Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Windows 8: Double-Checking Performance On Core i7-3770K

Windows 8: Double-Checking Performance On Core i7-3770K
By , Achim Roos

After giving Windows 8 our attention last week, we're following up with one more look at performance using a Core i7-3770K processor. Are there any aberrations to note, or does Intel's Ivy Bridge architecture demonstrate the same behavior as Bulldozer?

Last week was dominated by coverage of Microsoft's Windows 8.

There will be more Windows 8-oriented coverage coming, of course. But we wanted to wrap the week up with one last look at system performance using a Core i7-3770K-based platform, adding a couple of synthetic tests not purposely bound by processor performance. 

So, do we see the same outcome from Core i7-3770K as what we realized from the FX-8150? We'll start with a look at our test platform, and go from there.

Benchmark System
Hardware
Motherboard (LGA 1155)Asus P8Z77-V Pro, Chipset: Intel Z77 Express, BIOS: 1504
CPUIntel Core i7-3770K (22 nm, Ivy Bridge, D2), 4C/8T, 3.5 GHz, 4 x 256 KB L2 Cache, 8 MB Shared L3 Cache, w/ HD Graphics 4000, 77 W TDP, 3.9 GHz max. Turbo
Memory2 x 8 GB DDR3-1600, Corsair Vengeance CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10
Graphics CardSapphire Radeon HD 7870 FleX, GPU: Pitcairn (1000 MHz), Graphics RAM: 2048 MB GDDR5 (1200 MHz), Stream Processors: 1280
System DriveSamsung PM810, 256 GB, SATA 3Gb/s, MZ5PA256HMDR
Power Supply UnitPC Power & Cooling, Silencer 750EPS12V 750 W
Operating Systems
Operating System IWindows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
Operating System IIWindows 8 Pro x64 RTM
Drivers
AMD Radeon Driver
AMD Catalyst 12.8 Suite for Windows 7
AMD Radeon Driver
AMD Catalyst 12.8 Suite for Windows 8
Intel Chipset DriverChipset Installation Utility Version 9.​3.​0.​1019


Benchmark System

Pictured below is the complete configuration we used for testing, including an Ivy Bridge-based Core i7-3770K, an SSD, 16 GB of DDR3-1600 memory, and Sapphire’s Radeon HD 7870 FleX graphics card.

Sapphire's Radeon HD 7870 FleX has a custom cooling solution with two fans. It does particularly well in OpenCL-based workloads, where AMD’s Graphics Core Next (GCN) architecture does well.

Display 44 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 25 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , November 6, 2012 3:35 AM
    You are using winrar 3.98 , which isnt big on multithreading. Winrar4.2 is a huge change from the older versions, with quite aggressive multithreading. Please drop the old version and use the newer. :) 
  • 18 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , November 6, 2012 3:38 AM
    most of these benchmarks are basically CPU bound. Can you do a mix test that does CPU + IO activity , like an Antivirus software ? or uncompressing 10GB+ rar/7z archives ?
    That would test if Microsoft has made changes in the scheduler to balance throughput VS response time.
Other Comments
  • 25 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , November 6, 2012 3:35 AM
    You are using winrar 3.98 , which isnt big on multithreading. Winrar4.2 is a huge change from the older versions, with quite aggressive multithreading. Please drop the old version and use the newer. :) 
  • 18 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , November 6, 2012 3:38 AM
    most of these benchmarks are basically CPU bound. Can you do a mix test that does CPU + IO activity , like an Antivirus software ? or uncompressing 10GB+ rar/7z archives ?
    That would test if Microsoft has made changes in the scheduler to balance throughput VS response time.
  • 7 Hide
    Darkerson , November 6, 2012 3:53 AM
    Well, at least things are on an overall even scale, unlike when vista came out and was decidely less snappy than XP. But with all the other modifications MS has made, such as the nice boost to start up and shut down speeds, its still "feels" faster than 7, even if it really isnt, overall. At any rate, I still dont feel this is "Vista 2" as a lot of people were making it out to be before launch.
  • 0 Hide
    SteelCity1981 , November 6, 2012 4:26 AM
    Overall Windows 8 doesn't improve over Windows 7 as both OSes are evenly matched and trade off performance over each other in diff benchmarks and you would think a newer OS like Windows 8 that is suppose to use less resources then Windows 7 should have outperformed Windows 7 across the board and yet it doesn't.
  • 9 Hide
    agnickolov , November 6, 2012 5:40 AM
    Alas, you skipped the Visual Studio benchmark. It showed slight aberration in Win7's favor on the AMD platform, so I was curious if that remained true for Intel as well.
  • 4 Hide
    manwell999 , November 6, 2012 7:40 AM
    Why bother doing performance comparisons if whenever the performance drops for the new version out comes the excuse "it will be fixed in the driver". What evidence is their to say this?

