CPU Benchmarks and Hierarchy 2026: CPU Rankings

Our CPU benchmark hierarchy provides a broad view of relative performance for the latest Intel and AMD processors. Over the last 30 years, Tom’s Hardware has been benchmarking CPUs, and we use the rankings here as the basis of our best CPUs for gaming and best budget CPU rankings. We run over 200 individual tests for each CPU we look at, and that comprehensive performance is condensed here for a high-level view of how CPUs compare across gaming, single-threaded, and multithreaded performance.

In games, AMD’s Ryzen 7 9850X3D is the fastest CPU on the market, though other Zen 5 X3D offerings like the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen 7 9800X3D aren’t far behind. X3D chips dominate the charts for gaming at 1080p, with the other exception being the relatively unpopular (and expensive) Ryzen 9 7900X3D. Otherwise, Intel’s last-gen Core i9-14900K is the fastest offering from Team Blue, with the new Core Ultra 7 270K Plus coming in slightly behind with Intel’s new iBOT feature.

Intel pulls out strong positions in applications; however, with the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus topping the charts in single-threaded performance and coming in third in multi-threaded rankings. It’s only beaten by the Ryzen 9 9950X and its X3D variant, and only by a hair. Further, both of those CPUs cost about twice as much. We’re still waiting on AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X3D2 to hit shelves, which is poised to claim a top slot in productivity performance.

In each section below, we’ll show you the rankings for each CPU, as well as reveal what tests went into creating the rankings. We’ll also give you some pointers for benchmarking your own CPU to see how much performance an upgrade or overclock netted you, along with some common, easy-to-run benchmarks you can perform yourself.

CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026

In the album above, you can see our master charts for gaming, single-threaded, and multi-threaded performance for CPUs. For games, all of our testing was done with an Nvidia RTX 5090 FE, and for applications, our testing was done with an Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti FE. For applications, no compute is actively running on the GPU; it’s a glorified display output that shares a driver with our gaming GPU. You can find a full breakdown of the test benches we used at the end of this article.

Gaming CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Gaming CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026

CPU / (MSRP)

Street Price

1080p Gaming Score

Architecture

Cores/Threads (P+E)

Base/Boost Clock (GHz)

TDP / Maximum Power

Ryzen 7 9850X3D ($500)

$499

100%

Zen 5 X3D

8 / 16

4.7 / 5.6

120W / 162W

Ryzen 7 9800X3D ($480)

$464

97%

Zen 5 X3D

8 / 16

4.7 / 5.2

120W / 162W

Ryzen 9 9950X3D ($700)

$676

95.7%

Zen 5 X3D

16 / 32

4.3 / 5.7

170W / 230W

Ryzen 9 9900X3D ($600)

$530

86.9%

Zen 5 X3D

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.5

120W / 230W

Ryzen 7 7800X3D ($450)

$399

85.6%

Zen 4 X3D

8 / 16

4.2 / 5

120W / 162W

Ryzen 9 7950X3D ($700)

$650

83.9%

Zen 4 X3D

16 / 32

4.2 / 5.7

120W / 162W

Ryzen 5 7600X3D ($300)

$246

80.6%

Zen 4 X3D

6 / 12

4.1 / 4.7

65W / 88W

Core i9-14900K ($550)

$469

78.2%

Raptor Lake Refresh

24 / 32 (8+16)

3.2 / 6

125W / 253W

Core Ultra 7 270K Plus ($300)

$350

77.5%

Arrow Lake Refresh

24 / 24 (8+16)

3.7 / 5.5

125W / 250W

Ryzen 7 7900X3D ($600)

Out of Stock

77.1%

Zen 4 X3D

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.6

120W / 162W

Ryzen 9 9950X ($650)

$520

76.9%

Zen 5

16 / 32

4.7 / 5/7

170W / 230W

Core i9-13900K ($590)

Out of Stock

76.8%

Raptor Lake

24 / 32 (8+16)

3 / 5.8

125W / 253W

Core i7-14700K ($410)

$340

76.4%

Raptor Lake Refresh

20 / 28 (8+12)

3.4 / 5.6

125W / 253W

Core i7-13700K ($410)

