Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.
Civilization VI (DX12)
Civilization VI’s built-in graphics benchmark runs as quickly as possible, so comparing graphics engines with very different performance is difficult using a timed run. Instead, we utilized the AI-based test. The Radeons all handle it similarly, while Intel’s HD Graphics 530 is quite a bit slower.
As a result of this benchmark’s emphasis, we don’t learn much about the relationship between various AMD GPUs. We do, however, establish that they’re all ~140% faster than Intel integrated graphics. Throwing a discrete GPU into your entry-level gaming system is a good way to improve the experience of mainstream titles like Civilization.
MORE: Best Graphics Cards
MORE: All Graphics Content
Current page: Civilization VI (DX12)Prev Page Battlefield 1 (DX12) Next Page Doom (Vulkan)
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Core i5-14600 is only 5% slower than the Core i5-14600K in leaked benchmark — cheaper chip is only slightly slower but a lot more power-efficient
Nvidia reportedly eyeing Vietnam for future chip production as chipmakers look for China alternatives
Product manager stole $250,000 worth of PC hardware, jailed for three years — perps sold pilfered gear on eBay
Wow, can't even hit 60fps in Doom. Talk about a sheep in wolf's clothing. This is barely a step above those $30 GPUs that you buy strictly because you don't have onboard graphics.Reply
19617624 said:Wow, can't even hit 60fps in Doom. Talk about a sheep in wolf's clothing. This is barely a step above those $30 GPUs that you buy strictly because you don't have onboard graphics.
This is an 85$ GPU, competing with more the likes of a GT 740. So don't expect good details at such a low price point. $30 GPUs are worse than IGPUs BTW.
However, you can still find GTX 750s and 750 tis used for the price of a 550 and it performs much better.
I think if it comes down $10-$20 it will be a contender, it does solidly outperform AMD APUs and hopefully will help to keep our more budget orientated gamers away from the A8s and A10s...Reply
How is this even "Gaming"?Reply
I don't understand why these are all full height double width cards. Wouldn't the only purpose be to install in a small form factor case?Reply
They should be selling the old 460 as the 550, for $80, and then sold this gpu as the 540 for $50-$60.Reply
Its hard to buy a card that you know can't keep up with the consoles. What happens when a big game comes out and you don't have the horse power to actually play it? The 460 and 560 can keep up, but the 550 might he left behind.
Save your pennies for another couple weeks and buy something better, its worth the wait
Very dissapointing for the price. At $50 might make more sense. Then again, I would only use this for a system without IGP for video acceleration.Reply
On a side note, images finally load correctly using Firefox on Android.
Face it... Its a 720p card. Just like something like the a10-7890K using integrated graphics is good for 720p gaming too.Reply
That's the value proposition that should be explored. the A10 w. integrated, or the 550 discreet.
There is a very simple reason nobody makes new GPUs for under $80: there is next to no profit to be made from them.19617777 said:They should be selling the old 460 as the 550, for $80, and then sold this gpu as the 540 for $50-$60.
Keep in mind that out of that $80 MSRP, there is a ~60% distributor and retailer markup on the manufacturer's own price, so the manufacturer itself only sees ~$50 of it to cover DRAM, GPU chip, PCB, support components, HSF, assembly, testing, packaging, R&D, marketing, gross profit margin, etc. In other words, manufacturers barely break even on those and don't want you to buy them unless your choice boils down to either that or nothing. They'd much prefer that you buy the RX560 for $20-30 more which translates to $10-20 more gross profit for the manufacturer.
Who are you going to get an alternative sub-$100 GPU from? Nvidia has bailed out of that market altogether to focus on $150+ (launch-time MSRP) GPUs.
The card is for E-Sports gaming and instead of starting with CS/DOTA etc you start with Doom and BF1.. games for which the card is not intended :)Reply