AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE review: the lowest binned Navi 31 variant is now globally available, starting at $549

Navi 31 hops on a golden rabbit.

Sapphire RX 7900 GRE Pulse photos and unboxing
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE fills in the gap between the 7800 XT and the 7900 XT. Priced just 10% higher than the former, it's also about 10% faster, providing a good overall value – if not quite exceptional. Sapphire's Pulse gets an extra half-star for being well-designed and exceptionally quiet.

Pros

  • +

    Strong 1440p gaming performance

  • +

    Good overall value at $549

  • +

    Plenty of raw compute

  • +

    Decent efficiency gains

  • +

    RDNA 3 AV1, AI, and FSR features

Cons

  • -

    Still not as efficient as the competition

  • -

    Weaker RT and AI performance (if you care)

  • -

    Delayed worldwide launch and availability

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE isn't a new graphics card — the 7900 GRE officially launched in July 2023... in China. Now it's coming to the U.S. and other regions, as the third variant of AMD's largest Navi 31 GPU using the RDNA 3 architecture, with a starting price of $549. With Nvidia's recently launched RTX 4070 Super and the price cut on the vanilla RTX 4070, it seems AMD felt a need to bump performance in this market segment, and the RX 7900 GRE hopes to claw out some space for itself among the best graphics cards.

We thought AMD was basically done with new RDNA 3 cards when the RX 7600 XT arrived last month, but bringing the 7900 GRE to the U.S. and other areas of the world does make sense. It also makes the RX 7800 XT look just a bit less desirable. The 7900 GRE is similar in some ways to the 7800 XT, as both have four MCDs (memory cache dies) and 16GB of total VRAM, and both are priced in the $500~$600 range. But the 7800 XT only has 60 compute units (CUs) while the 7900 GRE has 80 CUs — a 33% improvement on paper.

Here's the rundown of specifications for the relevant current generation AMD and Nvidia GPUs. You can't just compare raw specs of course, but we'll have plenty of benchmarks to show how AMD's 'new' card stacks up to the competition.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
AMD RX 7900 GRE Specifications vs. Competing GPUs
Graphics CardRX 7900 GRERX 7900 XTRX 7800 XTRX 7900 XTXRX 7700 XTRTX 4070RTX 4070 SuperRTX 4060 Ti 16GBRTX 4070 Ti SuperRTX 4080 Super
ArchitectureNavi 31Navi 31Navi 32Navi 31Navi 32AD104AD104AD106AD103AD103
Process TechnologyTSMC N5 + N6TSMC N5 + N6TSMC N5 + N6TSMC N5 + N6TSMC N5 + N6TSMC 4NTSMC 4NTSMC 4NTSMC 4NTSMC 4N
Transistors (Billion)45.6 + 4x 2.0545.6 + 5x 2.0528.1 + 4x 2.0545.6 + 6x 2.0528.1 + 3x 2.05323222.945.945.9
Die size (mm^2)300 + 225300 + 225200 + 150300 + 225200 + 113294.5294.5187.8378.6378.6
SMs / CUs / Xe-Cores80846096544656346680
GPU Cores (Shaders)51205376384061443456588871684352844810240
Tensor / AI Cores160168120192108184224136264320
Ray Tracing Cores80846096544656346680
Boost Clock (MHz)2245240024302500254424752475253526102550
VRAM Speed (Gbps)182019.520182121182123
VRAM (GB)16201624121212161616
VRAM Bus Width256320256384192192192128256256
L2 / Infinity Cache64806496483648326464
Render Output Units192192961929664804896112
Texture Mapping Units320336240384216184224136264320
TFLOPS FP32 (Boost)46.051.637.361.435.229.135.522.144.152.2
TFLOPS FP16 (FP8)92103.274.6122.870.4233 (466)284 (568)177 (353)353 (706)418 (836)
Bandwidth (GBps)576800624960432504504288672736
TDP (watts)260315263355245200220160285320
Launch DateJul 2023Dec 2022Sep 2023Dec 2022Sep 2023Apr 2023Jan 2024Jul 2023Jan 2024Jan 2024
Launch Price$549$899$499$999$449$599$599$499$799$999
Online Price$550$700$490$920$422$530$600$430$800$1,000

The RX 7900 GRE started trickling out to other markets around the world over the past month, after initially becoming available in China with a converted price of around $650. Today (February 26, 2024) however marks the official unveiling of the worldwide availability and pricing, with a $549 MSRP for the U.S. market. Performance hasn't changed, but we haven't had a card for review until now, so that's certainly something we want to investigate.