Out of Stock

75.8%

Raptor Lake

16 / 24 (8+8)

3.4 / 5.4

125W / 253W

Ryzen 9 9900X ($500)

$439

73.9%

Zen 5

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.6

120W / 162W

Core Ultra 5 250K Plus ($200)

$220

73.3%

Arrow Lake Refresh

18 / 18 (6+12)

4.2 / 5.3

125W / 159W

Core i5-14600K ($320)

$300

72.8%

Raptor Lake Refresh

14 / 20 (6+8)

3.5 / 5.3

125W / 181W

Ryzen 5 9600X ($280)

$188

72.6%

Zen 5

6 / 12

3.9 / 5.4

65W / 88W

Core Ultra 9 285K ($590)

$557

71.8%

Arrow Lake

24 / 24 (8+16)

3.7 / 5.7

125W / 250W

Ryzen 9 7950X ($700)

Out of Stock

71%

Zen 4

16 / 32

4.5 / 5.7

170W / 230W

Core i5-13600K ($320)

$319

70.9%

Raptor Lake

14 / 20 (6+8)

3.5 / 5.1

125W / 181W

Ryzen 7 7700X ($400)

$249

70.6%

Zen 4

8 / 16

4.5 / 5.4

105W / 142W

Core Ultra 7 265K ($400)

$284

70.3%

Arrow Lake

20 / 20 (8+12)

3.9 / 5.5

125W / 250W

Ryzen 9 7900X ($550)

$299

69.2%

Zen 4

12 / 24

4.7 / 5.6

170W / 230W

Ryzen 5 7600X ($300)

$180

67.3%

Zen 4

6 / 12

4.7 / 5.3

105W / 142W

Core Ultra 5 245K ($320)

$202

67.1%

Arrow Lake

14 / 14 (6+8)

4.2 / 5.2

125W / 159W

Core i7-12700K ($410)

$285

65.8%

Alder Lake

12 / 20 (8+4)

3.6 / 5

125W / 190W

Core Ultra 5 225 ($183)

$180

62.5%

Arrow Lake

10 / 10 (6+4)

3.3 / 4.9

65W / 121W

Core i5-12600K ($290)

$185

60.8%

Alder Lake

10 / 16 (6+4)

3.7 / 4.9

125W / 150W

Core i5-14400 ($220)

$250

58%

Raptor Lake

10 / 16 (6+4)

2.5 / 4.7

65W / 154W

You can see the relative score for AMD and Intel CPUs above, measured against the Ryzen 7 9850X3D, which is the fastest gaming CPU on the market, per our testing. So, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D offers 97.04% of the performance of the Ryzen 7 9850X3D, while the Ryzen 9 7900X offers 69.28% of the performance. You can set any CPU as a baseline for comparison with Bench, which is available in Tom’s Hardware Premium.

All of our gaming tests were run with the RTX 5090 FE at 1080p with a mixture of High and Ultra settings. We run each test multiple times — usually between three and five — and pick the median result. In other words, the results we use are real, recorded runs, not an average of several different runs. This is important as some games, such as Far Cry 6, show great CPU scaling but are otherwise inconsistent run-to-run.

In addition to consistent hardware (test benches at the end of this article), we use a consistent test image between platforms. That means the same GPU driver, the same Windows install, the game version, etc. We also tested with Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) turned off, Resizable BAR turned on, and automatic overclocking features disabled. That includes the Intel Extreme power profile and AMD’s PBO, both of which aren’t covered under standard warranty.

For this refresh, we tested 17 games and then calculated a geometric mean of the results. A simple average would provide skewed results with such a large test pool. A geomean provides a more realistic view of how each CPU compares to the others.

Here are the games that we used for testing:

  • Counter-Strike 2
  • The Last of Us Part One
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Starfield
  • A Plague Tale: Requiem
  • Hogwarts Legacy
  • F1 24
  • Marvel’s Spider-Man 2
  • Baldur’s Gate 3
  • Monster Hunter: Wilds
  • Final Fantasy XIV
  • Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024
  • Doom: The Dark Ages
  • Oblivion Remastered
  • Far Cry 6
  • Hitman 3
  • Minecraft RTX

We’re constantly evaluating new games to include in our test suite — see our recent stories on Resident Evil Requiem CPU scaling and Crimson Desert CPU scaling — but we maintain a list of tried-and-true benchmarks for our hierarchy rankings. We want to avoid including brand-new titles, which may see many updates, to keep our rankings as true to reality as possible. If you want more about the rationale behind our game choices, see our behind the scenes look at our CPU hierarchy testing.

