AMD's Liquid-Cooled Radeon RX 6900 XT Arrives Flexing High Clocks

Sapphire Radeon RX 6900 XT LC
Sapphire Radeon RX 6900 XT LC (Image credit: Kabum)

AMD's liquid-cooled Radeon RX 6900 XT appears to be making its way to the retail market. VideoCardz has spotted a Sapphire listing over at a Kabum, a Brazilian retailer.

Speculation around the graphics card world is that the Radeon RX 6900 XT LC could very well be the incarnation of the rumored Radeon RX 6900 XTX. The latter was expected utilize the Navi 21 XTXH silicon, which allegedly brings the highest clock rates out of AMD's RDNA 2 army. Although we've already seen the graphics card in the wild, AMD hasn't formally confirmed the existence of the Radeon RX 6900 XT LC.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor, RAM Reviewer & SSD Technician

Zhiye Liu is a news editor, memory reviewer, and SSD tester at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • Phaaze88
    Oh, a continuation of the other thread.

    A fan on the actual card would've been nice...
    Reply
  • VTXcnME
    And none the new card abilities actually matters, as none of these cards (as is the pattern of the last year or so) will get into the hands of actual gamers/users

    But boy... I bet it'll mine crypto nicely. :rolleyes:

    Going forward, all the articles about new cards ought just be directed at how well they crypto mine... those are the only users getting their hands on any cards.
    Reply
  • usiname
    I don't know what is more annoying, the prices of the GPUs, or this spam in every article in every second post complaining for everything. I think the second, but they still think they are funny and wont stop complaining.
    Reply
  • Sleepy_Hollowed
    Hopefully it’s quieter than a triple fan design. I have a triple fan card that has no fan spin unless you’re playing games (it lowers clocks to achieve this), and going full blast the fans never go above 1200 rpm so I’m super spoiled in that front.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    What the hell? A single 120mm rad design for 300W? I thought this was going to be a hybrid card, but that design does not give me any confidence it'll be sufficiently cooled... Unless it has a hidden fan somewhere for the HSF or some other dark arts are at play here.

    So weird... And potentially a bad idea!

    I hope someone reviews this, because it's interesting, to say the least.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • usiname
    Yuka said:
    What the hell? A single 120mm rad design for 300W? I thought this was going to be a hybrid card, but that design does not give me any confidence it'll be sufficiently cooled... Unless it has a hidden fan somewhere for the HSF or some other dark arts are at play here.

    So weird... And potentially a bad idea!

    I hope someone reviews this, because it's interesting, to say the least.

    Regards.
    Fury X is 275W with 120mm rad and is very well cooled
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    usiname said:
    Fury X is 275W with 120mm rad and is very well cooled
    That was the high limit, yes. These cards hit 300W normally, so it's 25W extra power which is not trivial and this is a smaller area with a lot more heat on surfice (denser than Fury).

    As I said, this is interesting and I'd like to see it tested. I'm curious if this actually can handle 300W without a hybrid design.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • Phaaze88
    I was expecting a fan on it too...


    Fury X appears to be 300w.
    6900XT also appears to be 300w. Heck, the Strix LC and Sapphire Toxic are both 289w?
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Phaaze88 said:
    I was expecting a fan on it too...


    Fury X appears to be 300w.
    6900XT also appears to be 300w. Heck, the Strix LC and Sapphire Toxic are both 289w?
    It has a board power limit of 300W and a temp cap of 75°C due to HBM. But fair; let's say both cap at 300W.

    And the aftermarket models of the 6900XT are hybrids with a fan, so not quite the same as this one.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • usiname
    Yuka said:
    That was the high limit, yes. These cards hit 300W normally, so it's 25W extra power which is not trivial and this is a smaller area with a lot more heat on surfice (denser than Fury).

    As I said, this is interesting and I'd like to see it tested. I'm curious if this actually can handle 300W without a hybrid design.

    Regards.
    Fury X is 596 mm²
    6900 xt is 520 mm²
    Maybe little hotter, but Fury X is 60C and even if they didn't improve the cooler it won't pass 68-70
    Reply