Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Intel DZ68DB

From $100 To $160: Five Z68-Based Boards, Compared
By

Value-oriented system builders celebrate new-found performance and features as Intel continues pushing its mainstream platform towards the high-end. Today, we draw a line in the sand and consider five motherboards priced between $100 and $160.

Intel’s full-sized ATX motherboards often prove our assertions that microATX boards can also have full feature sets, since those ATX-based designs often include little more than a couple of slots to the bottom of a microATX design. Readers who expect sacrifices in features, performance, and stability from the compact upper-section will be surprised to find that this board is designed for stability first, and has enough other functionality to overcome those perceptions.

The DZ68DB adds DisplayPort to the selection of video outputs and demands that anyone who needs VGA use a DVI to VGA adapter. The adapters are cheap, and the old interface is so rarely used that we’re glad to see it go.

A very small voltage regulator sits topside on the DZ68DB, its lower capacity a limitation of cost rather than layout. At $130, the DZ68DB is the second least-expensive product in today’s lineup.

The DZ68DB competes directly with the Biostar TZ68B+ in price, but while the competing board is designed specifically as a low-cost overclocking platform, the DZ68DB is designed for flexibility. The undersized voltage regulator gets added current protection, and Intel addresses all fourteen of the chipset’s USB 2.0 ports. Eight of those ports are found on four internal headers for front-panel devices.

Two of the chipset’s four SATA 3Gb/s ports are designated as eSATA, though one of these has an internal port. That port is intended to connect to front-panel eSATA jacks, though the extended heat sinks of some oversized graphics cards could block it.

Though the DZ68DB layout appears to be based on a smaller microATX design, it departs from that design by placing the front-panel audio connector in its bottom-rear corner. We didn’t find any alternative solder points for microATX versions.

The DZ68DB includes only two SATA cables in its installation kit, but Intel still adds an old-fashioned connector layout sticker for the inside of the case’s side panel. While commercial builders will appreciate the convenience of that sticker, we’re sure that most home builders would have preferred a third SATA cable.

Display all 52 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 14 Hide
    The Greater Good , July 11, 2011 7:01 AM
    vilenjanWhat about looks? The gigabyte board looks so meh, while the MSI board is sexy!


    Do you stare into your case whilst computing, or do you look at the monitor?
  • 10 Hide
    hatethisbull , July 11, 2011 6:59 AM
    90% of this article could've been compressed into the summary page. I would've preferred to see comparisons between, say, a $70 h67 and a high-end z68. Instead of four pages of unsatisfying gaming benchmarks, how about focusing on board usability? Which of the boards have cheap PCI-E retention clips that are going to pop off on first use? Which ones will have blocked ports, etc.
Other Comments
  • 0 Hide
    compton , July 11, 2011 5:54 AM
    I temporarily used a Biostar TH67+ 1155 mobo until I picked up my new board. After seeing the description of the Z chipset's Graphical UEFI I checked Biostar's website. It looks as though they're released the graphical UEFI for all biostar 1155 mobos.

    Now I just wish Intel would do the same -- can't they just rip off Asus's UEFI implementation?
  • 0 Hide
    johnnyb_27 , July 11, 2011 6:01 AM
    Why not use the MSI's Z68A-G65 instead of the MSI's Z68A-G55? They were the same price but now the drop MSI's Z68A-GD55 to 154 before rebate.
  • 3 Hide
    dirtmountain , July 11, 2011 6:09 AM
    Sorry, but rebates don't count. A nice test of the other 4 motherboards though.
  • 10 Hide
    hatethisbull , July 11, 2011 6:59 AM
    90% of this article could've been compressed into the summary page. I would've preferred to see comparisons between, say, a $70 h67 and a high-end z68. Instead of four pages of unsatisfying gaming benchmarks, how about focusing on board usability? Which of the boards have cheap PCI-E retention clips that are going to pop off on first use? Which ones will have blocked ports, etc.
  • 14 Hide
    The Greater Good , July 11, 2011 7:01 AM
    vilenjanWhat about looks? The gigabyte board looks so meh, while the MSI board is sexy!


    Do you stare into your case whilst computing, or do you look at the monitor?
  • 5 Hide
    aznguy0028 , July 11, 2011 7:57 AM
    The Greater GoodDo you stare into your case whilst computing, or do you look at the monitor?