Single-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026

Swipe to scroll horizontally
2026 Single-Threaded CPU Benchmarks
Row 0 - Cell 0

Single-Threaded App Score

Architecture

Cores/Threads (P+E)

Base/Boost Clock (GHz)

TDP / Maximum Power

Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

100%

Arrow Lake Refresh

24 / 24 (8+16)

3.7 / 5.5

125W / 250W

Core Ultra 9 285K

98.5%

Arrow Lake

24 / 24 (8+16)

3.7 / 5.7

125W / 250W

Core Ultra 7 265K

96.8%

Arrow Lake

20 / 20 (8+12)

3.9 / 5.5

125W / 250W

Core i9-14900K

95.4%

Raptor Lake Refresh

24 / 32 (8+16)

3.2 / 6

125W / 253W

Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

94%

Arrow Lake Refresh

18 / 18 (6+12)

4.2 / 5.3

125W / 159W

Ryzen 9 9950X

93.3%

Zen 5

16 / 32

4.7 / 5/7

170W / 230W

Ryzen 7 9850X3D

93.2%

Zen 5 X3D

8 / 16

4.7 / 5.6

120W / 162W

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

92.8%

Zen 5 X3D

16 / 32

4.3 / 5.7

170W / 230W

Core Ultra 5 245K

92.5%

Arrow Lake

14 / 14 (6+8)

4.2 / 5.2

125W / 159W

Core i9-13900K

92.4%

Raptor Lake

24 / 32 (8+16)

3 / 5.8

125W / 253W

Ryzen 9 9900X

92.2%

Zen 5

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.6

120W / 162W

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

90.8%

Zen 5 X3D

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.5

120W / 230W

Ryzen 9 9700X / 105W TDP

90.6% / 90.5%

Zen 5

8 /16

3.8 / 5.5

65W / 88W

Core i7-14700K

90.1%

Raptor Lake Refresh

20 / 28 (8+12)

3.4 / 5.6

125W / 253W

Ryzen 5 9600X / 105W TDP

89% / 88.9%

Zen 5

6 / 12

3.9 / 5.4

65W / 88W

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

87.6%

Zen 5 X3D

8 / 16

4.7 / 5.2

120W / 162W

Core Ultra 5 225

87.3%

Arrow Lake

10 / 10 (6+4)

3.3 / 4.9

65W / 121W

Core i7-13700K

86.7%

Raptor Lake

16 / 24 (8+8)

3.4 / 5.4

125W / 253W

Core i5-14600K

85.8%

Raptor Lake Refresh

14 / 20 (6+8)

3.5 / 5.3

125W / 181W

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

85.4%

Zen 4 X3D

16 / 32

4.2 / 5.7

120W / 162W

Ryzen 9 7950X

85.2%

Zen 4

16 / 32

4.5 / 5.7

170W / 230W

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

84%

Zen 4 X3D

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.6

120W / 162W

Ryzen 7 7700X

84%

Zen 4

8 / 16

4.5 / 5.4

105W / 142W

Core i5-13600K

82.4%

Raptor Lake

14 / 20 (6+8)

3.5 / 5.1

125W / 181W

Core i7-12700K

79.7%

Alder Lake

12 / 20 (8+4)

3.6 / 5

125W / 190W

Core i5-12600K

78.6%

Alder Lake

10 / 16 (6+4)

3.7 / 4.9

125W / 150W

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

77.3%

Zen 4 X3D

8 / 16

4.2 / 5

120W / 162W

Core i5-14400

75.4%

Raptor Lake

10 / 16 (6+4)

2.5 / 4.7

65W / 154W

Ryzen 5 7600X3D

73.2%

Zen 4 X3D

6 / 12

4.1 / 4.7

65W / 88W

Ryzen 5 7600X

71.5%

Zen 4

6 / 12

4.7 / 5.3

105W / 142W

We run hundreds of tests for each CPU, but only a small subset of those tests factor into our single-threaded rankings. We use the mp3 encoder LAME with a single thread (both standard and extended), Cinebench 2026 and 2024’s single-threaded test, the ray-traced renderer POV-ray, and WebXRT4, which runs a series of browser-based applications written in various languages.

