Opera On Edge About Microsoft's Recent Power Consumption Browser Tests

Recently, Microsoft did a few power consumption browser tests, whose results unsurprisingly gave the Edge browser, er, the edge against the competition. Opera has now challenged those tests, arguing that Microsoft didn’t open up its methodology, which may be flawed and may favor Edge. Opera performed its own tests, which are more transparent, and now it looks like Opera’s browser is beating Edge on power consumption.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Lucian Armasu is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers software news and the issues surrounding privacy and security.

  • Virtual_Singularity
    Good article. And good for Opera, promptly speaking up about the issue. I don't wish to be biased but frankly when it comes to MS I have difficulty trusting them or taking them at their word these days. And I know I'm not the only one.
    Reply
  • ohim
    Opera uses a dev browser in the test and has add block on, while the Edge browser doesn`t , also the two tests are done completely different, one by watching a video the other by browsing certain websites that have adds in them (Opera not showing the adds has less things to do).
    I use both Opera and Edge and both have their strong points and weaknesses.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    I can run faster than Usain Bolt!**

    Check these numbers:
    Me - 15s - 100mts.
    Bolt: DNF - 100mts.

    Cheers!

    ** Test conducted with both his feet tied to a post.
    Reply
  • VeganGaro
    I dont believe anyone would be that dumb trusting a MS bench...

    #goVEGAN
    Reply
  • therealduckofdeath
    Reducing video bitrate, disabling plugins, dropping frame-rate to 30 fps and almost disabling everything else to the extent you're nearly running in private mode plus ad block enabled isn't really a valid comparison though.
    Though, it is nice to see they're all starting to optimise the browsers.
    Reply
  • RedJaron
    18168867 said:
    Reducing video bitrate, disabling plugins, dropping frame-rate to 30 fps and almost disabling everything else to the extent you're nearly running in private mode plus ad block enabled isn't really a valid comparison though.
    Exactly. I find it funny that so many people by default don't trust MS or their tests. Meanwhile Opera's own admitted testing methodology has problems. If you're gonna bash MS, fine, but at least be consistent and point out the problems of the competitors.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    18168935 said:
    18168867 said:
    Reducing video bitrate, disabling plugins, dropping frame-rate to 30 fps and almost disabling everything else to the extent you're nearly running in private mode plus ad block enabled isn't really a valid comparison though.
    Exactly. I find it funny that so many people by default don't trust MS or their tests. Meanwhile Opera's own admitted testing methodology has problems. If you're gonna bash MS, fine, but at least be consistent and point out the problems of the competitors.

    But Microsoft is evil!!!!!!!!!

    The one thing I am laughing at is "how optimized Edge is for a Surface Book". I mean people really think that short of the unique hinge/dock factor it is that vastly different than any other 2 in 1?
    Reply
  • RedJaron
    18169487 said:
    The one thing I am laughing at is "how optimized Edge is for a Surface Book". I mean people really think that short of the unique hinge/dock factor it is that vastly different than any other 2 in 1?
    Yeah, I'm not exactly sure how that's supposed to work either. Any optimizations for the hardware would apply to all Skylake platforms, wouldn't it?

    But wait, MS is evil, unscrupulous, and underhanded. They for sure put some specially optimized code in Edge that can only be accessed with special white-listed Surface hardware specs and firmware identifiers. Yeah, that's the ticket.

    The only optimization that could possibly be just for the Surface Book would be a calculated processing draw that was designed specifically to the SB's CPU power draw and battery. And if someone thinks they put that much money in R&D for a single device, that risks poorer performance on just about every other x86 mobile device, I've got some great beach-front glacial property available in the Caribbean for sale.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Rule 2, Section 4, my dear mods :)

    Cheers!
    Reply
  • RedJaron
    18169800 said:
    Rule 2, Section 4, my dear mods :)
    Despite what you may think, "trolling" means intentionally inciting an inflammatory or antagonistic response to an attention-seeking device, usually through a post containing controversial or known to be incorrect statements.

    The only post here that I would argue could be seen as seeking an antagonistic response is yours. If you have a complaint about moderator behavior, I suggest you report it to a staff member instead of derailing a thread off topic.
    Reply