Intel Announces 48-Core Cascade Lake-AP, Xeon E-2100 Processors (Update)

Intel made a few announcements ahead of the pending Supercomputer 2018 trade show, including its new family of Xeon Cascade Lake-AP (Advanced Performance) processors that come with up to 48 cores and support for 12 channels of DDR4 memory.

Intel designed this new lineup of data center chips with a Multi-Chip Package (MCP) architecture, meaning each processor is composed of several dies, much like AMD's EPYC and Threadripper processors. That finally gives Intel an answer to AMD's core count advantage that it holds with its 32-core EPYC data center processors. Intel also announced a new lineup of Xeon E-2100 processors for entry-level servers.

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • rantoc
    AP = Additional Profit edition?
    Reply
  • Blas
    I wonder why this announcement was made today, Nov the 5th. It probably has nothing to do with the fact that tomorrow, on Nov the 6th, AMD is holding its "Next Horizon" event to introduce the new 7 nm Zen 2 architecture. Probably. Although i'm guessing someone at Intel's marketing department has had to spend the weekend preparing these few slides :)
    Reply
  • bit_user
    21458221 said:
    Intel also claims the processors offer up to 17X more AI/Deep Learning inference performance than its Xeon Scalable 8180 did at launch.
    And yet still probably less than Nvidia's Tesla T40, which likely costs only 10% or 20% as much and burn far less power (50 - 75 W each).

    21458221 said:
    It would make sense to use the third existing UPI port for communication between dies within the same processor package, while leaving the other two UPI connections free for the connection to the other processor in a two-socket server.
    Perhaps two of each die's UPI links are to each other, with one link each going to the outside. But I guess you could have a total of 4 links going to the outside for a fully-connected topology between all 4 dies in a 2-socket config. I just think it would scale better to have more connectivity between dies in-package, given that a single UPI link would probably still be a choke point for apps requiring substantial die-to-die communication.

    21458221 said:
    Intel did reveal that it isn't using an EMIB connection between the dies
    Wow, that's a surprising indictment against EMIB. Quite a reversal, given how hard they were pushing it even within the past year.

    21458221 said:
    whether these processors will require a new socket (they are rumored to drop into an LGA5903 socket)
    For 12 memory channels, I imagine they must.

    I wonder how many PCIe lanes they'll support. Dare we hope to see all 96 lanes per socket?

    21458221 said:
    Intel also announced Xeon E-2100 series of processors.
    These look to be nothing more than the Xeon flavor of the Coffee Lake desktop CPUs introduced about a year ago. This uncharacteristically long lag - normally it's >= 6 months, IIRC. I might be interested in a Xeon version of the i9 9900K, but I guess that might take another year...
    Reply
  • redgarl
    Thunder stealing is now Intel best talent.
    Reply
  • redgarl
    21459565 said:
    I wonder why this announcement was made today, Nov the 5th. It probably has nothing to do with the fact that tomorrow, on Nov the 6th, AMD is holding its "Next Horizon" event to introduce the new 7 nm Zen 2 architecture. Probably. Although i'm guessing someone at Intel's marketing department has had to spend the weekend preparing these few slides :)

    In catastrophe... and with unverifiable number.

    Reply
  • JamesSneed
    Im guessing this 48 core cpu will cost 15-20K if we extrapolate out per core pricing from the 28 core pricing.
    Reply
  • Olle P
    ... Intel hasn't confirmed the chip only comes with two dies, ... That means the company may have designed an entirely new die or disabled four cores per 28-core XCC die
    Why not 3x18 or 4x12 cores?
    No matter which it will either suck a lot of power or run at a really low speed.

    21459524 said:
    AP = Additional Profit edition?
    Absolutely Preposterous!

    Reply
  • jgs5093
    Yeah but do you think you guys could ship my 9900k?
    Reply
  • Grzegorz Wereszko
    Fine print. 48 core vs 32 core Epyc (with SMT disabled)... so good work Intel.. . Guessing that they didn't learn from their recent i9 9900k review?
    Reply
  • omniphonix
    I wonder if Intel's interposer design solves the problem AMD has with low-latency applications on multi-die packages.

    http://www.scanproaudio.info/2018/08/24/threadrippers-2990wx-2950x-on-the-bench-just-a-little-bit-of-history-repeating/
    Reply