The fastest chip in the pool here is the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, which scores 100%, with every other chip scored relative to it. The Core i9-14900K offers 95.4% of the single-threaded performance of the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus, the Ryzen 5 9600X offers 89% of the performance, and so on.

Most real-world workloads aren’t strictly single-threaded, which is why we include it on a subset of the total tests we run. The goal is to see what relative performance looks like in lightly-threaded applications, as well as look into the overall architecture of different CPUs. Single-threaded performance exposes a lot about the architecture in a way that heavily-threaded applications tend to mask.

We’re, of course, looking at performance on a single core, favoring high clock speeds and IPC (instructions per cycle). However, single-threaded performance also says a lot about what’s going on elsewhere inside the CPU, from the speed of the IMC (integrated memory controller) to the fabric/ring speed. That’s why we see things like the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus outperforming the Core Ultra 9 285K, despite the latter sporting higher clock speeds.

Multi-Threaded CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026

Swipe to scroll horizontally
2026 Multi-Threaded CPU Benchmarks
Row 0 - Cell 0

Single-Threaded App Score

Architecture

Cores/Threads (P+E)

Base/Boost Clock (GHz)

TDP / Maximum Power

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

100%

Zen 5 X3D

16 / 32

4.3 / 5.7

170W / 230W

Ryzen 9 9950X

96.8%

Zen 5

16 / 32

4.7 / 5/7

170W / 230W

Core Ultra 7 270K Plus

95.6%

Arrow Lake Refresh

24 / 24 (8+16)

3.7 / 5.5

125W / 250W

Core Ultra 9 285K

88.7%

Arrow Lake

24 / 24 (8+16)

3.7 / 5.7

125W / 250W

Ryzen 9 7950X

88%

Zen 4

16 / 32

4.5 / 5.7

170W / 230W

Ryzen 9 7950X3D

84.4%

Zen 4 X3D

16 / 32

4.2 / 5.7

120W / 162W

Core i9-14900K

83.9%

Raptor Lake Refresh

24 / 32 (8+16)

3.2 / 6

125W / 253W

Core i9-13900K

81%

Raptor Lake

24 / 32 (8+16)

3 / 5.8

125W / 253W

Core Ultra 7 265K

78.9%

Arrow Lake

20 / 20 (8+12)

3.9 / 5.5

125W / 250W

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

77%

Zen 5 X3D

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.5

120W / 230W

Ryzen 9 9900X

76.7%

Zen 5

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.6

120W / 162W

Core i7-14700K

75.1%

Raptor Lake Refresh

20 / 28 (8+12)

3.4 / 5.6

125W / 253W

Core Ultra 5 250K Plus

70.9%

Arrow Lake Refresh

18 / 18 (6+12)

4.2 / 5.3

125W / 159W

Core i7-13700K

67.1%

Raptor Lake

16 / 24 (8+8)

3.4 / 5.4

125W / 253W

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

63.9%

Zen 4 X3D

12 / 24

4.4 / 5.6

120W / 162W

Ryzen 7 9850X3D

57%

Zen 5 X3D

8 / 16

4.7 / 5.6

120W / 162W

Ryzen 7 9800X3D

56.9%

Zen 5 X3D

8 / 16

4.7 / 5.2

120W / 162W

Core Ultra 5 245K

55.8%

Arrow Lake

14 / 14 (6+8)

4.2 / 5.2

125W / 159W

Core i5-14600K

53.9%

Raptor Lake Refresh

14 / 20 (6+8)

3.5 / 5.3

125W / 181W

Core i7-12700K

51.9%

Alder Lake

12 / 20 (8+4)

3.6 / 5

125W / 190W

Core i5-13600K

50.3%

Raptor Lake

14 / 20 (6+8)