    A double-check means check-check, not check-excuse. Conclusions are drawn from the data at hand, not from speculation on what might be in the future.

    Otherwise cite the manufacturers acknowledgment that performance issues are going to be fixed and hold them to it.
  • -2 Hide
    darkstar845 , November 6, 2012 9:24 AM
    Is there a way to customize windows 8 to make it look like the desktop picture in the first page?
  • 5 Hide
    warmon6 , November 6, 2012 9:51 AM
    darkstar845Is there a way to customize windows 8 to make it look like the desktop picture in the first page?


    no. those are 2 different images (windows 7 and 8) that's been fused together.

    now, if you want that start button on windows 8, you could look at this article and try one of the 2 solutions they give.

    http://www.pcworld.com/article/2012810/another-way-to-restore-the-windows-8-start-button-and-menu.html
  • 3 Hide
    roflmaonow , November 6, 2012 10:22 AM
    warmon6no. those are 2 different images (windows 7 and 8) that's been fused together.now, if you want that start button on windows 8, you could look at this article and try one of the 2 solutions they give.http://www.pcworld.com/article/201 [...] -menu.html


    I just tried out pokki, it's really good for free program. Thanks for the heads up. I do like Start8 more though.
  • 7 Hide
    zyky , November 6, 2012 11:37 AM
    When did everyone forget how to make proper graphs. Can we get everything in the same sort order instead of sticking the winner on top each time? It's much harder to compare at a glance how it is now.
  • 4 Hide
    RazorBurn , November 6, 2012 11:41 AM
    The Two features of windows 8 that persuaded me to upgrade are

    1. Storage Spaces
    2. Data Deduplication

    jeffwouters.nl/index.php/2012/01/disk-deduplication-in-windows-8-explained-from-a-to-z/
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/filecab/archive/2012/05/21/introduction-to-data-deduplication-in-windows-server-2012.aspx

    Hope tom's will have a in depth look at Data Deduplication..
  • 2 Hide
    warmon6 , November 6, 2012 11:59 AM
    roflmaonowI just tried out pokki, it's really good for free program. Thanks for the heads up. I do like Start8 more though.


    Np, while i haven't cared if there a start button or not (been trying it out since the dev preview which did have it), I know other people have cared.

    I'm just showing options to those that want it back.
  • -9 Hide
    SteelCity1981 , November 6, 2012 12:23 PM
    TheCapuletLol, what?


    i'm sorry if that was over your head.
  • 8 Hide
    nekromobo , November 6, 2012 3:16 PM
    What about double checking battery life on laptops for both win7/8 and AMD/Intel camps?

    Kinda would think that win8 be way better in reserving battery?
  • 3 Hide
    maxinexus , November 6, 2012 3:16 PM
    Where is the comparison of PC boot, resume, or shut down times?
  • 0 Hide
    neiroatopelcc , November 6, 2012 3:20 PM
    Please compare windows server 2012 as well. You'll need to install the Wireless feature and enable the windows audio service, then it's like windows 8, but with desktop as default ui :) 
    maybe consider desktop experience feature too if those things are needed
  • 0 Hide
    clonazepam , November 6, 2012 5:35 PM
    I hadn't seen this Fritz benchmark before. I just tried version 4.2. I'm using an i7-2600k at 4.6ghz, with 16GB RAM at 1866. Let's just say my results are less than half of what you got on the i7-3770k so I think I'm missing something. Maybe I have too much overhead in processes, etc, or something...

    Edit: I closed about 40 processes, funny Chrome had 12 processes running taking over 2GB memory in total. Still, I managed to only get a score of 6006 lol...
  • 3 Hide
    PreferLinux , November 6, 2012 8:20 PM
    zykyWhen did everyone forget how to make proper graphs. Can we get everything in the same sort order instead of sticking the winner on top each time? It's much harder to compare at a glance how it is now.

    Worse, some graphs are in a particular (or is it random?) order, and some graphs have the winner on top. It is totally disgusting.
  • 0 Hide
    clonazepam , November 6, 2012 8:28 PM
    I believe it draws more attention to the graph's results. Read through an entire newspaper. Recall what you remember the next day, and most likely, it'll be discrepancies, typos, and misspellings. Another example is when you see a commercial, and each time its tweaked just slightly different so it sticks out like a sore thumb. ok done bs'ing...
Display more comments