AMD B550 Motherboards Announced: PCIe 4.0 Support for as Little as $100

(Image credit: AMD)
Matt Safford
Managing Editor

After a rough start with the Mattel Aquarius as a child, Matt built his first PC in the late 1990s and ventured into mild PC modding in the early 2000s. He’s spent the last 15 years covering emerging technology for Smithsonian, Popular Science, and Consumer Reports, while testing components and PCs for Computer Shopper, PCMag and Digital Trends.

  • NightHawkRMX
    This is $25 or more over a cheap B450. I think for systems with a CPU like a 3100 or 3300x, PCIe 4.0 is not needed and the buyers would prefer to have a cheaper motherboard. I think MSI -max motherboards (mostly the cheap ones) will still fit the bill for these systems.

    Also, the lack of support for 3000 series APUs on this is plain confusing, though I understand why the choice was made. If the box says "Ryzen 3000 Compatible" I could see how someone with a 3200g will be very unhappy when it doesn't work since the 3200g is a "Ryzen 3000" processor by name.

    Honestly, AMD's motherboard situation is very confusing and will continue to get more and more confusing in many years on the used markets when you have no clue what generation bios is flashed onto a board.
    Reply
  • HideOut
    So a $250 board is a bargain board? WTG Asus.
    Reply
  • HideOut
    NightHawkRMX said:
    This is $25 or more over a cheap B450. I think for systems with a CPU like a 3100 or 3300x, PCIe 4.0 is not needed and the buyers would prefer to have a cheaper motherboard. I think MSI -max motherboards (mostly the cheap ones) will still fit the bill for these systems.

    Also, the lack of support for 3000 series APUs on this is plain confusing, though I understand why the choice was made. If the box says "Ryzen 3000 Compatible" I could see how someone with a 3200g will be very unhappy when it doesn't work since the 3200g is a "Ryzen 3000" processor by name.

    Honestly, AMD's motherboard situation is very confusing and will continue to get more and more confusing in many years on the used markets when you have no clue what generation bios is flashed onto a board.

    well the 3000 APUs (and same for the laptop chips) is a joke. Their naming schemes are just schemes...
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    NightHawkRMX said:
    This is $25 or more over a cheap B450. I think for systems with a CPU like a 3100 or 3300x, PCIe 4.0 is not needed and the buyers would prefer to have a cheaper motherboard.
    The lion's share of that extra $25 is most likely the chipset itself due to upgrading downstream lanes from PCIe 2.0 to 3.0 and probably beefed-up VRMs. Some of the added cost may also be inflation to offset losses from the last couple of months. You'd still be paying most of that $25 extra without PCIe4.
    Reply
  • NightHawkRMX
    HideOut said:
    well the 3000 APUs (and same for the laptop chips) is a joke. Their naming schemes are just schemes...
    Exactly, however it leaves tons of confusion now, and it was confusing back in 2018 when the 2000 series APUs came out. Its a mess.

    Intel is not immune to this:
    Intel Core i7 10750h - 14nm, 6c/12t, Comet lake
    Intel Core i7 1065g7 - 10nm, 4c/8t, Ice lake.
    They both are 10th generation core i7 CPUs, but they are based on different architectures and even different nodes. Granted, you don't have any compatable mobo confusion since these are laptops.
    Reply
  • maikalwolf
    What the heck, Asus? Those prices are all over $100! You know you can find a X570 for under $150 on facebook!
    Reply
  • logainofhades
    Asus is out of their mind. $279 for a B550 board? You can get a Gigabyte x570 Aorus Pro Wifi, for $269. They think just because they throw that strix label on it, it is worth way more, than it really is. My X570 Gigabyte ITX sells for less than what they want to charge for their B550 itx.
    Reply
  • InvalidError
    NightHawkRMX said:
    Intel is not immune to this:
    Intel Core i7 10750h - 14nm, 6c/12t, Comet lake
    Intel Core i7 1065g7 - 10nm, 4c/8t, Ice lake.
    They both are 10th generation core i7 CPUs, but they are based on different architectures and even different nodes.
    Ice Lake and Comet Lake actually have two distinct numbering schemes: five digits model number + TDP class letter for Comet Lake vs four digits CPU model + 'g' + one number for the IGP class for Ice Lake. Fairly straightforward IMO.

    I wish AMD simply appended 'G' to model numbers to distinguish CPUs from APUs instead of doing its entirely messed up and unnecessary numbering of APUs 1000 model numbers above the CPU they are actually based on and appending the 'G' to that... but it cannot do that without causing even more confusion right now because previous-gen APUs already occupy that naming space, it'd need a secondary differentiator like Inte'ls gX postfix.
    Reply
  • agello24
    At those prices in a world recession? no thanks. no way am i going to let any of those companies price gouge me. they can do better with the b550 pricing and drop the prices of the x470's. ill sit back and let the stupid ones buy them at those prices.
    Reply
  • daworstplaya
    NightHawkRMX said:
    Also, the lack of support for 3000 series APUs on this is plain confusing, though I understand why the choice was made. If the box says "Ryzen 3000 Compatible" I could see how someone with a 3200g will be very unhappy when it doesn't work since the 3200g is a "Ryzen 3000" processor by name.

    Honestly, AMD's motherboard situation is very confusing and will continue to get more and more confusing in many years on the used markets when you have no clue what generation bios is flashed onto a board.

    HideOut said:
    well the 3000 APUs (and same for the laptop chips) is a joke. Their naming schemes are just schemes...

    The problem is AMD used previous gen CPU designs in their APUs (Zen+ and Zen2) and named them 1 gen above to match their desktop CPUs (non APU). This wouldn't be problem if AMD just called their current 3000G APUs the 2000G series. And the 4000G series should be called 3000G series.

    We all know their 4000 series APUs are actually 3000 series CPU + Vega GPU and probably share the same BIOS design. But AMD shot themselves in the foot.

    I also wish AMD would call the Ryzen 7 3800x the Ryzen 7 3750x. Then they could've called the Ryzen 9 3900x the Ryzen 9 3800x and the Ryzen 9 3950x could be called the Ryzen 9 3900x. Then they would have 39xx numbers free for their Threadripper parts. But noooooooooo, that is too logical.
    Reply