One of the interesting questions is why AMD decided not to launch the 7900 GRE outside of China initially. AMD told us: "Originally, the Radeon RX 7900 GRE graphics card was specifically designed to meet the unique market and customer requirements in that particular region (Mainland China). With the changing competitive landscape of the GPU market, it was the right time to bring the Radeon RX 7900 GRE to global markets."

Which just reads a bit weird. If the 7900 GRE is now worth selling around the world, without any changes from the initial specs, what's really going on? The most likely cause is that there was still a glut of previous generation high-end RX 6000-series GPUs available, including cards like the RX 6950 XT, 6900 XT, and 6800 XT. Now that inventories of those have mostly cleared out, there's more room for a new card between the 7800 XT and 7900 XT. Regardless, the 7900 GRE is now launched everywhere — or at least, it will be officially available in the U.S. starting tomorrow, February 27, 2024.

The 7900 GRE uses AMD's largest Navi 31 GCD (graphics compute die), which gives it access to far more compute resources than the step down Navi 32 GCD. The 7900 XTX has the full chip with 96 CUs, while the 7900 XT has 84 CUs and only five of the six potential MCDs enabled. The 7900 GRE only drops the CU count to 80, so perhaps it's a case of AMD having enough Navi 31 GCDs with two defective MCD links.

AMD also reduced the boost and game clocks quite a bit, with a 2245 MHz boost clock (versus 2400 MHz on the 7900 XT and 2430 MHz on the 7800 XT). That in turn makes for a more efficient chip, and the 7900 GRE on paper comes in just 3W below the 7800 XT's 263W TBP (Total Board Power) rating. That's still 60W than Nvidia's similarly priced RTX 4070, and Nvidia's Ada GPUs will continue to reign as the most efficient GPUs right now.

Memory clocks are also slightly lower than on the other high-end AMD chips, which run at 20 or 19.5 Gbps. The 7900 GRE runs its GDDR6 at 18 Gbps. The 64MB L3 Infinity Cache means effective bandwidth should still be very good, but the reduced bandwidth likely creates a slightly wider gap between the 7900 GRE and the next step up 7900 XT.

Theoretical compute ends up at 46.0 teraflops FP32, 23% higher than the 7800 XT and 11% lower than the 7900 XT. Raw memory bandwidth meanwhile is 8% lower than the 7800 XT and 28% lower than the 7900 XT. Like I said, it seems AMD was aiming to create a GPU that would land midway between the other two cards, which is why memory speeds are reduced compared to the other two options.

Jarred Walton

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Notton
    So it falls directly between a 7800XT and 7900XT, and should have been called the 7900.

    It looks really good as a 1440p card.
    It's not that interesting, considering it's price tag.
    I'll wait to see what the RTX 5000 and RX 8000 series brings to the table, unless my 1070Ti croaks first.
    Reply
  • Giroro
    I'm surprised they didn't completely rebrand the card for the west. More generally, I'm surprised they're releasing it in the west at all.
    10% more performance for 10% more money isn't exciting, it's pointless. If they feel the need to release a minor stop-gap card, then I think they won't be ready to release anything truly exciting anytime soon. Maybe the AI surge has made them go back to the drawing board with RDNA 4.

    It's hard to explain, but In my mind, something about calling it "Golden Rabbit" severely devalues it. So I imagine they at least will never spell out that acronym. Gold isn't valuable or aspirational; it's always cheap, fake, and tacky.
    Also, I don't associate rabbits with being fast - I associate them with the weak fluffy bunnies that keep tearing up my yard.

