USB 3.1 Spec Approved, Brings 10Gbps Speeds

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • smeezekitty
    Since for the most part we are yet to saturate USB 3.0, this isn't a problem.
    Reply
  • vern72
    Agreed. I'm not going to swap out my 3.0 ports for 3.1.... for now.
    Reply
  • skit75
    It seems, at least according to Tom's USB 3.0 jump drive comparison a couple weeks ago, that manufactures have also failed to deliver on the lower end peripherals. This hasn't stopped many of them from plastering USB 3.0 on the product though.
    Reply
  • kajunchicken
    Please can we start having external gpu's for laptops...?
    Reply
  • nevilence
    damn technology you fast >< i only just got usb 3.0 on a new rig, now there is 3.1 lol
    Reply
  • JPNpower
    Wow wow. hold up man...

    "Backwards compatible with USB 3.0 and 2.0"

    In other words, no compatibility with USB 1.X?
    Reply
  • ipwn3r456
    11270962 said:
    Wow wow. hold up man...

    "Backwards compatible with USB 3.0 and 2.0"

    In other words, no compatibility with USB 1.X?

    Yeah it didn't say it on the article. It doesn't really make sense to be not compatible with USB 1.x. But really, I don't think anyone, if not, rarely uses USB 1.x these days.
    Reply
  • JPNpower
    Anybody with a usb 1.x as standard for their PC is crazy. But I can think of many cases where I'd like to quickly edit a word doc or something on an old computer I can borrow.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    11270689 said:
    Since for the most part we are yet to saturate USB 3.0, this isn't a problem.

    Yes we are actually with eHDDs that is. USB is great for mice, keyboards and such but for data transfers it sucks like no other. With USB its one hub that controls all the ports. If you connect 1 flash drive, you get the maximum speed. But add more and each one slows down.

    Sata on the other hand is a per channel setup which means each sata channel gets the full 3Gbps/6Gbps. My eSATA dock gives my WD Black transfer rates of 150-200MB/s while the best my USB 3.0 eHDD gets is 100MB/s. Thunderbolt as well is the same way. Each TB port is its own channel allowing each one to give 10Gbps bidirectional or 20Gbps on the newest one.

    I want it to drop in price of course but USB sucks for data transfers compared to eSATA/TB. Its just not efficient.
    Reply
  • nevilence
    11271075 said:
    11270689 said:
    Since for the most part we are yet to saturate USB 3.0, this isn't a problem.

    Yes we are actually with eHDDs that is. USB is great for mice, keyboards and such but for data transfers it sucks like no other. With USB its one hub that controls all the ports. If you connect 1 flash drive, you get the maximum speed. But add more and each one slows down.

    Sata on the other hand is a per channel setup which means each sata channel gets the full 3Gbps/6Gbps. My eSATA dock gives my WD Black transfer rates of 150-200MB/s while the best my USB 3.0 eHDD gets is 100MB/s. Thunderbolt as well is the same way. Each TB port is its own channel allowing each one to give 10Gbps bidirectional or 20Gbps on the newest one.

    I want it to drop in price of course but USB sucks for data transfers compared to eSATA/TB. Its just not efficient.

    You are right, it does suck compared to the other two, but usb hdds arent about to disappear, so a speed increase is good no matter how you look at it
    Reply