Intel SSD 540s Review - Our First Look At The SM2258

Intel scored SMI's new SM2258 controller under an exclusive contract and paired it with SK hynix 16nm TLC flash for the new SSD 540s. Intel geared the 540s to attack the low-cost segment, but performance is always a key issue, so let's put it to the test.

Early Verdict

Intel set the bar very low for mainstream SSDs with the SSD 540s, but the market will continue on. This drive delivers less performance per dollar compared to market leaders and fails to compete with offerings from Tier 3 manufacturers. If you want a reliable SSD, this may be the best TLC model outside of Samsung. At the same time, it doesn't give us a reason not to buy a Samsung 850 EVO. We have to wonder what is going on at Intel for the company to delay taking advantage of its new IMFT 3D NAND that is already shipping.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    SSD Optimizer software is very good and includes several nice features

  • +

    Reliability

  • +

    5-year warranty

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Expensive

  • -

    Under performs compared to other mainstream SSD offerings with lower prices

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Specifications And Features

Two years ago, we learned that Intel started working with Taiwanese fabless semiconductor manufacturer Silicon Motion, Inc. (SMI). The scrappy SMI enchanted SSD manufacturers in 2014 with its high-performance, low-cost, four-channel flash processors, which helped move us out of the SandForce era. SMI has had several design wins with prominent SSD giants such as Crucial and SanDisk, and the Intel SSD 540s represents another big achievement for the company. The SMI controller powers the Intel 540s up to 78,000/85,000 random read/write IOPS, which is a perfect example of why the controllers have become so popular.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Chris Ramseyer
Contributor

Chris Ramseyer was a senior contributing editor for Tom's Hardware. He tested and reviewed consumer storage.

  • joz
    Was the OCZ Trion 150 and Mushkin Reactor always that good? While they aren't the Evo, they seem to be performing quite well.
    Reply
  • boller
    Guys, you've misread "native TLC transfer performance" as being 135MB/s. In fact it's even worse - about 125 MB/s (from eyeballing the graph).
    135MB/s is average speed which includes SLC bump in it's calculation.
    But it does not change the conclusion, of course: this drive is POS.
    Reply
  • anonymousdude
    Pricing on amazon is high, well at least it is if you live near a microcenter. If you order from microcenter the 480gb is priced at $120, which is $10 more than the trion 150 which $110 at microcenter and is $120 on amazon. I'd say that at it's a fair price considering Intel's reputation for reliability and well Intel's branding. For reference the 850 evo is $158 on amazon and $150 at microcenter. Not saying that it's a good drive, but to an average person price and reliability are going to matter more than the fact that it slightly slower than some other drives.
    Reply
  • dreamer2908
    18452087 said:
    Was the OCZ Trion 150 and Mushkin Reactor always that good? While they aren't the Evo, they seem to be performing quite well.

    Well, Mushkin Reactor uses the same controller (SM2246EN) and NAND (Micron 16nm MLC) as Crucial BX100 does.
    The discontinued BX100 performed quite well, so the Reactor should also do.
    Reply
  • Zaxx420
    "it doesn't give us a reason not to buy a Samsung 850 EVO."

    Bet you have a keyboard macro just for that phrase...lol
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    Sometimes I feel like I need a macro.
    Reply
  • Cyberats
    Wow, Mushkin Reactor is my surprise in this survey, stable on all fronts where even Samsung Evo is wavering and it's a full 512gb of space or is it a typo ?
    Reply
  • Zaxx420
    I'm wondering if the Reactor price quote is a typo...$245 at Amazon...ouch!
    Reply
  • littleleo
    I would have liked to see the SK Hynix model in the mix the price on those is good and the performance according to my customers is also very good. The specs look better then the Samsung's on the read and worse on the write; I just wish they offered a 1TB version.
    Reply
  • mapesdhs
    C.R., I thought toms was going to stop using graphs with non-zero origins? The sequential read and notebook battery life graphs are visually misleading. There's no point using a graph if its visual appearance does not convey data difference.
    Reply