3.5 / 5.1

125W / 181W

Ryzen 7 9700X / 105W TDP

47.2% / 53.2%

Zen 5

8 /16

3.8 / 5.5

65W / 88W

Ryzen 7 7700X

46.8%

Zen 4

8 / 16

4.5 / 5.4

105W / 142W

Ryzen 7 7800X3D

44.5%

Zen 4 X3D

8 / 16

4.2 / 5

120W / 162W

Ryzen 5 9600X / 105W TDP

39.7% / 41.7%

Zen 5

6 / 12

3.9 / 5.4

65W / 88W

Core i5-12600K

39.5%

Alder Lake

10 / 16 (6+4)

3.7 / 4.9

125W / 150W

Core Ultra 5 225

38.5%

Arrow Lake

10 / 10 (6+4)

3.3 / 4.9

65W / 121W

Ryzen 5 7600X3D

33.1%

Zen 4 X3D

6 / 12

4.1 / 4.7

65W / 88W

Core i5-14400

32.7%

Raptor Lake

10 / 16 (6+4)

2.5 / 4.7

65W / 154W

Ryzen 5 7600X

31.3%

Zen 4

6 / 12

4.7 / 5.3

105W / 142W

Similar to single-threaded rankings, we use a subset of the total tests we run for CPU reviews in ranking multithreaded performance. Cinebench and POV-ray show up here again, this time using as many threads as possible, alongside VRay, four Blender tests, and Handbrake using various codecs. Although most applications will leverage multiple threads these days, we’re specifically looking at applications that will take as many threads as possible to maximize compute.

Compared to single-threaded workloads, heavily-threaded tasks are less concerned with clock speed and put a greater emphasis on interconnects and core-to-core latency. Core count is obviously important, as well, though it’s been somewhat undermined by Intel’s hybrid architectures over the last several generations.

Given that we’re spanning multiple nodes, core count alone isn’t indicative of higher multithreaded performance. Yes, higher core counts within the same generation will usually provide higher multithreaded performance, but a slew of other factors can increase performance, as well, from all-core and uncore frequencies to higher transistor density. Because of the wide swath of factors, you can see much more aggressive scaling with our multithreaded rankings compared to single-threaded rankings.

Integrated GPU Gaming CPU Benchmarks Rankings 2026

Swipe to scroll horizontally
iGPU Performance relative to Ryzen 7 5700G

 

1280x720

1920x1080

Ryzen 7 5700G B550-E

100%

100%

Ryzen 5 5600G

96.3%

96%

Ryzen 7 4750G

92.9%

94.1%

Ryzen 3 5300G

85.8%

87.2%

Ryzen 5 3400G

83.5%

84.1%

Ryzen 3 3200G

77.1%

78.1%

Intel UHD Graphics 750 32 EU (11600K, 11700K)

58.3%

~48.9%

Intel UHD Graphics 730 24 EU (i5-11400)

51.7%

42.9%

Intel UHD Graphics 630 24 EU (10600K)

36.0%

34.4%

Here's our list of gaming performance with integrated graphics on several of the leading APUs available. We've split this into two different price ranges, so be sure to flip through all of the performance charts. For a bit of commentary and analysis of these results, head to our Ryzen 7 5700G, Ryzen 5 5600G, and Ryzen 3 5300G reviews. The most powerful chip gets a 100, and all others are scored relative to it.

How to Benchmark your CPU

It’s important to know how to benchmark your CPU. It gives you a way to compare performance after an overclock or a CPU upgrade, and it allows you to check if you’re getting the full performance out of your system. Maybe a poor CPU cooler mount is limiting your performance, or maybe your BIOS settings aren’t optimal. Using benchmarks to compare your results lets you see where your rig stacks up, not only for leaderboard purposes, but also basic troubleshooting.

The key to benchmarking your CPU is consistency. The only variable that should change is your CPU, be it a new CPU or an overclock/undervolt. Before starting, make sure to close any applications running in the background. That’s not only to net peak performance, but also to avoid any inconsistencies between runs. Background apps can gobble up threads inconsistently, making it difficult to compare your results from run to run.

