Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Sparkle GeForce 9600 GT Calibre (Calibre P960 GBOX)

The P960 from Sparkle is the fastest 9600 GT in our benchmark suite and the one with the quietest active cooling solution. The cooler, with its double fan, only reaches a noise volume of 36.3 dB(A), which is about the level of ambient noise (including the PC’s power supply and hard drive) under idle conditions. Even with 3D applications, the noise level does not go up, staying at a soft 36.3 dB(A).

Reference clocks for a 9600 GT are: GPU at 650 MHz, memory at 900 MHz, and shader 1,625 MHz. Sparkle overclocks the Calibre to a 700 MHz GPU speed, 1,000 MHz memory, and no less than 1,850 MHz on the shaders. In the tests, this results in about 8% to 9% increase in overall performance compared to a 9600 GT with standard settings.

The GeForce 9600 GT (G94) graphics chip supports Shader Model 4.0 and DirectX 10. Sparkle equips the test card with 512 MB of DDR3 graphics memory, which is sufficient for resolutions of up to 1920x1200 pixels. The overclocked settings are anchored in the BIOS of the card, and don’t change with different driver versions. One nice feature is that the card comes with a little control unit that lets you recall the Nvidia standard settings, or an energy-saving Green setting by simply pressing a button.

  • JAYDEEJOHN
    So it beats the GTX eh? And you can find brand new nVidia drivers, but no ATI ones? And wheres the 4670? Got halfway thru, decided to skip the rest
    Reply
  • jaragon13
    What about the HD 4850? It costs less than the "last 8800 GTS 512's"
    Asus sells them for what? 170 dollars,free shipping on Newegg?
    Maybe I even saw one @ 160...
    Reply
  • Sus-penders
    Why would anyone get an 8800GTS for $179 when you can buy a better performing HD 4850, for LESS money??? ATI still exists, you know...
    Reply
  • Ryun
    No offense, as the article and tests run were good (I especially like the overall FPS charts), but this information would have been more pertinent, like, 6 months ago.
    Reply
  • Niva
    Uh, I don't get what the people about are upset for. It's a good article, I enjoyed reading and seeing where these cards fit into the scheme of things. I know ATI has made a comeback with their recent cards but until their drivers are completely open and stable I'll stick with nVidia myself so I especially enjoyed this article. Thanks Toms!
    Reply
  • L1qu1d
    Waste of 3 mins, it makes very little sense, the 9600 GTs in sli are around the 280 GTX in performance, yet it manages to get destroyed by the 4870.

    This article would've meant something around the time the cards came out...now I'd much rather like to see the 4850 cards compared or 260s or w.e else that is this gen.
    Reply
  • MooseMuffin
    NivaUh, I don't get what the people about are upset for. It's a good article, I enjoyed reading and seeing where these cards fit into the scheme of things. I know ATI has made a comeback with their recent cards but until their drivers are completely open and stable I'll stick with nVidia myself so I especially enjoyed this article. Thanks Toms!
    Exactly what is open about nvidia's drivers?
    Reply
  • wh3resmycar
    nobody reads the introduction anymore?
    Reply
  • warezme
    warms my heart to see the old 8800GTX included in this test list.

    It's amazing this ancient cards at default speed still sit in the middle of the pack and quickly rise to the top when you turn up AA and texture quality up, beating most every other card cept for 260GTX and SLI and CF rigs.

    It also explains why a pair of old 8800GTX's in SLI OC'ed to at least Ultra speeds on a fast rig are still very hard to out perform by any single card (period)
    Reply
  • There is a reason to get the 9600GT over the 8800GT, power consumption. Look at the numbers, the 9600GT has 1/2 the number of shaders (hence a smaller die). I know the shader clock runs a little faster but a good quality stock PSU with 300W (real, like antec, corsair, etc) should be fine for running it.
    Reply