Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Opinion: The Upside If Qualcomm Decided to Buy AMD

By - Source: Tom's Hardware US | B 50 comments

The rumor mill churns on.

It seems the acquisition rumors of Qualcomm having a significant interest in AMD are calming down again, just like previous rumors of Dell wanting to buy AMD have vanished as well. But what if … Qualcomm acquired AMD? Good or bad?

In the end, the Qualcomm rumor may not be so silly. There is considerable benefit for the ARM processor maker to acquire AMD, or at least, gain more access to AMD's assets. Unfortunately, AMD is put down as the eternal second in processor race behind Intel, and AMD is believed to have considerably less value today than it did a few years ago when it put the Opteron processor in play. There is also the perception that AMD has great hardware designers who are disconnected from the company's marketing and manufacturing. Lately, AMD products have looked much better on paper and leaked roadmaps than they did in products we can buy.

Strangely enough, there is value that goes well beyond perception and beyond AMD's current market cap of about $3 billion. From a business side, AMD owns 10,525 approved patents with the U.S. patent and trademark office. AMD owns a sizable share of TSMC's 28 nm production capacity that Qualcomm so desperately needs. AMD owns graphics IP and know-how - and even if Qualcomm already owns AMD's former Imageon technology (called Adreno today), there is little doubt that Qualcomm could use more of AMD's know-how when competing with Nvidia. Imagine the implications: AMD's former CTO, Eric Demers, who was recently hired by Qualcomm, could have an interesting meet-up with AMD's leadership again.

The there is AMD's foot in the server market, which has been hurt by Intel's Xeons lately, but is nevertheless stronger than what Qualcomm has. Given the necessity for ARM to gain credibility in the server market, AMD is about as good as it gets. There is no other server processor maker that is as affordable as AMD and provides an equivalent value. As far as finances are concerned, AMD could be considered pocket change. Even if Qualcomm paid $5 billion for AMD, it could cover the cost from its reserves, which stand at about $13.3 billion in cash and marketable securities ($3.4 billion in cash alone).

For AMD, the deal may not be so bad as well. Under the umbrella of consolidation, and AMD's stronger focus on processors that appeal to the biggest chunks in the consumer market, and less on competing with Intel for the fastest processors, makes Qualcomm's consumer electronics products a good fit. Perhaps there is even some cash left to reinvigorate AMD's x86 business (Qualcomm posted a $4.26 billion profit in 2011). If Windows RT grows into a major business, both Qualcomm and AMD can win from shared resources and compete much better with Intel as well as a strengthening Nvidia.

If Qualcomm acquires AMD, it may be painful for the enthusiast and could be a death sentence for the AMD brand in the long-term, but engineering and competitiveness could benefit on both sides tremendously.

 

Contact Us for News Tips, Corrections and Feedback

Discuss
Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the News comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 20 Hide
    dark_knight33 , August 27, 2012 7:48 AM
    If Qualcomm were to buy AMD, that would likely lead to a virtual monopoly in the x86 consumer segment. I imagine another company would simply end competition on AMD's weaker business ventures, and keep pumping resources into the more profitable GPU & Enterprise (server) markets.

    Not really a good thing IMO. I believe AMD has the talent and know how to become competitive again. However, a lack of good leadership, and as was pointed out, a disconnect between marketing & engineering is really holding them back.
  • 13 Hide
    bawchicawawa , August 27, 2012 7:39 AM
    Qualcom, buy AMD and pump a lot of money into, please.
  • 11 Hide
    schmich , August 27, 2012 11:04 AM
    I rather Samsung buys AMD. They're investing heavily in their foundries. Their ARM SOCs are awesome and they make great products.

    rnssr71If ANYONE buys AMD or if AMD goes bankrupt, the x86 license goes back to Intel. Anyone who buys AMD would know longer be able to produce an x86 cpu. ......Unless IBM buys them- IBM has an x86 license that they don't use.

    VIA has a license as well. In any case, Intel would be forced to license x86 if anything happens to AMD (due to the monopoly).
Other Comments
    Display all 50 comments.
  • -5 Hide
    jabarumba , August 27, 2012 7:30 AM
    QCOM buys AMD, then Intel buys Nvidia...
  • 13 Hide
    bawchicawawa , August 27, 2012 7:39 AM
    Qualcom, buy AMD and pump a lot of money into, please.
  • -3 Hide
    ekho , August 27, 2012 7:42 AM
    DABDA:
    Denial, Anger, Bargaining, Depression, ACCEPTANCE!

    For this I'm still on Denial, Too bad IMO. Does AMD completely admitted the defeat?


