AMD reportedly prepping new X3D chip with higher clock speeds – Ryzen 7 9700X3D spotted in benchmarks that rival Ryzen 7 9800X3D, new Strix Halo chip also unearthed
Update, 11/9/2025 7:20am PT: According to a Reddit post by u/A_Canadian_boi, the listing for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X3D on the PassMark benchmark database was submitted by accident. The user explains that after discussing AMD’s Zen 5 architecture and the CPUID instruction with friends, they discovered that AMD’s MSRs (Model-Specific Registers) can be edited.
To test this theory, they modified a heavily PBO’d Ryzen 7 9700X to appear as a “9700X3D” by editing the /proc/cpuinfo file. After running a quick PassMark test, they found that the benchmarking software failed to detect the mismatch between /proc/cpuinfo and the actual CPUID, and even submitted the results to the live PassMark database. In short, according to this new information, there is no Ryzen 7 9700X3D out in the wild; the listing was simply a result of a sneaky experiment.
The original story, including our original sprinklings of salt, continues below:
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is currently the best CPU you can buy for gaming, offering outstanding performance that easily surpasses Intel’s best. A new leak suggests that a more affordable alternative could be on the way: the Ryzen 7 9700X3D. According to the PassMark benchmark database, the unreleased 3D V-cache-equipped processor has 8 cores and 16 threads and leverages the AM5 platform.
The boost clock speed of the Ryzen 7 9700X3D is listed at 5.8 GHz, a substantial jump over the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, which tops out at 5.2 GHz. That's a substantial increase that could indicate a number of possibilities, such as a higher clock to attain faster speeds, a data entry error, or that the benchmark testing was done on an overclocked chip. As for the benchmark itself, the CPU scored 40,438 points in multi-threaded and 4,687 points in single-threaded benchmarks. The result is pretty much in line with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D in the same tests, where the existing chip scored 39,982 in multi-threaded and 4,427 in single-threaded.
| Street/MSRP | Arch | Cores / Threads | Base / Boost Clock (GHz) | Cache (L2/L3) | TDP / PPT | Memory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ryzen 7 9800X3D | $480 | Zen 5 X3D | 8 / 16 | 4.7 / 5.2 | 104MB (8+96) | 120W / 162W | DDR5-5600 |
Ryzen 7 9700X3D* | NA | Zen 5 X3D | 8 / 16 | NA / 5.8 | NA | NA | NA |
The benchmark database additionally lists a brand new Strix Halo part, namely the Ryzen AI MAX+ 388. This chip scored 31,702 points in multi-threaded and 4,145 points in single-threaded benchmarks on PassMark. By the looks of it, this particular chip should sit between the Ryzen AI MAX+ 390 and AI MAX+ 385 and could potentially be a China-exclusive SKU.
Additional information from the listing suggests that it features a total of 8 cores and 16 threads, 32 MB of L3 cache, and 8 MB of L2 cache. Interestingly, it also comes with the Radeon 8060S iGPU, featuring 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units, similar to the flagship Ryzen AI MAX+ 395. In case you missed our coverage, the Radeon 8060S is currently the most powerful integrated GPU solution offering performance that is very similar to an RTX 4060.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
The introduction of a new X3D chip is definitely exciting, especially since the Ryzen 7 9800X3D currently goes for around $450. A potentially cheaper option would give users more choice when upgrading or building a brand-new gaming rig. Having said that, leaked benchmark results are not proof of existence; however, we expect AMD to make some sort of announcement at the upcoming Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in January 2026. Till then, take all of the information above with a pinch of salt.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Kunal Khullar is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. He is a long time technology journalist and reviewer specializing in PC components and peripherals, and welcomes any and every question around building a PC.
-
scottsoapbox Incredibly unlikely for the 9700x3D to be faster than the 9800x3D despite the author’s wishes.Reply -
Notton There's no way AMD would release a 9700X3D with higher clocks than a 9800X3D... They'd name it the 9805X3D or something like that.Reply
I find the Ryzen Max+ 388 to be way more interesting.
