- Email |
- Print |
- Comment (1) |
- Share

Windows XP's Device Manager shows two CPUs.
The evolutionary process has been underway for nearly two years (692 days, to be exact). The first Intel Pentium 4 based on the Willamette core appeared in November 2000. When it was first introduced, it actually ran slower than its predecessor, the Pentium III. Intel initially received a lot of criticism for the P4 with its Netburst architecture, as the high clock speed 1.5 GHz P4 achieved nowhere near the kind of performance that was available from the AMD Athlon 1333. For a long time, it seemed that Intel had saddled itself with the wrong architecture. The P4 simply was unable to keep up with the AMD Athlon in any benchmark tests. Not only that, but against the reasonably priced Athlon, the P4 looked expensive. To make matters worse, the P4 platform had to be used with the outrageously expensive Rambus memory. The situation escalated when the Athlon 1400 was introduced, offering superior performance to the 1700 MHz P4.
The introduction of chipsets with support for DDR marked a turning point for the mass-market's acceptance of the P4. Intel began to leave the AMD Athlon behind in the gigahertz stakes, as it stepped the numbers up even further. Nevertheless, the Athlon still performed well in benchmark tests, at times even edging ahead of its rival. As the AMD Athlon was based on a design that was now over four years old, it became difficult to integrate new technology into the processor. The final stage in its development - the Barton core and larger cache - is currently waiting in the wings. For the time being, however, AMD has lost the race to produce the fastest processor. Intel has already broken the 3 GHz barrier and has introduced new features such as Hyper-Threading and clock-throttling (PROCHOT). It must be said, however, that even Intel developers are highly respectful of the AMD Hammer, which is expected to make its debut at Cebit in March 2003. But the Hammer has now lost the time advantage that AMD had originally envisaged. (The launch was originally planned for 2001.)

Intel Pentium 4 at 3.06 GHz - Hyper-Threading means that certain operating systems (Windows 2000, XP) recognize it as a dual processor system.
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- 9950 AMD Overclocked it not what you think
- Collection of Conroe Data. (Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme!)
- AM2 3800+ OC
- Need help choosing psu
- Trouble w/ Intel 3.73GHz Pentium Extreme Dual Core 965 CPU
- FSB/DRAM ratio help pleaseee
- Guide to overclocking the A64
- CRITICAL CHOICE: Buy Xigmatek, OCZ... or keep Infinity
- Cheap AM2 Overclocking motherboard?
- E6600,P5BDlx,8800gts overclocking experience.
- MEMORY FAQ (please read before posting)
- ASUS P5E3 Deluxe Motherboard - Quadro FX card won't work in 1st slot.
- MSI 865PE Neo2-P Platinum Edt. Related Questions
- 1GB Dual Channel vs. 2GB Single Channel? Which is better?
Related news
- ECS goes dual platform with single-board Intel/AMD solution
- Microsoft: A single license for a dual-core processor
- ATI's Xpress 200 chipset targets dual and single-core Pentiums
- Dual-core IBM PowerPC 'to ship in single-core form'
- Entry level dual-core Opterons to be priced same as high-end single-cores
Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $185.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $974.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $174.99 TigerDirect More info |
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
crazy :
Ragdoll Physics 2
No real goal, just to have fun. If you're feeling a little down, play this game. I won't say more, find out for yourself.
|





