didn't find any Vermeer CPUs with disabled L3, and the 5600F has the full 32 MiB. Being Vermeer, it gets PCIe 4.0 support, which could make or break a budget build with an x4 or x8 GPU.

    I found that the last time AMD disabled L3 on a desktop CPU (not APU) were the Zen 2 Matisse-based 3500, 3300X, and 3100. The 3300X used an intact 4-core CCX with the full 16 MiB, while the 3500 and 3100 used both CCXs with only 8 MiB active each.

    On AM5, only the 8300G has less cache than its die came with, so far.

    Cache yields must be very high because AMD rarely disables it.
    Reply
  • DS426
    WezzleH said:
    "the Ryzen 5000 series does not support integrated graphics at all"

    Um, there's several "G" variants, and it's obvious this is a 5600G with the graphics disabled.
    Yeah... author meant to say "Ryzen 5000 series desktop CPU's"?

    There's also 35W TDP variants of the APU's like 5600GE. Those are neat little chips IMO.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    DDR4 price and availability trends should be drawing the life of AM4 to a nearing conclusion. AMD needs to focus more on low-cost AM5 options, though I expect a lot of cost-conscious consumers will opt for mini-PCs with BGA laptop CPUs. Either way, it's time for AMD to move on.

    FWIW, I have a 5800X in a machine I plan to keep for a long time. So, I have no personal issues with Ryzen 5000. It's just commercial factors that seem to be working against it.
    Reply
  • beyondlogic
    bit_user said:
    DDR4 price and availability trends should be drawing the life of AM4 to a nearing conclusion. AMD needs to focus more on low-cost AM5 options, though I expect a lot of cost-conscious consumers will opt for mini-PCs with BGA laptop CPUs. Either way, it's time for AMD to move on.

    FWIW, I have a 5800X in a machine I plan to keep for a long time. So, I have no personal issues with Ryzen 5000. It's just commercial factors that seem to be working against it.

    im assuming these are just left over binned chips that just didnt make the cut better to sell them then dump them in a bin personally. it will become pointless eventually depends on what pricing these chips come out to.
    Reply
  • LabRat 891
    Little confusing use of the "F" suffix...
    Historically, that's been used to denote an APU/CPU+iGP w/ its iGP permanently disabled.

    With the 5000series,
    the 5500 is an APU with its iGP disabled yet the 5600F is just a lower-clocking newer revision 5600...
    Reply
  • nogaard777
    AMD really just can't bring themselves to ever take the garbage out and dump it can they?
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    nogaard777 said:
    AMD really just can't bring themselves to ever take the garbage out and dump it can they?
    People love getting cheap stuff and companies love making money...win-win.
    No reason to dump perfectly working stuff into the landfill.

    (rant:
    As a person you should even try to fix broken stuff, or sell/give it to somebody that can do it, to not let it end up in a landfill.
    Plenty of people out there that don't need anything even close to the newest thing. )
    Reply
  • nogaard777
    TerryLaze said:
    People love getting cheap stuff and companies love making money...win-win.
    No reason to dump perfectly working stuff into the landfill.

    (rant:
    As a person you should even try to fix broken stuff, or sell/give it to somebody that can do it, to not let it end up in a landfill.
    Plenty of people out there that don't need anything even close to the newest thing. )
    Maybe, but if Intel dug some low end 10100 out of the garbage to sell would you say that they're still supporting lga1200? I think it's hilarious how many people are using this to say AMD is still supporting am4.
    Reply