Windows Phone 8.1 May Support 10" Screens

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • legacyBIOS
    This.....this is news right here...
    Reply
  • mrmez
    WTF am I going to do with a 10" phone?
    Reply
  • wemakeourfuture
    tablet with phone capabilities is one thing.

    trying to market and sell a 10" phone is plain stupidity
    Reply
  • Nikolai Allen
    There is not one article I've ever read on Toms Hardware that didn't have at least a paragraph talking about the lack of apps on Windows Phone. I mean come on guys, this article really didn't even call for that.
    Reply
  • fleeb
    11689317 said:
    WTF am I going to do with a 10" phone?

    Ever heard of iOS? You know, that OS that supports 4", 8", and 10" screens?
    Reply
  • mrmez
    I didn't realise that, even though I have both an iphone and ipad.

    So "Windows Phone" is both a physical phone and an OS?

    I thought the whole point of the RT tablets was that it runs W8, and not some dumbed down mobile OS. So of course the best thing to do is ANOTHER u turn and dumb it down to a phone level.

    In other words, don't buy anything from M$ because they can't make up their minds are could easily discontinue anything at a moments notice.
    Reply
  • back_by_demand
    To all the dummies saying this means a 10" phone, this is putting the Windows Phone OS on a 10" device - does NOT mean it will be a phone. I suppose if iOS goes on a 9.7" screen it's a big iPhone and not an iPad? That's the same dumb logic you are trying to apply.
    Reply
  • ddpruitt
    I would like to point out that 10" screen is not a useful measurement (ever hear of 10ft interface?). Rather devs look at pixels and pixel density (and this is how Android handles it). And as I recall MS promised consistent and automatic screen adjustment for applications across a huge range of sizes back in the 90s. It didn't happen then and I doubt it'll happen now.
    Reply
  • socalboomer
    "Typically users navigate away from an app by pressing the Start button, and then open a new app, just like iPhone owners. Users also don't seem to realize that by repeatedly hitting the back button, they're "stacking" apps. Thus the source claims that Microsoft now believes the Back button just doesn't make sense."

    Really? Not that there are a lot of us out there, but this isn't accurate.

    First, the back button is how you close applications and repeatedly hitting the back button doesn't stack apps; it's how you close a stack of apps. . .

    Second, it is by hitting the start button and opening a new app - THAT is how you stack apps, just like with the iPhone.

    Third, the back button doesn't make sense. MS should do two things - 1. make a method to close the app that is its own method - swipe down from the top (like in W8) or something. 2. keep the back button (really handy in a LOT of apps) but make it consistently "go back" instead of "sometimes go back and sometimes exit the program" which I know frustrates me and my wife.

    LOVE WP8 aside from that and the lack of apps. I really do - smooth, integrated, easy. . .
    Reply
  • JD88
    A tablet somewhere around 8" running Windows Phone OS would probably be a hit. It wouldn't need the massive amount of storage that RT or 8 need, and would be fast on low power ARM chips. I think this is a good idea as it's virtually impossible to take advantage of the desktop at smaller screen sizes anyway as I think 10" is about the smallest I would go.
    Reply