Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Foxconn Denies Reports of Worker Strike

By - Source: China Labor Watch | B 7 comments

Foxconn denies reports of a worker strike at one of its factories.

Foxconn this past weekend denied reports that workers at one of its Chinese factories have gone on strike. China Labor Watch, a U.S.-based non-profit reported this on Friday that a strike occurred at Foxconn’s Zhengzhou factory that, according to workers, involved three to four thousand production employees. 

On Saturday, China Labor Watch reported that the strike was due to the fact that October 1 to October 8 is a national holiday in China. The non-profit says that the majority of staff taking part in the strike were from the onsite quality control (OQC) line. The story goes that Foxconn required workers in the Zhengzhou factory to work during this holiday period in order to meet production demands for the the iPhone 5. Additionally, CLW says Foxconn raised "overly strict demands" on product quality without providing worker training for the corresponding skills. These events led to workers from the OQC line left the factory on October 5.

China Labor Watch claims that Foxconn denied these workers were on strike but the non-profit cites staff that say the employees went on strike instead of volunteering to work overtime. Foxconn said yesterday in a statement sent to CNet that reports of a strike are inaccurate.

"Any reports that there has been an employee strike are inaccurate, there has been no workplace stoppage in that facility or any other Foxconn facility and production has continued on schedule," the company said in a statement.

Foxconn's statement did confirm two disputes between 'a small group' of production line workers and Quality Assurance personnel at the Zhengzhou plant but says these were isolated incidents that took place on October 1 and 2. The company said it immediately addressed the issues raised by the staff involved. That aside, the company said anyone working over the holiday did so voluntarily and was paid three times their hourly rate, as per Chinese labor laws.

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback           

Display 7 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 17 Hide
    dalethepcman , October 8, 2012 9:12 PM
    Quote:
    The company said it immediately addressed the issues raised by the staff involved.


    Maybe they ran them over with tanks to keep them quiet.....

    It wouldn't be the first time.
  • 10 Hide
    Antimatter79 , October 8, 2012 9:12 PM
    A 7 day long holiday? (Holiweek)
Other Comments
  • 10 Hide
    Antimatter79 , October 8, 2012 9:12 PM
    A 7 day long holiday? (Holiweek)
  • 17 Hide
    dalethepcman , October 8, 2012 9:12 PM
    Quote:
    The company said it immediately addressed the issues raised by the staff involved.


    Maybe they ran them over with tanks to keep them quiet.....

    It wouldn't be the first time.
  • 3 Hide
    A Bad Day , October 8, 2012 10:13 PM
    dalethepcmanMaybe they ran them over with tanks to keep them quiet.....It wouldn't be the first time.


    Tanks are too expensive. Just "disappear" some of their payroll documents to deny them of their wages to teach them a lesson.
  • 5 Hide
    frombehind , October 8, 2012 11:30 PM
    And so the truth comes out... its not REALLY Apple that's putting sub-par components into their phones... Its disgruntled workers in china that are assembling them wrong out of spite. Thats why all the damn iPhones have weird issues!

    hell, if that was me... you better believe there would be a mushroom-stamp on EVERY single phone i assemble, front and back!!! =D

    Shame on you Apple AND Foxcon both for treating people this way!
  • -2 Hide
    garrick , October 9, 2012 4:46 AM
    If there is no strike at Foxconn why is there such a long delay for those who ordered the iphone in September?
  • 0 Hide
    alyoshka , October 9, 2012 10:04 AM
    What can we say about "Denial being the first sign of........"
  • 1 Hide
    Andy Chow , October 9, 2012 10:25 PM
    "the employees went on strike instead of volunteering to work overtime"

    If you're not allowed to refuse, how is that "volunteer"?