If you want more consistency, you can optionally run the following command before benchmarking in an elevated command prompt:

Rundll32.exe advapi32.dll,ProcessIdleTasks

This will force Windows to perform the background tasks it normally does when your PC is idle. It’s not essential, but it’s a good sanity check to make sure there’s nothing interfering with your results.

For applications, you want to test the apps you actually use. If you use the Adobe suite, for example, you can download and use PugetBench for free and compare your results with Puget’s database. A lot of apps don’t have these easy-to-use benchmarking tools and databases, so you need to find a proxy. For instance, Procyon Office measures Microsoft Office performance, but a license costs nearly $1,600 per year. PCMark 10 Basic, which is free, measures open-source office applications. Below, we have some of our favorite free benchmarks for comparing CPU performance.

In games, you can take two approaches: manual or automated. Some modern games include built-in benchmarking tools, such as Cyberpunk 2077 and Doom: The Dark Ages, and although they aren’t perfect, they’re easy to run and highly repeatable. The best way to measure CPU gaming performance, however, is manual benchmarking.

That involves finding a scene where you can go over a specific path repeatedly. That could be starting from a specific checkpoint that you can reload or resorting to a manual save where you start from the exact same position. Regardless, it’s important to avoid randomness in your testing. Keep the path consistent — for example, a walking path through a town — and try not to swing the camera around.

For measuring performance in games, you’ll need a performance monitoring tool. There are simple apps like Nvidia’s FrameView, which logs a ton of information but is a little cumbersome to deal with; it exports data to spreadsheets. CapFrameX is a good alternative, which uses the same backend as FrameView (Intel’s PresentMon), but comes with a user-friendly GUI and extra features like the ability to generate charts right in the app.

After you run your benchmarks, you need a comparison point. Databases like Puget are your best resources on that front. If you’re comparing results to reviews, forum threads, or other systems, keep in mind the variables that can influence performance. It’s not a good idea to compare performance with uncontrolled variables unless you have a wide swath of comparison points.

Best CPU Benchmarks You Can Run

  • Cinebench 2026 – Cinebench is the quintessential CPU benchmark, used almost universally in reviews, and it’s completely free to download and use.
  • Geekbench 6 – Geekbench has a number of issues, but it offers a massive database for comparing your system against other similar systems. And it’s free to download and run.
  • Blender – Blender has a benchmarking utility with a GUI that’s free to download, as well as a large database of results.
  • PCMark 10 Basic – The main PCMark 10 benchmark is free to use with the Basic edition, allowing you to test productivity performance with open-source office apps, as well as compare your scores with UL’s database.
  • Handbrake – Handbrake is a powerful, free, and open-source video transcoding tool, and it’s easy to run benchmarks with. Use any video file, make sure your settings are the same, and start a stopwatch to measure the time encoding takes. Lower is better.
  • WebXPRT 5 – WebXPRT runs a variety of web applications directly in your browser, for free, and with a database to compare results to. It takes a while to run, however.
  • JetStream 2 – JetStream is a faster browser-based benchmark, though it doesn’t have a database of results.
  • CPU-Z – CPU-Z isn’t a reliable benchmark for real-world performance, but it includes single- and multithreaded tests, it’s easy to run, and you’ll find results online almost as commonly as Cinebench results.
  • Y-cruncher – This test calculates Pi with digit extraction, and it’s accelerated with SIMD instructions like AVX. You can only run it from a command line, but it’s relatively straightforward.
  • PugetBench – Puget includes benchmarks for the biggest apps in the Adobe suite, as well as DaVinci Resolve. The benchmark itself is free, and Puget maintains a large database. You’ll need a license for the applications it tests, however.

