Diablo III Performance, Benchmarked

Minimum Detail Benchmarks

In the following minimum-detail benchmarks, we turned every setting down as low as it'd go except for texture quality, which we left at high.

The only card that struggles at 1280x1024 is the GeForce 210 DDR3. AMD's Radeon HD 6450 manages to keep its minimum frame rate above 30. All of the other cards push minimum frame rates above 60.

At 1680x1050, the Radeon HD 6450 drops below a 30 FPS minimum. But in an isometric RPG like Diablo III, that's still quite playable. The rest of the cards manage to maintain minimum frame rates above 40 FPS, indicating an excellent level of performance.

At 1080p, the Radeon HD 6540 might be considered playable, but it'll undoubtedly run into trouble in more demanding situations. As for the rest of the cards, minimum frame rates are around 40 FPS or better, suggesting a playable experience.

Clearly, Diablo III doesn’t require a beefy system in order to push its minimum detail levels (though you'll want a Radeon HD 6450, at least, to play at 1680x1050).

Create a new thread in the US Reviews comments forum about this subject
This thread is closed for comments
169 comments
    Your comment
    Top Comments
  • Formata
    Oh yes... The epic armageddon of all click-fest's is upon us! In 6 months time I'll bench 100kg with my index finger.
    35
  • Murissokah
    So the CPU won't keep us from enjoying the game... nor the GPU... only the calendar then.
    29
  • trace_87
    "Like the originals, the isometric view remains locked in place, and zooming in is not an option."

    Push Z
    24
  • Other Comments
  • dodger_nzl
    Nice to see my GF460 should play it at max settings.
    12
  • Formata
    Oh yes... The epic armageddon of all click-fest's is upon us! In 6 months time I'll bench 100kg with my index finger.
    35
  • Murissokah
    So the CPU won't keep us from enjoying the game... nor the GPU... only the calendar then.
    29
  • sharpiedpanda
    The calendar and your finger stamina :p
    22
  • JoeMomma
    i'm luvin it!
    -4
  • trace_87
    "Like the originals, the isometric view remains locked in place, and zooming in is not an option."

    Push Z
    24
  • cinergy
    HD7870 is on par with GTX580! Now I understand why he didn't even take HD7970 into test. That would have been too embarrassing for nvidia.
    -20
  • borden5
    Note that amd 12.4 artifacts doesn't only apply for Diablo 3 alone I got artifact in any game with my 3650 so I have to revert to 12.3
    11
  • Anonymous
    so can anyone recommend a good laptop that can play this no lag for under 800?
    6
  • Darkerson
    I had a lot of fun with it in the beta. I still cant say Im going to be a fan of the RMT Auction House, but other then that, its a fun game. Between this and Guild Wars 2, Im gonna have a very unproductive summer :D
    6
  • Zero_
    I would have liked to see a HD7750 in there, as that would be the easiest upgrade for someone who wanted a cheap card with low power draw. It's a bit hard to predict where it'll end up because the HD6850/HD6770 anomaly.
    13
  • geotek
    Were any large fights present in the FPS recording? Because of the computers ive tested ive noticed computers with slower CPUs, especially dual cores, would get quite choppy during large fights and all the ragdolls flying everywhere. This problem seemed to either vanish or greatly diminish when physics were changed from high to low. Perhaps the physics are handled by the cpu? If so, this means the cpu testing results may not be a good measure of real world use of the game.
    17
  • rantoc
    cinergyHD7870 is on par with GTX580! Now I understand why he didn't even take HD7970 into test. That would have been too embarrassing for nvidia.


    Hardly, Nvidia is the only party that provides extra gfx quality via ambient occlusion for this title and with all thoose monster cards available today i rather use that extra power to get better quality than let it go wasted. So even if i dont get 500+ fps in 2560x1600 with 2x680 sli i do get ambient occlusion as well as insanly good AA making the title look nice. I play the game to enjoy it, not benchmark it!
    8
  • Anonymous
    I still use a 9600GT, anyone have any idea how it would work with that?
    5
  • whysobluepandabear
    "At 1080p, the Radeon HD 6540 might be considered playable,"

    Don't you mean the 6450?
    16
  • blazorthon
    gnookergiI still use a 9600GT, anyone have any idea how it would work with that?


    Not well, if it works at all (which I doubt).
    -10
  • blazorthon
    courtlandbso can anyone recommend a good laptop that can play this no lag for under 800?


    A laptop with an A6 or A8 and a 7470 in CF or something similar should do it very well. I know that HP sells those for under $650 and depending on whether or not it's on sale, even cheaper. You could probably get something similar even cheaper elsewhere (HP isn't known for being the cheapest, not even among other OEMs).
    3
  • trace_87
    This article will need another go once the game comes out. You have to have something a bit more taxing than this.
    7
  • Gman450
    I've got a GTS450. Maybe I should be looking somewhere between the HD 6670 and GTX 550Ti..
    5
  • Gman450
    gnookergiI still use a 9600GT, anyone have any idea how it would work with that?

    Well you can perhaps look somewhere around the GT440 or the HD 6670 but don't expect the same FPS.
    4