    Calling it golden means its a knockoff. It makes me think the GPU is actually some ancient Radeon HD 7970 chip that somebody is fraudulently trying to pass off as a counterfeit RX 7900 on Temu for $80 - or that it might have a virus or set my computer on fire.
    Maybe I just buy too much counterfeit garbage from overseas.
    Reply
  • UnforcedERROR
    The conversation at $550 right now is almost specifically 1440p raster, which the 7900 GRE performs handily in. At these prices, 16 GB vs 12 GB for the 4070 is the biggest argument in its favor. Neither card is competent in Ray Tracing at 1440p, and the price-to-performance difference isn't enough to argue much otherwise, so it's mostly about longevity.

    As others said, it's not terribly interesting, and it feels like a notably late arrival, but it's something I suppose. I still feel like the $500 - $700 segment of cards is wholly disappointing from both NVidia and AMD.
    Reply
  • ohio_buckeye
    So it’s basically similar performance to a 6900xt or a 6950xt it sounds like? I’m happy with my 6800xt for now that I got under $450 new. I’ll hold onto that a while.
    Reply
  • AgentBirdnest
    Hmm... I don't find it particularly exciting, but I don't have anything to complain about either. AMD had to do something to counter Nvidia's 4070 Super (and non-Super price drop), and this does it.

    What I'm really excited about, is where the 7800XT goes from here. I don't imagine it's going to stay at $500. If it drops to $450, that would be an extremely compelling option, and probably the best value of this generation.

    As always, props to Jarred for the fabulous review! : )
    Reply
  • thestryker
    Seems like decent enough perf/$, but doesn't really bring anything new to the table as expected. Not needing a video card has been a great place to be this generation as we're just now seeing some decent values though still limited to >$400.

    Per TPU the VRAM is limited to 2316mhz which caps the potential memory bandwidth at ~593 GB/s. The power limits on the card are at least standard so if anyone wants to try their hand at getting higher boost clock it is possible.
    Reply
  • ingtar33
    this is basically just going to fill in the hole the 6900xt left in the market when it's stock ran out, they are both priced about the same, both perform about the same.

    It's not bad. the performance difference from the 7800xt to the 7900xt was pretty big (as was the $$ difference), this will slide right in between them at the old 6900xt price. It's a solid buy i think. I mean as solid as today's prices get.

    everything is still overpriced.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    ingtar33 said:
    this is basically just going to fill in the hole the 6900xt left in the market when it's stock ran out, they are both priced about the same, both perform about the same.

    It's not bad. the performance difference from the 7800xt to the 7900xt was pretty big (as was the $$ difference), this will slide right in between them at the old 6900xt price. It's a solid buy i think. I mean as solid as today's prices get.

    everything is still overpriced.
    I do wish AMD hadn't lowered the VRAM speed from 20 Gbps. That probably would have given it another ~5% in performance, which would have been good. Right now, it's between the 7800 XT and 7900 XT, but slightly closer to the former. It makes sense from a pricing perspective, but even a few percent more overall performance would have been nice.
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Like all AMD cards for the last couple of generations, it's good, but it's just priced way too close to nVidia to be a true competitor, and this is no exception. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 the 4070 Super was effectively equal in terms of rasterization and superior with ray tracing, and it's only as little as $50 more expensive. How is AMD going to persuade all of the lifelong nVidia users and people like me who have had multiple negative experiences with Radeon cards to jump from Team Green over $50?

    And once third party custom models are included that price will exceed the 4070 Super, making the 7900 GRE a non starter.
    Reply
  • ohio_buckeye
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Like all AMD cards for the last couple of generations, it's good, but it's just priced way too close to nVidia to be a true competitor, and this is no exception. At 2560x1440 and 3840x2160 the 4070 Super was effectively equal in terms of rasterization and superior with ray tracing, and it's only as little as $50 more expensive. How is AMD going to persuade all of the lifelong nVidia users and people like me who have had multiple negative experiences with Radeon cards to jump from Team Green over $50?

    And once third party custom models are included that price will exceed the 4070 Super, making the 7900 GRE a non starter.
    The good time to buy will be sales maybe around Black Friday imo. Now granted my 6800xt was last generation when I bought it this past December. On the other hand, $439 was a deal for a card that is essentially equivalent to a 7800xt.

    As someone above said if they’d put the 7800xt at $450, or even $475 then it goes on sale, that would be a decent price to performance imo.
    Reply