2026 CPU Benchmarks Test System and Configuration

Swipe to scroll horizontally
2026 CPU Benchmarks Hierarchy Test Setup

Intel LGA 1851 (Arrow Lake and Refresh)

Row 0 - Cell 1

Motherboard

ASRock Z890 Taichi

RAM

2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo RGB DDR5-7200

Intel LGA 1700 (Raptor Lake, Alder Lake)

Row 3 - Cell 1

Motherboard

MSI MPG Z790 Carbon Wi-Fi

RAM

2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo RGB DDR5-7200

AMD AM5 (Zen 5, Zen 4)

Row 6 - Cell 1

Motherboard

MSI MPG X870E Carbon Wi-Fi, Gigabyte Aorus X870E Elite X3D ICE

RAM

2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo RGB DDR5-6000

All Systems

Row 9 - Cell 1

Gaming CPU

Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founder’s Edition

Application GPU

Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founder’s Edition

Cooler

Corsair iCue Link H150i RGB

Storage

2TB Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus

PSU

MSI MPG A1000GS, Gigabyte UD1000GM PG5 V2

Other

Arctic MX-4 TIM, Windows 11 Pro, Alamengda open test bench

Jake Roach
Senior Analyst, CPUs

Jake Roach is the Senior CPU Analyst at Tom’s Hardware, writing reviews, news, and features about the latest consumer and workstation processors.

With contributions from
  • abryant
    Archived comments are found here: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-3819348/intel-amd-processor-hierarchy.html
    Reply
  • King_V
    Will the G5xxx Pentiums, as well as the Ryzen-based Athlons, be added?

    Come to think about it, maybe the AM4 versions of the A10 and A12?

    Low end stuff, true, but still interesting I think to see where the new bottom-end CPUs fit relative to some of the older things that were decent performers in their day.
    Reply
  • Yarberger1
    I have an i5-3570. I have previously been told that an upgrade to (for example) an i7-8700K would see a significant improvement and would be well worth the investment. This article seems to say the exact opposite.

    I presently have a 1920x1080 monitor and GTX960 GPU. My system is used for general office applications, surfing and limited gaming (WoW, with an intention to switch to Elite: Dangerous shortly).
    Reply
  • King_V
    My son, at his mother's house, still uses an i5-2320 with a GTX 660Ti. Handles his needs just fine. I'd say with your usage, what you have is more than sufficient.
    Reply
  • Yarberger1
    Would this remain the case if I were to upgrade to a 2560x1440 monitor? (Thanks for the reply)
    Reply
  • King_V
    That I couldn't say - as I'm not familiar with those particular games or how demanding they are.

    Might be more appropriate to start a separate thread though, for that question. That way you're more likely to get people who can address that question than who would see it buried in the midst of this thread about the hierarchy charts.
    Reply
  • urbanman2004
    Would it be advisable to upgrade the GPU on a system running a i7-980X (w/ 16GB RAM) from a GTX 680 (2GB) to a GTX 1070 (8GB)?
    Reply
  • King_V
    That would really be more dependent on your monitor's resolution and refresh rate. Could be the right choice, could be a bit of overkill, depending on the monitor.
    Reply
  • nufelevas
    Here are the prices updates to February 2019.

    The size of the bubbles indicate application performance.

    The labels in red belong to best buys (lower price or higher performance)


    Not all prices and processors on the article are on sale anymore, so I excluded some CPUs.