AFAIK, there is also a Max+ 392 with 12 cores and 40CU -
Makaveli The 5.8 Boost clocks don't make sense for a chip that is most likely one that failed to make the bin for the 9800X3D.Reply
So either passmark is wrong or it was the 9850X3D chip that was tested because that chip with 5.6 Boost + 200Mhz from PBO will be at 5.8 -
LabRat 891 This appears to be 2 separate rumors, combined.Reply
The '9850X3D' rumor (higher clocked 9800X3D)
and
The '9700X3D' rumor/expectation.
9700X3D will likely (eventually) exist, as it'd simply be poor-binning 9800X3D-destined parts. -
WonkoTheSaneUK I suspect that (if it surfaces) the 9700X3D would be a 6 core / 12 thread CPU, not an 8/16 like the 9800X3DReply -
salgado18 Reply
From the past, the x700 has the same cores as the x800, just lower clocks. It seems to be a 9700X3D overclocked for testing.WonkoTheSaneUK said:I suspect that (if it surfaces) the 9700X3D would be a 6 core / 12 thread CPU, not an 8/16 like the 9800X3D -
Pegaroo Reply
Or whoever has leaked it has been over clocking and maybe using sub ambient coolingMakaveli said:The 5.8 Boost clocks don't make sense for a chip that is most likely one that failed to make the bin for the 9800X3D.
So either passmark is wrong or it was the 9850X3D chip that was tested because that chip with 5.6 Boost + 200Mhz from PBO will be at 5.8 -
wakuwaku Reply
This person appears to be using AI to summarize articles and they don't bother to scrutinize the output.LabRat 891 said:This appears to be 2 separate rumors, combined.
The '9850X3D' rumor (higher clocked 9800X3D)
and
The '9700X3D' rumor/expectation.
9700X3D will likely (eventually) exist, as it'd simply be poor-binning 9800X3D-destined parts.
Why I say this?
If you bothered to read the whole article and click on the citation link given, you would know the article is not about rumors.
It is about a passmark result, a legitimate benchmark software. Their results are uploaded by their software directly to their website. Another familiar benchmark that does the same is geekbench.
Unless maybe your AI decided that passmark is also an AI generating software that uploads fake information to a rumor spreading website. -
LabRat 891 Reply
Not sure to take that as a compliment, or an insult. -it's not the first time my own thoughts, opinions, and/or speech have been accused of plagiarism or AI-generation.wakuwaku said:This person appears to be using AI to summarize articles and they don't bother to scrutinize the output.
Have you read the title?" AMD reportedly prepping new X3D chip with higher clock speeds – Ryzen 7 9700X3D spotted in benchmarks that rival Ryzen 7 9800X3D"wakuwaku said:Why I say this?
If you bothered to read the whole article and click on the citation link given, you would know the article is not about rumors.
Rumor(s). -and one that doesn't seem to make a lot of sense.
At least not after skimming, re-skimming, reading the sections of interest about the bench and the purported model, then reading thru comments.
There's been recurring/ongoing rumors about a new higher-clocked 8c/16t x3d zen5 chip. It last hit the news alongside recent 9950x3d2 rumors.
The article claims the screencap is from a higher-than 9800X3D boosting 8c/16T. That doesn't make a lot of sense on its face (excepting a dual 4c CCD design 🤢).
Beyond that, there's been murmurs and open wantings for a 'budget' 8c/16t single-CCD vCache Zen5 CPU (ala 5800X3D->5700X3D) since at least earlier this year.
Until there's an AMD Press Release/Event or Silent Retail Release, screen caps (and public database entries) of benchmarks-ran are still rumors at best. As I recall over the years, there's been several lab-only samples that have seen public benchmark databases; never materializing into real and tangible, market-available product.wakuwaku said:It is about a passmark result, a legitimate benchmark software. Their results are uploaded by their software directly to their website. Another familiar benchmark that does the same is geekbench.
I'd say you're AI-paranoid, but it literally is everywhere. :oops:wakuwaku said:Unless maybe your AI decided that passmark is also an AI generating software that uploads fake information to a rumor spreading website.
'Better to be called an idiot, or a bot? 🤔 not sure...
I have been called "Great Value Grok", though. -
Auxityne https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1orc6jl/my_friends_and_i_accidentally_faked_the_ryzen_7/Reply
So much for that idea.