    I look into my case daily when I use the computer. There's a reason why there is a window, and hours of hard work for your perfect wiring job deserves much credit and to be stared at. Not to mention coloring schemes that matches your case/mobo pcb color/fan led colors/etc.
  • 2 Hide
    jerreddredd , July 11, 2011 9:31 AM
    isn't it time we lost the PS2 port? and maybe even the DB15 VGA port also?
  • 3 Hide
    Crashman , July 11, 2011 9:52 AM
    johnnyb_27Why not use the MSI's Z68A-G65 instead of the MSI's Z68A-G55? They were the same price but now the drop MSI's Z68A-GD55 to 154 before rebate.
    MSI picked the GD55 because it's SUPPOSED to cost $160. MSI did NOT pick the GD65 because it's SUPPOSED to cost $180. MSI's predictions from a few weeks back simply didn't pan out.
  • 7 Hide
    Crashman , July 11, 2011 9:55 AM
    jerreddreddisn't it time we lost the PS2 port? and maybe even the DB15 VGA port also?
    Not PS/2, just VGA. They leave the Multi-I/O controller on the board for compatibility in other areas, so PS/2 is "free" and some people still use it at the high end.

    Some cheap monitors still use VGA, but these boards are not for the budget market! For VGA compatibility (for external capture devices and such) they could just use DVI-I and let the oddball user who needs VGA for that oddball purpose supply his own adapter.
  • 2 Hide
    joshyboy82 , July 11, 2011 9:57 AM
    I have been recommending this board based on other reviews and specs in the forum to people and I always get undermined by some guy who tells me he doesn't really like Gigabyte and z68 is just a fad. I am going to repost the shit out of this conclusion on my build recommendations.
  • 2 Hide
    cobra5000 , July 11, 2011 10:09 AM
    The Biostar is available for $99 @ the egg. Man, that is tempting..
  • 4 Hide
    Why_Me , July 11, 2011 10:36 AM
    Yay for the little Asrock that could. Simple, cheap and yet effective. ;) 
  • 0 Hide
    spookyman , July 11, 2011 1:08 PM
    jerreddreddisn't it time we lost the PS2 port? and maybe even the DB15 VGA port also?


    Actually I like the PS/2 port for my keyboard. I have an old 1983 PS/2 IBM 101 keyboard that I still use. Still the most rock solid keyboard that is comfortable to use and its built like a tank. Best part of the keyboard, no "Windows" keys.
  • 1 Hide
    jerreddredd , July 11, 2011 1:50 PM
    Quote:
    Actually I like the PS/2 port for my keyboard. I have an old 1983 PS/2 IBM 101 keyboard that I still use. Still the most rock solid keyboard that is comfortable to use and its built like a tank. Best part of the keyboard, no "Windows" keys.



    Ok, I guess leaving the Keyboard PS2 port might be ok. I figured everyone moved to USB by now. I think I still have an old PS2 KB laying around. I do remember the feel of the full stroke keys and mechanical contacts. mmmm maybe I should dig it out on day.
  • -1 Hide
    torque79 , July 11, 2011 1:50 PM
    I read through the specs twice, and I still can't find Bluetooth mentioned. The ASRock board is listed as a "pro" version, does that have bluetooth? You know lots of people have cell phones that synch contacts and calendar using bluetooth right? I have a hard time beleiving none of the TH reviewers don't, so why is it never listed in your motherboard shootouts? In another recent (higher-end) motherboard shootout it was also missing.
  • 2 Hide
    davewolfgang , July 11, 2011 2:34 PM
    Quote:
    I read through the specs twice, and I still can't find Bluetooth mentioned. The ASRock board is listed as a "pro" version, does that have bluetooth? You know lots of people have cell phones that synch contacts and calendar using bluetooth right? I have a hard time beleiving none of the TH reviewers don't, so why is it never listed in your motherboard shootouts? In another recent (higher-end) motherboard shootout it was also missing.


    Actually "most" people (as you put it) sync using a USB cable, because then they can CHARGE the phone at the same time. You can't charge your phone using BlueT. So why charge using a USB cable plugged into a wall outlet converter plug (I haven't seen a phone that doesn't come with this in the past 2+ years), and then have to go the BlueT thing, when you can just plug that USB cable right INTO your computer and Charge and Sync at the same time.
  • -2 Hide
    torque79 , July 11, 2011 2:53 PM
    Because then you have to have your cell phone charging at your pc, and your pc must be turned on. Surely I'm not the only person in the world that finds both of these restrictions inconvenient.
  • 3 Hide
    davewolfgang , July 11, 2011 3:08 PM
    Quote:
    Because then you have to have your cell phone charging at your pc, and your pc must be turned on. Surely I'm not the only person in the world that finds both of these restrictions inconvenient.


    Since you actually need to power your computer ON for it to Sync in the first place.....................................
  • 9 Hide
    1foxracing , July 11, 2011 3:28 PM
    Gigabyte boards don't require the PC to be turned on for the charging function to work through USB.
Display more comments