    Prices source:
    Intel Core i7-8700K $ 400 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B07598VZR8/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
    Intel Core i7-8700 $ 350 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B07598HLB4/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Intel Core i9-7960X $ 930 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B075XRYMDS/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Intel Core i5-8600K $ 260 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0759FKH8K/?tag=pcpapi-20
    AMD Ryzen 5 2600X $ 216 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B07B428V2L/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
    AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $ 310 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B07B428M7F/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
    Intel Core i9-7980XE $ 1.900 https://www.walmart.com/ip/Intel-Core-i9-7980XE-Skylake-X-18-Core-2-6-GHz-LGA-2066-Desktop-Processor-BX80673I97980X/267995409?affp1=Gf2ssvCIn0M5cClvlZxbzAfXxGbjFWVJaxJnUrYVLKY&affilsrc=api&u1=&oid=223073.7200&wmlspartner=8BacdVP0GFs&sourceid=24923187711495984409&affillinktype=14&veh=aff
    Intel Core i9-7900X $ 1.013 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIAA6581U4822&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-ed-Future%20Publishing%20Ltd-_-na-_-na-_-na&cm_sp=&AID=12920453&PID=8900246&SID=tomshardware-thaus:en_US_18_Review_4312
    Intel Core i7-7700K $ 419 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B01MXSI216/ref=olp_f_new?ie=UTF8&f_new=true
    Intel Core i5-8400 $ 200 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0759FGJ3Q/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    AMD Threadripper 2950X $ 930 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B07GFN6CVF/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Intel Core i7-7820X $ 670 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B072NF4BY3/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Intel Core i3-8350K $ 200 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0759FWJDK/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    AMD Ryzen 7 2700 $ 260 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B07B41717Z/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
    AMD Threadripper 1900X $ 310 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0754JNQBP/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
    Intel Core i7-7700 $ 340 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B01N0L41N7/ref=olp_f_new?ie=UTF8&f_new=true
    Threadripper 2990WX $ 1.730 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B07G25SD1P/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $ 165 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B07B41WS48/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Intel Core i7-7800X $ 400 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117793&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-VigLink2-_-na-_-na-_-na&AID=12087162&PID=8167422&SID=js0gcflbe00035wt05278&utm_medium=affiliates&utm_source=afc-VigLink2&cjevent=05fe1ba92e0c11e98283044d0a24060d
    Intel Core i5-7600K $ 280 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B01MRRPPQS/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
    AMD Threadripper 1950X $ 590 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819113447&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-ed-Future%20Publishing%20Ltd-_-na-_-na-_-na&cm_sp=&AID=12920453&PID=8900246&SID=tomshardware-thaus:en_US_18_Review_4312
    AMD Threadripper 1920X $ 450 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B074CBJHCT/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    AMD Ryzen 7 1800X $ 320 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B06W9JXK4G/ref=olp_f_new?ie=UTF8&f_new=true
    Intel Core i5-7600 $ 270 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B01MYTYSMK?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware-thaus:en_US_18_Review_4312-20
    AMD Ryzen 7 1700X $ 190 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B06X3W9NGG/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
    AMD Ryzen 5 1600X $ 160 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B06XKWT7GD/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
    Intel Core i3-8100 $ 119 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0759FTRZL/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Intel Core i5-7500 $ 242 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B01MZZJ1P0/ref=olp_f_new?ie=UTF8&f_new=true
    Intel Core i5-7400 $ 220 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117731&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-ed-Future%20Publishing%20Ltd-_-na-_-na-_-na&cm_sp=&AID=12920453&PID=8900246&SID=tomshardware-thaus:en_US_18_Review_4312
    AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $ 170 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B06WP5YCX6/ref=olp_f_new?ie=UTF8&f_new=true
    AMD Ryzen 5 1500X $ 160 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B06XKVNRSM/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Intel Core i3-7350K $ 200 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117772&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-VigLink2-_-na-_-na-_-na&AID=12087162&PID=8167422&SID=js0h0apiku0035wt05278&utm_medium=affiliates&utm_source=afc-VigLink2&cjevent=9d681f5d2e0e11e9809a04500a240614
    AMD Ryzen 5 2400G $ 150 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B079D8FD28/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Intel Core i3-7300 $ 241 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B01N59LL8R?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware-thaus:en_US_18_Review_4312-20
    Intel Core i3-7100 $ 170 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B01NCESRJX/ref=dp_olp_all_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=all
    AMD Ryzen 5 1400 $ 135 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B06XKWT8J4/ref=olp_f_new?tag=hawk-future-20&ascsubtag=tomshardware-thaus:en_US_18_Review_4312-20&f_new=true
    AMD Ryzen 3 1300X $ 160 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0741DLVL7/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    AMD Ryzen 3 2200G $ 95 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B079D3DBNM/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Intel Pentium G4560 $ 110 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117743&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-VigLink2-_-na-_-na-_-na&AID=12087162&PID=8167422&SID=js0h9q5vas0035wt05278&utm_medium=affiliates&utm_source=afc-VigLink2&cjevent=a399b49e2e0f11e9826d04460a24060f
    AMD Ryzen 3 1200 $ 95 https://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0741DN383/ref=dp_olp_new_mbc?ie=UTF8&condition=new
    Reply
  • drawingpin
    The amazon prices showing for the likes of the Ryzen 2600X are inflated as they're displaying the price for a combo deal with a Corsair AIO. Not very helpful as price is a huge factor and the Ryzen CPUs already come with their own cooler.
    Reply