  • 1 Hide
    alidan , August 27, 2012 7:45 AM
    killabanksintel doesnt need nvidia they can probably make a better gpu if they really wanted to


    they tried and failed, they had one that was somewhat equal to the 285 at one point (rumor) but scratched that whole line without going to market.

    it takes a hell of allot to get a working and effective gpu architecture working, intel tried, and failed.
  • 20 Hide
    dark_knight33 , August 27, 2012 7:48 AM
    If Qualcomm were to buy AMD, that would likely lead to a virtual monopoly in the x86 consumer segment. I imagine another company would simply end competition on AMD's weaker business ventures, and keep pumping resources into the more profitable GPU & Enterprise (server) markets.

    Not really a good thing IMO. I believe AMD has the talent and know how to become competitive again. However, a lack of good leadership, and as was pointed out, a disconnect between marketing & engineering is really holding them back.
  • -6 Hide
    greghome , August 27, 2012 8:04 AM
    alidanthey tried and failed, they had one that was somewhat equal to the 285 at one point (rumor) but scratched that whole line without going to market.it takes a hell of allot to get a working and effective gpu architecture working, intel tried, and failed.



    After seeing what the latest Intel HDs can do.......I don't think they've done trying and frankly, they haven't failed, just progressing a little slow
  • -5 Hide
    kcorp2003 , August 27, 2012 8:15 AM
    alidanthey tried and failed, they had one that was somewhat equal to the 285 at one point (rumor) but scratched that whole line without going to market.it takes a hell of allot to get a working and effective gpu architecture working, intel tried, and failed.


    They haven't failed. The project got integrated into the CPU. After all Larrabee is GPGPU, so the technology was all too different from the discrete GPU.
  • -4 Hide
    master_chen , August 27, 2012 8:29 AM
    kcorp2003Imagine the monopoly control.

    There are still VIA, Sun, ARM and...Nvidia (which would begin it's desktop CPU march quite soon, it's inevitable), out there...plenty of capable competitors, IMHO.
  • 7 Hide
    tomfreak , August 27, 2012 9:47 AM
    All I need is to see ARM gets into Desktop chips to end x86 dominance, or may be Android for desktop so I can finally stop paying Microsoft.
  • 3 Hide
    idroid , August 27, 2012 10:11 AM
    I have a mixed feeling about this.... if Qualcomm buys AMD i am sure it will definitely improve but idk...it will be weird... Intel VS Qualcomm and Nvidia VS Qualcomm wouldn't be the same :(  well, i am all for improvements!
  • 2 Hide
    olaf , August 27, 2012 10:33 AM
    jabarumbaQCOM buys AMD, then Intel buys Nvidia...


    this would imply that Nvidia, wanted to be bought, also Nvidia is doing rely well so to buy it, would require the money of several 3rd world country's together. Committing to to something that big would hinder Intel's investment into further upgrading there factory's also things that are not cheap. Note Samsung's recent investment of over 4billion (about Arm's yearly profit) into modernizing one of its Fab's to get to 28nm. Intel has so far the best fab capacity in the world both in yield and and in miniaturization size, being well ahead of its competition, advantage that is hard to gain easily lost.
  • -5 Hide
    Blessedman , August 27, 2012 10:36 AM
    Just out of curiosity how much do you think it would take to buy intel? say apple decided it wanted everything in house. Could they afford Intel? $40billion? or closer to $100billion?
  • 4 Hide
    sonofliberty08 , August 27, 2012 10:46 AM
    what if VIA buy AMD ?
  • 10 Hide
    rnssr71 , August 27, 2012 10:48 AM
    If ANYONE buys AMD or if AMD goes bankrupt, the x86 license goes back to Intel. Anyone who buys AMD would know longer be able to produce an x86 cpu. ......Unless IBM buys them- IBM has an x86 license that they don't use.
  • 0 Hide
    mmstick , August 27, 2012 10:50 AM
    TomfreakAll I need is to see ARM gets into Desktop chips to end x86 dominance, or may be Android for desktop so I can finally stop paying Microsoft.

    Have you ever heard of Ubuntu?
  • 0 Hide
    master_chen , August 27, 2012 10:50 AM
    BlessedmanJust out of curiosity how much do you think it would take to buy intel? say apple decided it wanted everything in house. Could they afford Intel? $40billion? or closer to $100billion?

    You actually can't buy 51% (Control packet) of Intel's share even if you pay 500~800 Billions. It's revenue just that high. To actually buy Intel, you'd need at least twice that sum.
Display more comments